• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Who Is The Employee Who Advocates "Double Pay"?

    2015/10/17 10:35:00 45

    LabourersDouble WagesEvidence

    If a laborer claims that the employer should terminate the labor contract, it should give evidence to the employer about unilaterally cancelling the labor contract.

    If a worker can make a reasonable statement of the fact that the employer is relieved and provide evidence of the above evidence, it can be concluded that the fact that the employer unilaterally terminates the labor contract is established; if the worker fails to make a reasonable statement of the fact that the employer is relieved, and fails to provide any evidence to prove the fact that the employer unilaterally terminates the labor contract, it should bear the adverse consequences of the burden of proof in accordance with the law.

    "Who advocates and who gives evidence" is the general rule of proof in labor dispute arbitration.

    According to the sixth provision of the labor dispute mediation and arbitration law, labor disputes arise, and the parties have the responsibility to provide evidence for their claims.

    The evidence relating to the dispute is under the control of the employing unit, and the employing unit shall provide it. If the employer fails to provide the evidence, it shall bear adverse consequences.

    The general principle of burden of proof in civil action should be applied to handling labor dispute cases, that is, "who advocates and who gives evidence", but the principle of inversion of evidence should be applied in specific circumstances. The Supreme People's court's "provisions on civil litigation evidence" stipulate that "in labor dispute cases, the employer shall bear the burden of proof when the labor dispute is decided by the employer's decision to expel, remove, dismiss, rescind the labor contract, reduce labor remuneration, and calculate the working life of workers."

    The tenth provision of the labor contract law stipulates: "in establishing labor relations, a written labor contract shall be signed.

    If a labor contract has been established and no written labor contract has been written at the same time, a written labor contract shall be concluded within one month from the date of the employment. "

    The eighty-second rule states: "if the employer fails to conclude a written labor contract with a worker for more than one month after the day of his own employment, he shall pay the laborer two times the monthly salary."

    According to the opinions of the Shanghai Higher People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of the labor contract law (Shanghai Gao law [2009]73), the conclusion and performance of the labor contract should follow the principle of good faith.

    The laborer has actually worked for the employer. If the employer has not signed a written contract with the employee for more than a month, whether he or she needs to pay the wages of the worker twice, we should consider whether the employer has performed the obligation of honest consultation and whether the laborers refuse to sign the contract.

    Of course, such consultations should be consultations aimed at the conclusion of written labor contracts.

    If the employer has already done the duty of honesty, and because of the force majeure, the unexpected situation or the worker's refusal to sign a contract and other reasons, the labor contract has not been signed. It does not belong to the employer's "no written labor contract with the laborer" as mentioned in the relevant laws and regulations. If the employer fails to enter into a written labor contract due to the employer's reasons, the employer should pay the worker twice the wages according to law.

    However, the employer has the right to refuse to sign a labor contract.

    Burden of proof

    If the fact of dissolution is established, the employer shall bear the burden of proof for the type of resignation according to the interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the application of law in labor dispute cases.

    In the judicial practice, the relevant departments will examine who is going to lift the lifting, whether it is a lifting of the consultation between the two parties, or the unilateral rescission of the laborers, or the unilateral lifting of the employing units.

    According to the present law, the employer shall notify the employing unit when he unilaterally terminates the work. If the worker fails to notify the employer to leave on his own, the employer may unilaterally terminate the disposal according to the worker's requirements.

    In addition, the employer shall bear the responsibilities of labor management. Therefore, the burden of proof should be imposed by the employer if he proposes to lift the form and how to rescission it.

    If

    Employing unit

    The fact that the worker resigned or resigned automatically failed to provide corresponding evidence to prove it, and did not testify against the rescission of the labor contract in accordance with the law, which may be considered as an illegal termination of the labor contract by the employer.

    If the employing unit violates the provisions of this law to terminate or terminate the labor contract, if the worker requests to continue to fulfill the labor contract, the employing unit shall continue to perform it. If the worker fails to continue to fulfil the labor contract or the labor contract can not continue to perform, he shall pay the worker compensation in accordance with two times the economic compensation standard stipulated in the forty-seventh article of this law.


    • Related reading

    Labour Law: Employers Can Dismiss Workers With Resume Fraud.

    Law lecture hall
    |
    2015/10/16 14:18:00
    59

    Conversion Contract Signing Unit Length Of Service Is Reduced

    Law lecture hall
    |
    2015/10/15 8:31:00
    35

    Clothing Infringement Case: Is It Difficult To Fight The Tort Lawsuit In Clothing?

    Law lecture hall
    |
    2015/10/14 10:56:00
    65

    Belstaff4200 $10000 Online Fraud Lawsuit Succeeded.

    Law lecture hall
    |
    2015/10/13 13:59:00
    48

    Leshan'S "Law Seven Entry" Work Will Be Held On Site.

    Law lecture hall
    |
    2015/10/12 10:41:00
    72
    Read the next article

    Children'S Clothing Market Is Becoming A Trend. The Threshold And Risk Of Traditional Garment Enterprises Should Be Considered.

    In recent years, during the difficult period of development of the clothing and textile market, many brands have seized the trend of children's wear market. During this period, the entry of traditional clothing enterprises should consider the threshold and risk.

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 99re热这里只有精品| 国产欧美日韩在线观看一区二区| 国产激情一区二区三区在线观看 | 大地资源视频在线观看| 午夜免费不卡毛片完整版| 中文乱码字字幕在线第5页| 老司机成人影院| 欧美亚洲国产精品久久高清| 国产自无码视频在线观看| 免费国产怡红院在线观看| 一区五十路在线中出| 精品久久久中文字幕人妻| 嫩b人妻精品一区二区三区| 免费在线观看毛片| japanmilkhdxxxxxmature| 理论片2023最新在线观看| 国模冰冰双人炮gogo| 亚洲日韩精品无码专区网址| 337p人体欧洲人体亚| 欧洲无码一区二区三区在线观看| 国产日本在线视频| 亚洲国产精品综合久久久| 竹菊影视国产精品| 欧美一区二区三区精华液| 国内精品久久久人妻中文字幕| 亚洲欧美在线观看一区二区| xxxx日本在线播放免费不卡| 美女污污视频网站| 小嫩妇又紧又嫩好紧视频| 国产99久9在线视频| 久久亚洲国产精品五月天婷| 欧美成人性动漫在线观看| 日韩AV无码久久精品免费| 国产3级在线观看| yy4080李崇端60集视频| 欧美精品xxxxbbbb| 国産精品久久久久久久| 亚洲中文字幕av在天堂| 1000部精品久久久久久久久| 日韩精品中文字幕无码一区| 国产一卡2卡3卡四卡高清|