LV Prosecute Beijing's Kailaid Market For Trademark Disputes

Because of the Beijing kailid International clothing There are a large number of merchants in the market limited for a long and continuous sale of goods infringing their exclusive right to trademark. Recently, Louis Weedon (LV) company asked Kim Caie De to claim compensation in westbound court.

Beijing kailailid international garment wholesale market is located at the four tower of Beijing zoo bus hub. It occupies the most advantageous core position of Beijing zoo business circle, with an area of more than 40 thousand square meters. It has more than 2500 shops, and a large number of well-known clothing brands both at home and abroad. It is a modern clothing wholesale market with functions of leisure, entertainment, catering, shopping and tourism.

　　 LV In the indictment, the company said: Louis Weedon Marley Siti (LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER) is a world-famous high-end brand. Its trademark is widely used in high-end fashion goods such as luggage, leather goods, clothing, etc. it is internationally recognized as the top grade brand and enjoys the popularity of the world's top brands. To provide consumers with quality assurance products, LV sells products only through its direct sales network, which includes the website and the LOUIS VUITTON store on the website.

LV believes Kim kailid. market There is a large number of merchants' long-term and continuous sales of goods infringing on the exclusive rights of registered trademarks of LV companies, failing to fulfill the prerequisite management obligation to guide and urge the involved businessmen to standardize their operations, nor have they done any late management obligations to educate, warn, suspend business, and rectify the business owners involved. Now LV company appealed to the court to request the court to order the Kim Caie de market to stop infringing the exclusive right of LV company's registered trademark, and disclose the leasing contract and the relevant information of the shop operators involved in the case. At the same time, it requested the court to order its compensation for LV company's economic losses totaling 500 thousand yuan, and the reasonable expenses incurred by LV company for the investigation and collection of the infringement liability and the lawyer's fees and notarization fees totaling 110 thousand yuan, and bear the cost of litigation in this case. At present, the case is under further trial.