Ali And Tencent Department Blocked The War

In the mobile phone taxi market, after burning money subsidies and flameout,

The fast taxi and Tencent Department drop taxi wrestling has not stopped.

Yesterday, the fast taxi said, "fast red envelope" was blocked by Tencent WeChat, while Tencent WeChat responded that fast red packets could not be shared in the circle of friends because of the induction sharing.

This reflects the upgrading of the two taxi software competition, on the other hand, it also highlights the lack of standards of openness and shielding in the Internet industry.

A quick taxi public statement said: "since November 21st, a large number of user feedback can not share a quick taxi ride in the circle of friends.

It has been proved that the quick taxi sharing function has been blocked by Tencent. "

At the same time, the fast taxi also accuses, "sharing a taxi in WeChat."

Its software can be unimpeded.

The first time the announcement was issued, the Tencent responsible person responded to the Beijing Commercial Daily reporter, "WeChat pays great attention to the user experience, and it will strike a blow against the actions of user induced sharing and malicious marketing. It is a long-term and lasting policy."

In the eyes of the industry, the reason for the two sides' attitude is that the social platform plays a decisive role in maintaining and upgrading the user stickiness of the taxi software.

WeChat, which has nearly 480 million active users, should not be overlooked.

The fast red envelope was blocked by WeChat, which naturally affected the size and activity of its users.

Data show that as of the three quarter of this year, domestic taxi software cumulative account size of 154 million, fast taxi and drop taxi showing a duopoly pattern, fast taxi with 54.4% share of the lead, but driblets are not willing to be the market duer.

Just as Tencent and the fast taxi broke out, there were also some netizens who revealed that Alipay's sharing links in WeChat were blocked. One article from Alipay's wallet service window (similar to WeChat's public account) was shared with WeChat, and the user could not open the link. The official reason for the show was that "the screen blocked the request from the browser." the Tencent public relations official explained that the reason was related to the announcement of the shield a year ago.

However, this statement was denied by the public relations department of the ants, who claimed that Taobao and Alipay were two different things. What the netizens saw was WeChat's shielding of Alipay's sharing links.

The Tencent and the ants in the golden suit have been fighting fiercely in the same WeChat group, and they have never been able to reach agreement on what is right and what is wrong.

It should be noted that the relevant Tencent and

The screen of competition has been swept away.

It is reported that pocket communications and other third party applications based on WeChat's e-commerce are also blocked by Alipay, unable to call Alipay interface.

Together with a quick taxi sharing, WeChat was banned. These are considered to be the appearance of the QQ war.

Hu Gang, Secretary General of the China Internet Association Research Center, pointed out that the trend of the Internet industry is interconnection and sharing and win-win. But to the product operation, the Internet companies can formulate specific operation rules, but how to balance interconnection and scale, how to define the opening and shielding, there is no clear boundary in laws and regulations. Almost all the mainstream Internet companies have been screened wars.

However, the anti unfair competition law, which was introduced in 1993, is being revised. It is expected that the Internet unfair competition will be used as a separate chapter to strengthen the definition and explanation of unfair competition in the Internet industry.