Adhering To The Luxury Tax Operation Standard Is The Key.

"Taxation is one of the important levers for the state to regulate and control the economy. By levying extravagant tax, it can strengthen the regulation function of Taxation, which is of great significance for narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor and promoting the construction of a harmonious society."

Pan Qinglin, a member of the CPPCC National Committee, pointed out that building a harmonious society means building a more equitable society.

By adjusting policies and institutional arrangements, and comprehensively using tax and fiscal means to increase the intensity of income distribution, it is in line with the major policy of the country.

It is undeniable that after the global financial crisis, China's luxury consumption ability has turned the world around.

According to data released by Goldman Sachs, China's luxury consumption in 2010 was as high as 6 billion 500 million US dollars, the first global growth rate in three consecutive years.

According to Goldman Sachs, the number of Chinese consumers willing to spend luxury goods will rise from 40 million to 160 million in the next 5 years.

A report also points out that although the US is still a big consumer of luxury goods, sales tend to tilt toward the lower priced leading luxury sector, while Chinese consumers buy the most expensive luxury goods.

In the face of such wealth outflow, more people in the industry advocate China's policy revision.

In their view, the right way should be to increase the Levy of luxury tax.

"We know that the reasons for objection to the Levy of luxury tax are mainly on restraining consumption and pferring consumption.

But this can not answer the fact that a country whose income is less than that of the US 1/14 consumes the luxury of 1/4 share worldwide.

Why can't we levy luxury tax? "Said Professor of economics at Nanjing University.

"For the problem of" fat water flowing into the outfield ", it is entirely possible to bring luxury goods into the country.

The adjustment will not be the reason for reducing the tax rate. "

Sharon Yeung thinks.

However, she also acknowledges that the introduction of luxury tax can regulate social income distribution to a certain extent, and will reflect social equity in a wider range.

In this regard, China's Taiwan has already been ahead.

Taiwan has passed the "special goods and services Tax Ordinance" (luxury tax), the next 300 million new cars and other special goods will be 10% luxury tax, 1 years to pfer housing or land, then 15% luxury tax.

So, in some experts' view, it is not true to be true.

It is very necessary to impose high taxes. At this stage, it can play an important role in effectively preventing the outflow of wealth and promoting social equity.

In this way, we can follow the principle of "buy or sell, sell or sell casually", and encourage more purchases and more sales, as long as you pay taxes.

Some experts pointed out that in the collection process, when importing goods, they can be withheld, or after customs clearance.

In terms of taxable luxury, large imports should be targeted, such as aircraft, yachts, drill tables and luxury cars.

However, in Hongkong media people

It seems that if we want to levy, there must be a broad consensus in the society that we should accept this tax.

Secondly, there must be a set of strict, more scientific and operable standards, such as what is the standard of luxury goods? What luxury purchases should be paid? How can we collect the tax? How should we spend it in different places?

"In a word, we can regard the luxury tax as a necessary link in tax development. Regardless of the sounding advantages and subsequent effects, we must first solve the standard of operation and talk about how to levy luxury tax."

Sharon Yeung concluded.