The Owner Of The Clothing Factory Was Sentenced To Death.

Factory fire hazard is ordered to rectification but not rectification, the final fire caused casualties, recently, a town in Jinjiang, Shenzhen, Shanghai clothing The owner of the factory was sentenced to 1 years' imprisonment by the Jinjiang municipal court of first instance. This is the first case of Jinjiang being convicted of fire duty accident and is rare in Quanzhou.

In 2013, Shimou set up a garment processing factory on the one or two floor of its own residence in shfeng village, Shenzhen town, without setting up the business license, and set the residence in the production workshop and storehouse upstairs, and there were no fire doors and second safety passageways. In May 14th of the same year, the police station of Jinjiang City Public Security Bureau conducted fire safety supervision and inspection of the factory, and found that there was a serious hidden danger of fire safety and ordered it to make corrections within a specified time. In May 29th of the same year, the fire brigade of Jinjiang Public Security Bureau ordered Shimou to stop production and impose a fine of 5000 yuan. Shimou only paid. fine No implementation was carried out in accordance with the rectification opinions.

At 20 o'clock last September 4th, the factory worker Xu, who was sentenced to work overtime in the workshop, fired mosquito repellent incense on the cutting lathe and fired without leaving mosquito repellent incense. On the second day and 3 o'clock, mosquito repellent incense ignited the combustible materials such as rag strips below the cutting lathe and caused a fire. A pair of mother and son were killed by the burning of a pair of mother and son on the upper floor of the processing factory, and another female employee was seriously injured. After the incident, Shimou reached a mediation agreement with the relatives of the dead, and handled the aftermath properly. After the Jinjiang municipal government's "9. 5" fire investigation team found that Shi was responsible for the accident.

After hearing the court, the defendant believed that the defendant was unauthorized to operate at home. Garment processing plant In addition, the production and operation sites and residential places are set up in the same building, refusing to carry out rectification opinions, resulting in a fire, resulting in 2 casualties and 1 serious injuries. In view of the fact that he can faithfully confess the crime in court, he can actively raise funds to compensate his family members, and properly handle the aftermath. He will be given a lighter punishment according to law and will be sentenced to 1 years' imprisonment.