Labor Law: There Is No Reason To Accuse Labour Of Touching Porcelain.

To be frank, the accusation of "labor touching porcelain" is unreasonable.

In general cognition of the "touching porcelain" incident, most of the "porcelain touching" people are behaved in accordance with rules and regulations, while those who "touch porcelain" are looking for things to gain benefits; however, the "labor touch porcelain" is obviously not the case. Since you are in violation of the law, why can employees not claim compensation in accordance with the law?

Yes, "professional rights holders" have some discussions in the moral field, but compared with the illegal activities of enterprises, moral defects can be ignored.

Instead of complaining about other people's "touch porcelain", why do not they want to improve?

To put an end to labor risks? On the one hand, we want to reduce the cost of enterprises by illegal acts, but on the other hand, we turn around to accuse others.

In my opinion, the accusation "

"Or" professional rights activists "are essentially the same as Wang Hai and other professional counterfeiting people.

Why do most of the public opinion pay much praise to Wang Hai and other professional anti fake behavior, rather disdain for the "professional rights protection" behavior in the labor contract? The reason is that the society has already formed an atmosphere against counterfeiting and shoddy, but it still has a long way to go to protect workers' rights and interests.

Whether reasonable or unreasonable, enterprises must have the right to blame and complain, but the government needs to balance the interests of workers and employers.

If we admit that "the labor contract law protects the enterprise very much, it will eventually hurt the interests of the workers".

Insufficient protection of interests will ultimately damage the interests of enterprises.

One angle of economic pformation is to come out from the economic mode of "low labor cost".

When the labor contract law came into effect in 2008, China's economic environment is still in a trend of upward trend. The pressure of economic pformation is not so large now. It is generally believed that all problems can be solved in the development.

Now, the new normal economy of L is basically a foregone conclusion. Enterprises are infatuated with the "demographic dividend". It is inevitable that the labor contract law is not enough to protect enterprises.

For enterprises, the burden is not only on manpower cost, but also on production cost, tax cost and so on.

Therefore, both the enterprise and the government should be careful to say "labor touch porcelain", and the labor contract law can not afford all the "evil".

According to different situations, it is necessary to make some amendments to the labor contract law within a scientific and reasonable scope so as to make them more suitable for the needs of the society.

But what we need to be vigilant is to use this as an excuse to open the economic pformation and reintroduce the low cost "demographic dividend" economic model again to the mainstream position.