The Business Tells You Seven Big BUG In The New Cross-Border Electricity Supplier Policy.

In April 8th, China will fully implement the new cross-border electricity supplier policy. With the release of this policy, more and more problems will be exposed. Today, businessmen tell you the seven major BUG of the new cross-border electricity supplier policy.

Cross border import

Countdown to the new deal is coming, but cross-border e-commerce platform providers, brands and service providers are still faced with many perplexities and concerns caused by policy uncertainty.

According to the three ministries issued by the Ministry of finance, the General Administration of customs and the State Administration of Taxation, China will implement the tax policy on retail import of cross-border e-commerce since April 8, 2016.

In April 6th, the "4.8 cross border import electricity supplier tax new deal" summit held by Xinjin newspaper, including Tmall international, Jingdong global purchase, suning.com, vip.com and other cross-border e-commerce platform, as well as Ecolite Hongkong small household appliance manufacturers, German Inferno supermarket chains, German health care products merchants Salus, South Korea the Jamy beauty makeup department, the British Sainbury s supermarket and service providers North Alliance, all said "accusing" the uncertainty of the new deal.

Controversy one: there are differences between the new deal and the superordinate law.

The fifty-sixth provision of the Customs Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that goods subject to the prescribed amount can be exempted from customs duties.

The forty-fifth provision of the customs regulations of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the goods of one vote shall be exempt from customs duties if the tariff is less than RMB 50 yuan.

According to the "New Deal", the "50 yuan tax exemption quota is cancelled".

The new regulations promulgated by the three ministries and commissions such as the Ministry of finance, the General Administration of customs and the State Administration of taxation are only departmental rules, which are obviously contrary to the two superior laws of the Customs Law and customs regulations.

According to the eighty-eighth law of the People's Republic of China, the effect of law is higher than administrative regulations, local laws and regulations.

The effectiveness of administrative regulations is higher than that of local laws and regulations.

Dispute two: 20 thousand year consumption limit to restrain consumption demand

Data predict that by 2020, China will have 500 million middle class.

China's overall consumption continues to escalate. In 2015, the number of outbound tourists in China reached 120 million, and the total overseas consumption reached 1 trillion and 500 billion yuan, behind which is a huge demand for consumption upgrading.

For the 2000 yuan single quota and the annual consumption quota of 20000 yuan in the new deal, how did the relevant ministries and commissions actually figure out?

Is it possible to publicized the calculation process?

As China's purchasing power is stronger and stronger, and overseas consumption presents a huge demand for consumption upgrading, will the new deal restrict the consumption demand of twenty thousand yuan per year?

And to a certain extent, encourage the market of private purchasing and parallel imports.

Using blocking method to try to solve the problem of domestic industrial upgrading is "impracticable".

For many cross-border electricity supplier enterprises, before the tax reform is mainly cross border bonded stock mode, after April 8th, it means that more than 2000 yuan of goods can not be sold, the pressure on the existing stock is huge.

For consumers, more than 2000 yuan of goods can only go overseas direct mail, and how the consumers pay taxes is facing technical difficulties.

For example, the German Inferno supermarket implemented the "order not moved, logistics first", and more than 2000 yuan items could not be sold after April 8th, which had a greater impact on inventory.

If the positive list is not matched, it is not clear what goods should be stored.

Controversy three: the "positive list" speed is slower than industry expectations.

In the new deal, apart from tax changes and consumption quotas, the biggest controversy is that the regulatory authorities put forward the commodities applicable within the scope of the list of retail imports of cross-border e-commerce, namely, from the previous negative list to the implementation of the "positive list" regulation.

But up to now, the "positive list" has not been officially announced.

What businesses are most worried about is that once the product is not on the positive list, what will happen?

There is no policy now.

Forced to be shipped overseas or destroyed?

"Negative list" tells businesses which goods can not be sold, while for the "positive list" regulation, many commodities are uncertain.

For example, the best British milk sold in North China is now sold for one hundred thousand barrels, and the "positive list" can be sold. There is no clear information. The real problem is that the North Union's bonded warehouse in China has one hundred thousand barrels of milk stock. If it can not be sold, it can only be returned or destroyed.

