Strict Restrictions On The Elimination Of Mink And Fox Skin Processing Trade Are More Advantages Than Disadvantages.

< p > strictly limiting / canceling the processing trade of mink and Fox Skins, and implementing import zero tariff requires policy combination.

If only the former is adopted, on the one hand, because of smuggling, there are still big interests to be drawn, and it is difficult to put an end to it. On the other hand, powerful enterprises will choose to move abroad, such as ASEAN countries (all are raw materials imported from zero tariff).

These two situations will harm the interests of the state and the development of the fur industry.

If only zero tariff is imposed, instead of strictly limiting or canceling < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp > processing trade < /a >, the non ordinary taxpayer enterprises that account for 40% of the industry's output will need to pay 13% of the value-added tax by adopting the normal customs import method, and such enterprises can not deduct the input tax from the value-added tax invoice.

< /p >

< p > it is worth noting that strictly restricting / canceling "a href=" http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp "mink" /a "and" fox fur processing trade ", and implementing zero tariff on such raw skins imports are both advantages and disadvantages for the country and industry.

< p > 1 can provide effective policy support for the prevention of industrial relocation.

At present, some domestic fur enterprises that want to get rid of the haze of smuggling and obtain cost competitiveness through legitimate channels have chosen to move their enterprises to ASEAN countries. This trend has shown an increasing trend.

This situation is not only harmful to the development of China's < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp > fur industry < /a >, but also to the use of the state.

The pfer of business has resulted in the pfer of business tax and income tax to ASEAN countries, and no tariff has been received by the state because of the zero tariff agreement of the free trade area.

At the same time, the experience of Europe and America has told us that the development of our country is inseparable from the support of the manufacturing industry, and that the huge capacity of our fur products to go abroad can have far-reaching adverse effects on the national economy and the people's livelihood.

< /p >

< p > 2, which can increase national tax revenue and safeguard national interests.

Take imported raw marten as an example. According to customs statistics, the import amount was 397 million US dollars in 2012, including 93.5% of processing trade and 6.5% of general trade.

Because processing trade is exempt from tax, the state can receive only 16 million 147 thousand and 100 dollars of the general trade tax.

If the processing trade is abolished and the zero tariff is imposed, it will not be considered that more leather will be declared to import according to the real price. The tax revenue is only 3.97 times 13%=5161 million dollars, which is 3.2 times of the original income. It is not calculated that the tax revenue brought by a large number of non ordinary taxpayers to the general taxpayer will be adjusted by the adjustment of the policy. The adjustment of the policy will push the enterprises to scale and standardize the adjustment. 397 million.

It can be seen that strictly restricting or cancelling processing trade and implementing the import zero tariff policy will not reduce tariff revenue, but will allow most of the leather goods to enter the way of legal declaration. The national tax revenue will increase substantially and safeguard the interests of the state.

< /p >

< p > 3, it will not impact China's fur animal breeding industry, but also promote the development of related aquaculture industry.

China's fur industry is short of raw materials, especially high-grade raw materials.

The imported raw skins are mostly high-grade raw material skins. The quality of raw materials and the price of raw materials differ greatly from that of domestic raw materials. The raw materials of domestic raw materials and imported raw materials meet the needs of different markets, not homogeneous competition.

At the same time, the resources of high-grade raw material skins in the world are limited. Due to the restrictions of various countries, the quantity of aquaculture basically keeps stable. At present, nearly 80% of the high-grade raw material skins in the world have actually entered the Chinese market from different passages, for example, the leather of "processing trade" imported from 93.5% of imports is actually "enjoying" zero tariff.

Therefore, after the implementation of zero tariff, there is little room for increasing import volume in China and will not impact domestic raw material market.

In addition, with the sunshine and openness of high-grade fur raw material trading, domestic fur animal breeding practitioners can gradually narrow the gap with developed countries through learning experience, exchanging technology and introducing varieties, which is conducive to raising the level of fur animal breeding and gradually changing the situation of high-grade leather relying on imports.

< /p >