Guangzhou'S "GUCCI" And "D&G" Luxury Brand Clothing Are Originally Infringing Products.

< p > yesterday, it was reported that there were "luxury brands", "a target=" _blank "href=" http://www.91se91.com/ "clothing" /a "in the condolences received by the difficult masses.

< /p >

< p > the provincial Red Cross responded yesterday that these "a href=" http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_c.asp "luxury brands" /a "are all products that are infringed by trademark by the customs.

According to the memorandum of cooperation between the General Administration of customs and the Red Cross Society of China on the confiscation of infringing goods for public welfare undertakings, the products are distributed to the hands of some needy people as required.

< /p >

< p > < strong > provincial Red conference: < /strong > < /p >

< p > < strong > infringing goods can be used to help the poor, /strong > /p >

< p > yesterday, the reporter called the office of the Red Cross Society of the province, a staff member said that the products were the products confiscated by the customs, which had not been destroyed after the confiscation, but pferred to the Red Cross Society to help the poor.

< /p >

< p >, however, the staff said he did not verify which customs products were donated.

"Customs has official documents. We use them as" Red Cross fraternity for warmth ", and relevant documents can also be consulted by journalists.

The staff also revealed that similar products had been handed over to the two or three batch of customs this year.

< /p >

< p > then, the staff member sent a memorandum of understanding on the confiscation of infringing goods to the public welfare undertakings signed by the General Administration of customs and the Red Cross Society of China in May 2004. The memorandum provides 11 points for the pfer of the infringing goods after the confiscation of the customs to the Red Cross society.

< /p >

< p > < strong > netizens question: < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > counterfeit goods are difficult for the masses. < /strong > < /p >

< p > a netizen said on micro-blog: "is it suspected of infringing the intellectual property rights of business?"

In this regard, the provincial Red Council staff said: "this is fake things, but fake goods also have a certain value.

These things were handed over to the Red Cross after being collected, and we did not generate any additional value, so they were pferred to public welfare undertakings.

< /p >

< p > to solve these problems, the reporters call the General Administration of customs and the Red Cross Society of China to understand the situation.

The General Administration of customs is responsible for coordinating this matter with the Department of policies and regulations, but its telephone has been unable to get through.

The staff who answered the phone at the office of the Red Cross Society of China claimed that they did not know the situation and asked reporters to fax the question to a designated number.

< /p >

< p > < strong > lawyer: < /strong > < /p >.

< p > < strong > should first pick up the infringement mark and then give it to < /strong > < /p >.

< p > < strong > knowing that it is infringing product, but it is donated for public use. Is that feasible? < /strong > < /p >

Lawyer Huang Zhiyong, director of the Intellectual Property Department of Guangdong, < < p > > a href= > http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_p.asp > < /a > > Chinese business law firm, said that the infringing products can be roughly divided into three categories: rectification products, non rectification products and fake and shoddy products.

Huang Zhiyong explained that the rectification product itself is a violation of intellectual property rights and can not flow into the society, but these products themselves have certain use value. After a certain process of rectification, such as removing tags, labels and so on, they can be reused. The pants in the incident belong to "rectification".

< /p >

< p > for the confiscation of infringing products by the customs, he thought "reasonable and feasible". After all, these products still have the use value.

As for these products, there are still visible counterfeit trademarks and tag tags when they are given to the masses.

Huang Zhiyong believed that the customs and Honghui would not be careful enough to deal with the goods. We should first remove these obvious signs of infringement and eliminate the infringement.

< /p >

"P" for the question raised by the lawyer, the staff of the provincial Red Cross office sent a message to the newspaper yesterday. "Thank you for your attention to the matter. We will also send a letter to the General Council and suggest further improvement of the memo."

< /p >