The Poison Of Fashion: Big Clothing Also Has A Headache.

Nowadays, the necessities and necessities of life closely related to our lives have huge security risks. People are very worried, but at the same time, they are miserable.

When those are proud to wear,

When he was hoping to earn a return to the clothing, when it was detected that there was toxic substances, consumers seemed to be no longer calm. Instead of using hold sister's words, "big brand is not fashion!"

The "poison" of fashion is also hidden in clothing and clothing.

Dyestuffs do not go through, all kinds of quality problems are highlighted. Big suit has encountered a crisis of confidence, making consumers worried.

At the end of 8 2011, Greenpeace announced the world.

Investigation results of toxic and hazardous substances residues.

The report refers directly to Nike, Adidas, Puma, CONVERSE, KAPPA, H&M and other world-renowned clothing brands, and claims that its products contain nonylphenol polyoxyethylene ether (NPE) residues.

NPE in

In production, they are often used as surfactants and decompose into toxic nonylphenol (NP) in water.

NP is a persistent substance that interferes with the endocrine system. It accumulates through the food chain. Therefore, even if the concentration of the substance is low, it is also harmful.

Recently, there were media reports that a result of the comparison of sports clothes released by the Consumer Council of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Chongqing, Hongkong, Macao and other 21 cities, although the results showed that the overall quality of the sportswear in the domestic market was better, but surprisingly, the top four brands were CONVERSE, Columbia, Lotto and the famous outdoor sports brand from Macao.

The problem is mainly concentrated on pH and color fastness. Among them, two brands of sports clothing of Austria brand, Northland and CONVERSE, are not qualified.

Prudent quality supervision for garment OEM must be cautious.

According to the comparative test of sportswear released jointly by the 21 Municipal Council and the consumer protection committee, the products of the Nanjing's Border City Sporting Goods Co., Ltd. are produced by the products of the substandard products of the company. The CONVERSE substandard products are known as the hooded zipper sweaters produced by Shanghai doer Knitting Co., Ltd.; Columbia's unqualified sports pants show that the manufacturers are Jian Bang garments (Huizhou) Co., Ltd., and the unqualified shirts are displayed as Foshan Qinshun knitting enterprise Co., Ltd.

Product subcontracting has become a common phenomenon in brand clothing. While enjoying the mode of OEM to reduce production costs, brand clothing now has to face the risk of OEM mode.

In order to expand the scale rapidly, the outsourcing of production lines has become the only way for brand development.

The foundry mode has a headache problem, which is to increase product quality supervision and control risks.

Viewpoint:

Brand clothing enterprises have always been benchmarks in the industry, but they still need to shoulder responsibilities for employees, consumers, communities and environment while creating profits.

This is not only a clothing enterprise is also the social responsibility of every enterprise nowadays.

The event of toxic dyes is undoubtedly a wake-up call for brand clothing enterprises.

But at the same time, it also poses new problems for the relevant regulatory bodies in the textile and garment industry.

Whether we can prepare for the rainy day and make relevant laws and regulations before the problems happen.

How to protect the interests and safety of consumers is the primary issue we should consider.