Controversy four: supporting implementation details lack of landing execution

There must be a detailed supporting document for the implementation of the policy, and the rules should have room for the actual operation and development of the market, but there is no detailed rules for the new cross-border electricity supplier.

The international deputy general manager, Yue Yue, said the uncertainty of the supporting technologies in the new deal is too strong and the operability is very weak.

Before the introduction of the technical scheme and supporting documents, the question of how to pay taxes is more than two thousand yuan.

Where is the tax payable?

"Vip.com logistics deputy general manager Wu Di also said that according to the new deal, more than two thousand yuan of goods were taxed according to general trade customs, but individual consumers could not be declared as the main body. Local customs were saying" do not know how to levy taxes, there is no system ". Some customs even told businesses that more than two thousand yuan of goods were not reported, but only a refund.

Ecolite, Wang Zhengang, a small household appliance manufacturer in Hongkong, said that if more than two thousand yuan is direct mail, for example, if Hubei consumers get the product, they will pay taxes to the customs of Tianhe Airport in Wuhan, and take two hours' ride. Otherwise, the product will be returned to the market, which is very unreasonable.

Jingdong global purchasing director Qiu Huang is puzzled that the current major policies are focused on the bonded mode, and whether the postal delivery mode will be further raised.

Do you encourage B2C platform to mail?

Qiu Huang said that no official information has yet been obtained.

Controversy five: the new deal has no buffer period policy and lacks stability.

Wang Junxiu, director of the Institute of information society, said that the implementation of the new deal in April 8th was very poor, and that the implementation of technical measures and supporting documents had not been introduced.

Cross platform business experience shows that there may be problems in the execution of a new emergency or new regulation.

Some cross-border electric business enterprises said that in April 8th the implementation of the new rules on the same day, may not be able to "ship".

There may be problems with the new upgrade of the customs system, and the industry and consumers will have to pay for it.

This is not alarmist talk.

Wu Di, deputy general manager of vip.com logistics, has revealed that there has been a problem in a new customs of the new deal, which has accumulated tens of thousands of orders every day.

Zhang Yigong, a service provider's North Alliance, said that the implementation time of the new deal to merchants was too short, and the window period of three months was not given.

German health care products business Salus (Salus) responsible person Pan Xiaowen said, the cross-border electricity supplier new deal is like "just opened a window, and closed", the policy lacks continuity and stability.

Controversy six: cross-border electricity providers without "reputation" industry will be strangled.

Wu Di, deputy general manager of vip.com Logistics Development Co., Ltd. said that the new tax system is equivalent to a "quasi birth certificate" for cross-border electricity providers. After the tax reform and adjustment, the cross-border electricity providers "settled", but whether they can enjoy a series of rights and obligations behind them, it is still doubtful whether they will go deep into development.

Yuen Yue, deputy general manager of Tmall international, also said that after the "tax" tax reform, whether the policy can respect the new thing of personal trade, and give a reasonable "reputation", a complete set of management system will be introduced.

If the cross-border electricity providers are "settled", all laws applicable to 90s will kill the industry.

The domestic cross-border import e-commerce platform hopes that the state can give the qualitative recognition of the legal status of the cross-border import electricity supplier, not just the updated version of the Interim Regulations.

Some cross-border e-commerce importers have even begun to wonder. Where is the purpose of the cross-border electricity policy?

Is it necessary to reduce the tax difference between general trade, or to encourage cross-border electricity providers to promote industrial upgrading in all aspects of the country, and whether cross-border electricity providers are the industries that the country will support for a long time?

Controversy seven: general trade codes may raise regulatory costs.

Tmall international platform has more than 5000 brand businesses, and now they are very confused.

For example, according to the 27 categories of postal mail categories, they are more suitable for mass commodity management, and the cost of supervision is low.

Coding, a platform is hundreds of thousands of categories, there are only more than 8000 coding, each category is inconsistent, whether it is suitable for cross-border electricity supplier is open to question.