Gaultier Advanced Customization Is Criticized For Its Outdated Concept.

P > a fashion critic with a well-trained, professional and professional ethics, the eyes must be bright and sharp, where the designer does not do it, and the commentator dares to suggest that it is the right thing to do.

< /p >

< p > the Paris advanced custom fashion week is coming to an end. The brand name of the same old name Jean-Paul Gaultier is still obsessed with the refurbishment of the 80s century style. Unfortunately, it was criticized by the famous fashion commentator Tim Blanks on Style.com.

< /p >

< p > as a front-line commentator, Tim's judgment will affect the viewing angle of many people. Of course, Jean-Paul Gaultier is deeply disturbed and angry. However, the rage of Gaultier has not played a positive role in solving the dispute. At the very least, it is warning the other side that "I am not a soft persimmon".

< /p >

"P > Maison Martin Margiela continues to carry forward the mask that reminds me of the appearance of a tick infected pet dog. Viktor&Rolf's surrealism experiment is still interesting, and its theatrical tension is still inspiring through the revival of the old Schiaparelli Schiaparelli Christian Lacroix.

But in addition to these, the old name Jean-Paul Gaultier's brand name of the same name is still obsessed with the refurbishment of the 80s style in this season. Unfortunately, it was criticized by Tim fashion Blanks, a famous fashion critic, for its sharp criticism on Style.com.

Tim first pointed out that model Nabilla Benattia appeared to be very low-end in order to criticize the old and inferior concepts of Jean-Paul Gaultier this season, and clearly pointed out the ungraceful accusation of this series from the fashion profile.

Undoubtedly, this comment is unprovoked in the eyes of the parties.

Jean-Paul Gaultier immediately issued a personal letter to < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/pioneer/" > Tim Blanks < /a >, directly responding to the disrespect of the latter in the commentary.

< /p >

< p > things have become very dramatic. People in the commentary are waiting to see how the war will end. Tim's comment on Style.com has not been removed from beginning to end. It seems that the confrontation between the two sides is very clear.

< /p >

< p > I once tried to write short fashion reviews for magazines. After reading my articles, a friend criticized me severely. "Your commentary reads like boiled water. As far as you can say, it's all good. Who else needs you? It's a big contrast to you in life. You're happy and clear in life, and once you get to the article, you become the editor of a public relations press release."

I was a little surprised, but not because I was afraid of offending the specific brand, so as to create difficulties for myself to continue to write the manuscript in the future. The real reason is that if I were not very disgusted with the design, I would try to cut the fashion from the place that I was interested in, and try to analyze fashion with my familiar art history. This is not a deliberate charity. I just filtered out the ugly part as far as possible.

< /p >

< p > to say that, a well-trained, professional and professional a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" fashion /a commentator must be sharp and sharp, and the designer is not doing enough. The commentator is bold enough to suggest that this is the right thing to do.

Yes, the ideal situation is discussed here, but things are always tired by reality.

Today's fashion industry has completed the pition from free competition to monopoly capital like other industries. LVMH and KERING and other giant groups have made the fashion and luxury industry more and more homogenized and homogenized. The KENZO brand has undergone tremendous changes in the visual style of the whole brand since the two directors who hired Opening Ceremony took the responsibility of designing. From the romantic pastoral scenery of the flower to the corner of the modern youth city street skateboarding youth activities, the fashion world called it "the street fashion of advanced garments", trying to cover up the fact that the brand subverted the past design concept with such a noun which highlights the fashion democratic process. "KERING"

< /p >

< p > back to the a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > Jean-Paul Gaultier < /a > brand, this senior custom series knows that the design of this old naughty designer consistently knows that this season's design has never jumped out of his previous standard, just because he has a reluctant mood for the 80s of last century. It is indeed an era worthy of much remembrance.

Tim Blanks obviously doesn't care about this, and sneers at the fashion profile of the Gaultier season, which has a funny cartoon sense and loses its elegant elements. Is he really playing the fool? Tim reads the history of fashion, pointing out that some design inspiration is beneficial to the works of the older generation of Yves Saint Laurent in the comments on Jean-Paul Gaultier, and Gaultier unpolitely pointed to the fashion history flaw in the personal open letter, which also made the latter dodge less.

< /p >

< p > the judgment of beauty and ugliness is not science and engineering after all. There is no single truth proposition. In the so-called one hundred readers' eyes, there are one hundred Hamlett.

However, the stance of Tim Blanks this time has not made people see his clear value orientation of beauty and ugliness. Although he did not have a clear flaw in the praise of Christian Dior's Raf Simons, his words of praise also had to be associated with LVMH's big backing behind the CHRISTIAN DIOR brand.

< /p >

< p > as a front-line commentator, Tim's judgment will affect the viewing angle of many people. Of course, Jean-Paul Gaultier is deeply disturbed and angry. However, just as the implication of "calm and natural cool" implies, the rage of Jean-Paul Gaultier has not played a positive role in solving the dispute. At the very least, it is warning the other side that "I am not a soft persimmon".

To speak thoroughly, both sides are senior representatives of their respective posts, and their minds are broad.

I feel sorry for Jean-Paul Gaultier's unwarranted criticism and his indifferent response.

Master, you can win the respect of the whole world, and do not worry about trifles.

< /p >