The Government Led Policy Should Give Way To Enterprise Development.

Tax reduction is an important means to enhance the vitality of enterprises, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises.

In addition to lowering taxes, the government still needs to reduce the non tax expenditure of enterprises. Especially for some government priced infrastructure, we must break vested interests in order to really reduce production costs for enterprises.

In order to further promote overseas consumption reflow and stimulate domestic consumption, since January 1st, China has further expanded the scope of tax reduction for imported consumer goods, and implemented tax reduction for 16 imported consumer goods, such as luggage, wool or cotton coats, fur suit suits, scarves and blankets.

After tax reduction, the provisional import tax rate for luggage and wool suit suits is 10%, the provisional import tariff for fur coats, scarves and blankets is 8%, the provisional import tariff of vacuum thermos cups is 12%, and sunglasses are 6%.

According to the introduction, in addition to these daily consumer goods, household water filter bottle core and other household filter products tax reduction is also worth mentioning.

In accordance with the tariff implementation plan of 2016, the provisional tariff rate for domestic water filters including household filter bottles dropped from 12% to 5%.

This is also a good news for the general public who is increasingly concerned about the health of drinking water.

The reason for the high cost of enterprises lies in the high cost of production.

He told reporters, for example, "a big cost faced by enterprises is logistics costs.

The logistics cost of our country is relatively high in the whole world.

The key reason is that some local governments have overcharged the infrastructure such as highways, and some road fees have already recovered their costs, but they continue to charge.

If the vested interest is not broken, the cost of enterprises will be hard to reduce. "

In addition to the tax burden, Wang Yongjun said that enterprises actually need to pay a lot of non tax costs.

Wang Yongjun said, "the original enterprise payment project is complicated, and there are some phenomena of arbitrary charging in some places.

Once an enterprise has dealings with government departments, it will face all kinds of administrative examination and approval and expenses, which in fact will lead to institutional paction costs and increase the burden on enterprises.

Xin Guobin, Vice Minister of the Ministry of industry and commerce, said at the launching ceremony of the fourth national publicity week on lightening corporate burdens in October this year.

The central economic work conference put forward that we should reduce institutional paction costs and further standardize intermediary services.

We should reduce the burden of enterprises' taxes and fees, further tax and fees, clean up all kinds of unreasonable fees, create a fair tax burden environment, and reduce the value-added tax rate of manufacturing industry.

To reduce social insurance premiums, we should study and streamline the "five risks and one gold".

Combing reporters found that the current small and medium-sized enterprises need to pay income tax, value-added tax, business tax, turnover tax, stamp duty, deed tax and so on more than 20 kinds of taxes.

Tengtai, President of the Huambo Economic Research Institute, said that from the micro level, the average tax burden of Chinese enterprises is about 40%, which is 10 percentage points higher than the average level of developing countries.

Based on this, the recent policy proposals on structural tax cuts have increased.

Wang Yongjun, Dean of the Institute of Finance and economics of Central University of Finance and Economics, told reporters: "tax reduction is an important means to enhance the vitality of enterprises, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises.

At present, the government has trillions of financial funds idle in bank accounts, so the government has much more room to cut taxes for businesses.

The meeting proposed that, in order to reduce the financial cost of enterprises, the financial sector should create a policy environment for normalizing interest rates and make profits for the real economy.

We should reduce the price of electricity, promote the marketization of electricity prices, and improve the linkage mechanism of coal and electricity prices.

We should reduce the logistics cost and push forward the reform of the circulation system.

Journalists have learned that the adjustment of tax policies on cross-border electricity supplier import has already been in the process of deliberation. At present, departments have reached agreement. The relevant programmes have been heard: first, increase the support for cross-border electricity providers, push the tax policy of the pilot cities to the whole country, and implement a unified tax policy across the country; two, increase the three to 50% tax on the basis of the current postal tax rate, which is different from the current postal tax, and is different from the general trade tax. The level of tax rate is between two. This can not only reduce the difference, but also encourage the pformation of traditional import enterprises to the electricity supplier, and promote the cross-border electricity providers.

It is understood that at present, China's cross-border electricity retail imports, that is, B2C, is mainly divided into direct purchase, direct mail import and bonded imports, while bonded imports can only be implemented in 8 pilot cities such as Shanghai. At the same time, the import tax of the pilot cities is applicable to the mode of postal tax.

Bonded imports refer to the practice of cross-border electric business importers to build warehouses in the bonded area. First, they import goods into domestic bonded warehouses by means of general trade, and determine buyers through the electronic business platform. After the domestic consumers order, businesses send small package goods directly from bonded warehouses, which greatly saves costs and time, and is also more convenient for consumers.

According to the types of imported goods, customs offices currently collect 10%, 20%, 30% and 50% postal tax respectively.

Zhang Bin, a researcher at the financial and Strategic Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said that the biggest difference between cross border electricity providers and general trade imports is that the general trade import should pay import value-added tax and customs duties, of which the import value-added tax is 17%.

The two tax is packaged together by mail tax. The postal tax of most goods is 10%, the tax burden is much lower than the general trade, and when the tax amount is less than 50 yuan, the customs is exempted from the relevant taxes and fees.