TPP Origin: Geopolitical Characteristics Are Obvious. China Is Open Minded.

Some domestic views regard TPP as a flood of water, and think that China will be greatly curbed or even isolated.

In fact, TPP is a high standard FTA, and China should accept the challenges of various high rules and promote its own reform and opening up in the face of challenges.

But similar to cold war thinking, there is not much need, which runs counter to the trend of the world.

This is the demeanor of the great power, and in essence, it is China's fundamental strategy to deal with TPP.

This attitude should also be the correct posture for domestic enterprises to treat TPP: strong itself, looking for opportunities and meeting challenges.

If the US also uses TPP as a weapon for China to "kick ass", we can expect that the future of TPP will not be too good.

China should treat TPP with an open attitude.

Gao Hucheng, Minister of Commerce, said recently that China is open to the World Trade Organization rules and to promote the institutional integration of regional economic integration in the Asia Pacific region.

China hopes that TPP and other free trade arrangements in the region will promote each other and contribute to trade, investment and economic development in the Asia Pacific region.

As we all know, China is not in TPP now.

TPP was originally a multilateral free-trade agreement launched by New Zealand, Singapore, Chile and Brunei. It has no reputation. Until the United States came in, it pushed the market to a level. It also had a special significance for China. The reason has already been said by Obama: the United States does not allow China and other countries to write the rules of the global economy.

This is a bit of a challenge. The men are more naked: TPP is equivalent to "aircraft carrier".

Mccain, chairman of the US Senate Armed Services Committee, said

Equivalent to 10 aircraft carriers. If the US can succeed in establishing TPP, the United States will greatly enhance its ability to cope with China's challenges.

New York Times also published an article after the TPP reached an agreement that TPP is the "economic aircraft carrier" that the United States checks and balances with China.

The article thinks that TPP is regarded as a check and balance for China, because China is trying to expand its influence in trade and other fields, including the South China Sea issue and the establishment of Asian investment bank and other events and actions.

This has also led to a lot of opposition in the US. The presidential candidate Hilary who had always supported the TPP negotiations suddenly changed the direction of the wind and clearly opposed TPP, on the ground that TPP did not meet the expected standards, which could stifle American employment and not protect it.

。

Another presidential candidate, Trump, also called this a bad agreement. The government's incompetence has gone beyond the scope of its understanding, which is consistent with his consistent big mouth style.

These objections reflect that TPP's achievement and final implementation are not smooth sailing.

All kinds of arguments seem to indicate that the United States is trying to dominate global trade rules with TPP, which itself needs to pay some economic cost, which makes the present TPP exhibit a mixed character.

TPP currently includes 12 member states, including the United States, Japan, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Brunei, Mexico, Peru and Chile. The economies of 12 countries account for 40% of the world's GDP. There are big countries, small countries, rich and poor countries, which do not include GDP world second China.

And those countries with different sizes and different rich and poor will pursue common compliance.

The agreement led to internal opposition and resistance.