"Slipper Door", Who Is The Cell Phone Of The Factory Regulations?

Weekday production

It's cool, but it has to wear plastic slippers to work.

The workers in front of the shoe factory of Chen Yu village, Houjie village, Houjie Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong, have been embarrassed recently. The factory has ordered employees to wear plastic slippers to work. However, the temperature has dropped sharply recently, and many employees have changed their shoes to go to work and have been fined by the factory.

The shoe factory official told reporters that "family rules and factory regulations" are aimed at preventing employees from stealing shoes and employees should obey them.

We are not breaking the law. It is useless for you to complain to the labor bureau. "

(Modern Express November 15th)

Look at what they call "family rules and factory rules". In order to prevent employees from stealing the valuable leather shoes at work, they must wear them in the factory area.

When you get off work, you must open your clothes for inspection; when you are caught, you will immediately change your slippers, and you will only pay 5 yuan or 20 yuan.

In such a cold season, we can see such news, "our hearts are cool and cool."

The cold red is not only the staff's toes, but also their warm hearts. We say that we should let the people live happily and live with dignity.

"We should compromise on the" factory law "or" factory law "to compromise on the" state law ".

In safeguarding rights and interests, this is no longer a contest between ordinary employees and overbearing factories. This is actually a contest between "national law" and "factory law".

The most exasperating thing is that the formulation of such a high handed rule is only for the sake of prevention. In the face of a journalist's question of "stealing shoes," the person in charge said, "for the time being, I haven't found it yet". In order to safeguard his legitimate rights and interests, he used illegal means, and this "precaution measure" was really advanced and creative.

If we are fair with this theory, our employees can also come up with a "precautionary measure". We should work out a "family law" to prevent enterprises from withholding wages, so that the boss can take out a sum of money to set up a "rights protection fund for workers".

Of course, this is just a ridiculous night talk. Our workers certainly do not have this power, but we do not know whether the authority has such power.

In recent years, in order to support the development of enterprises, we have created a relaxed environment for enterprises, and cancelled many "mother-in-law". But we can not let these "little daughter-in-law" who have no "mother-in-law" break their teeth and show off their coquettish behavior.

You see, the person in charge of this enterprise is so justifiably saying: "there is a family rule at home, there are factory rules in the factory. You can't find complaints from the labor bureau."

How can your "long law" still outweigh the dignity of our "national law" and let the "national law" compromise you?

The tube has been managed, the relevant departments have said: "before this has not received similar complaints, they will arrange personnel on-site investigation, the situation is true, will be ordered to immediately rectification."

Without supervision, we will not talk about it. As soon as we get out of the way, let's draw a line.