Public Comment On Officials' Dress Is Not Wrong.

A micro-blog entitled "Secretary of the Ji'an Municipal Committee Wang Ping is secretary or rich woman", highlights Wang Ping's dress, watches, rings and necklace accessories on different occasions, causing netizens to question.

The staff of the Jiangxi Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection told reporters that the content reflected in the net post had not yet been noticed.

But at the same time, it said that if we want to reflect the issue of officials, we should have a reasonable basis and we should not just evaluate it from clothing.

I think the provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection is half right. If we reflect the problems of the officials, we should raise the factual basis of their violation of discipline. But I think it is wrong to say that he should not be evaluated solely from his clothes.

We should look at the problem through the dress of the officials. The public is not wrong in evaluating the officials' dressing.

On the one hand, the general public has little contact with officials, especially leading cadres with certain official positions. Most of the public can only see it on television.

The public really knows little about their situation.

It is because of information asymmetry that people can only judge from the superficial phenomena seen in a moment. Therefore, it is the first step for the public to understand and recognize officials.

On the other hand, although the appearance of officials reflects the appearance, there is inherent connection between phenomena and essence in philosophy.

The reason is very simple. The dress of officials may reflect the world outlook of officials to a certain extent.

And when the official property announcement system is not perfect, how do you let the people supervise the officials?

For officials,

It should have been noticed.

First of all, officials should pay attention to dressing.

Too much attention to dressing may affect the work, but excessive attention to dressing will go to the opposite side.

Secondly, officials should be dressed in accordance with the objective situation.

For example, to adapt to their own identity, adapt to the atmosphere of the environment, adapt to the target audience, and adapt to the economic level.

Some officials went out to attract investment.

And to the fields, it should be the release shoes and short sleeves.

Because of this, experts will dress the interviewing civil servants. The government will also specially train officials how to dress up. This is indeed something that officials need to know about.

More importantly, it is not only a mistake but also a lot of successful experience to identify officials from the dress of officials.

Did cousin Yang Dacai develop a watch from a table he wore, and then found out corruption from multiple tables? And as a highly honest Hongkong, their reporters also attached great importance to finding problems from the dress of officials.

For example, in 1998, the mayor of Shenyang, Mu Suixin, invited a group of Hongkong reporters to interview in Shenyang. A reporter in Hongkong paid attention to the mayor's "outfit", from shirt to tie.

Belts and leather shoes are all world-famous brands, and rough estimates are worth tens of thousands of Hong Kong dollars.

After returning to the port, the reporter said in the report that the monthly income of the mainland mayor is only 1000 yuan. How can Mu Suixin afford such a valuable "outfit"? Two years later, Mu Suixin has been investigated and dealt with.

From this perspective, observing officials' dressing is indeed an important way to discover the clues of corruption. We should continue to learn from this experience.

As a discipline inspection committee cadre, we do not think so. We feel that his anti-corruption level needs to be improved.

In the same way, it is meaningful to disclose Wang Ping's necklace, brooch, watch, bracelet and ring.

If it is worth a lot of money, it needs to find out whether its source is right and whether it belongs to its economic capacity.

If this is not the case, it may be the clue to corruption.

Whatever the purpose of the whistleblower, we should all agree and understand the public comment on official dress, and officials should be able to stand up to the guesses and doubts of ordinary people.