London Children's Wear Week Is Bound To Make Many People Feel Bad.

< p style= "text-align: center" > img border= "0" alt= "align=" center "src=" /uploadimages/201304/03/2013040314405260423.jpg "/" < < > >

"P", every year around the world, fashion shows come into fashion every week, sometimes even more than once a week.

For example, when Istanbul fashion week ended last Saturday, India will hold the Lakm fashion week on March 22nd - 26, and the Moscow fashion week will be unveiled in March 29th. Istanbul

As a matter of fact, I have always felt that John Cheever's short story "The Swimmer" is a metaphor for Fashion Week: it's just not a relay from a pool in the suburbs to another pool, but from a fashion week in to another fashion week.

< /p >

< p > but I am obviously running away from this topic. The problem is that if there is a gap, a fashion week will be added to fill the gap.

Not long ago, London hosted the first Kids Fashion Week between Istanbul and India fashion week.

Yes, London has held women's wear week. Last year, men's wear week was held again.

But unlike men's week (praise), this is bound to make many people feel uncomfortable.

< /p >

"P" fashion show has also been spotting the holy and flawless children! Can't we leave a piece of pure land that has not been attacked by the brand to protect the world from the poison of consumerism?

Besides, it is very easy to spread the claws to children. Although I am a parent or a fashion person (not necessarily in accordance with the above order), I have great opinions about this, but it is not for the above reasons, for these reasons are essentially nonsense.

< /p >

From P to Disney (McDonald) s, children have been deeply influenced by the brand, and this situation has been for a long time.

Like adults, they also know what brand enthusiasts mean, and my seven year old child can put the reason why Apple is cooler than NOKIA.

< /p >

< p > the only thing in the dark is the brand itself. When you were young, the familiar brands were Danskin and Ace Laura instead of dujibana (Dolce & Gabbana) and Rachel Riley (Laura).

Besides, there are many advantages in organizing children's fashion week (any fashion week).

< /p >

< p > no matter from the perspective of the London municipal government or its pulling effect on all related industries, such as hotels, restaurants and taxi industry, the fashion week is better than the disadvantages.

There is no doubt that the London municipal government is pleased to see its success.

This is the reason why it is hard to change the fashion week, even though the whole industry is in a bad prospect. Big cities do not want to cancel or even shorten the time of fashion week. They want visitors to spend as much time as possible and spend too much time in their own cities.

< /p >

< p > from the perspective of brand itself, holding fashion week is also of great benefit: the establishment of children's fashion week can achieve fashion brand's self positioning "lifestyle" desire, life, of course, including family members of all ages.

By peddling children's "a" target= "_blank" href= "http://www.91se91.com/" > clothing less than /a and spending less gimmicks to flicker the branded adults, they also "seduce" children from childhood, and become loyal fans of brands when they grow up.

After all, the recent courtesy of children also includes famous brands such as Gucci (Gucci), Burberry (Burberry), Dior (Dior) and Stella Mccartney (Stella McCartney), though they failed to appear in London Fashion week.

< /p >

< p > the entire children's fashion show will last two days (Wednesday and Thursday, Wednesday to the public). At that time, the T stage show will show children's clothing series such as Paul Smith Junior, Chloe (Chlo), Little Marc Jacobs, Diesel (Diesel) and so on.

Announcing the news of London children's wear week, Alex Alexa Alex Theophanous, founder of Alex and Alexa, said: "children's wear" a target= "_blank" href= "http://www.91se91.com/" > designer "/a" believes that there should be a special exhibition platform.

By organizing such activities, we hope to expand children's fashion to the whole world.

{page_break} < /p >

Because of rapid physical development, every few months, a target= "_blank" href= "http://www.91se91.com/" > clothes < /a > does not fit well, and likes to run outside the floor, so is it worth buying more than 25 dollars for them? (I personally think that the gain is not worth the loss, but it is only my opinion); it is also irrelevant to whether or not to let the children wear the mini version of adult clothes. The parents hope that the eternal heart will show the children the most fashionable clothes in the shrinking adult clothing, or even do not allow children to act as models. What is the real problem? < p >, which has nothing to do with how much parents are willing to spend to buy children's fashion. I will let each parent decide for themselves: children.

< /p >

< p > the real problem is that the way to pmit information is wrong.

I think Marshall McLuhan, a media theorist, can understand this point. (Marshall McLuhan)

Fashion shows can never be too popular, and children's fashion shows should be calm.

In other words, the T platform gives the audience the overall impression; as with the film, the audience accepts things that are completely shaped.

On the other hand, children's fashion show should be (or even more than the adult fashion show) a free world, so that they can learn to play and play with their children's identity and sense of ability. It should let the children go wild.

< /p >

< p > childhood is the stage of gradually realizing the function of clothes (except for warmth and protection); clothing is an effective means of revealing one's identity: the fake kid wearing jeans and T-shirts, the princess wearing a gauze skirt, and the weird guy wearing punctate stripes, these children are actually in the wind.

When children are dressed in pink or unmatched styles from head to toe, it is not because they do not know how to dress, but because they choose their own results.

Even so, it is very important to gradually understand that your choices will affect the people around you (especially now), because image is the key to interpersonal communication.

< /p >

< p > adults are more clear about this (and should be); for them, T stations only provide themselves with different choices.

But children need specific places to interpret their identities.

The fashion industry must have a long-term vision, and decide by the children themselves: if necessary, put it in the store, instead of showing it on the T stage.

I think the fashion industry should have this wisdom.

< /p >

< p > of course, fashion also teaches us that "should" is not equivalent to "willing".

Black trousers should be suitable for everyone, but we all know that this is never the case (not everyone is wearing black).

< /p >