Leaders Of The Most Dislike Use Of Several Categories Of People

The first one is talented and capable people.

This kind of person has always been the focus. No matter who should be the leader, this kind of person will have to use it. No need to fail. Someone has to work for him.

Well, this kind of people often feel pressure on their leaders because their ability is too strong.

If a person's knowledge and ability are stronger than that of his leadership, leaders are not as good as him in many respects. He undoubtedly has his own ideas and practices in many aspects. He will not agree with the leaders' practices and opinions, leading to a leader's face and dignity, which makes the leadership very unhappy.

As the lines in the TV play say, "you are too good, and the good ones worry me."

The leader will no longer use him because of his good character, maybe out of jealousy, maybe out of fear, and worry that his name will cover himself in the unit.

The second is a decent and upright person.

This kind of person should have been appreciated by the leader, but why did the leader not reuse him? The reason is very simple. This kind of person only talks about principles and feelings, and it is difficult to integrate with the real society.

For example, a leader can casually go out to dinner and drink with others. This money can not always lead the boss to pay his own money. If so, who should be the leader, or will he die poor? This kind of money will undoubtedly come out of the unit.

The third one is people who see nothing but profit.

The expenditure of a unit has been very tight for the leadership to waste. If a few mercenary subordinates are allowed to fill their pockets, then how can the leaders go through it? Have they not circulated such words? Wages are basically not moving, and wives are basically not used.

That is to say, leaders, if leaders are allowed to start moving their wages, what kind of world have they become? Can leaders still use you? Obviously not, so this kind of leader is the most disliked.

The fourth is not too.

Those who like to decentralization from the leadership.

A leader is a man who does nothing but a man.

If someone else does not do anything but a human being, then where does the leader put himself?

No matter how talented or capable you are, if you don't listen to your leader, you will break it.

How can a leader be able to tolerate you? The position of leadership on this issue is very firm. He rather uses a man who is incompetent and obedient, nor does he use a person who affects his full exercise of power.

The fifth is like grasping leadership.

And those who are against the leader.

This kind of person most lets the leader have a headache, he does not work properly all day, likes to secretly inquire about the leader some shameful matter, then intentionally or unintentionally lets the leader know, lets the leader be very difficult.

No need for him, there is a handle in the hands of others, use it, really contrary to their conscience! What should we do? We have to give him a less important post, let him go, as long as we do not make trouble for ourselves.