We Must Focus On How To Play The Four Roles In The Workplace.

Life is a big stage, everyone is an actor, but the role is different.

Whether your role is successful or not is related to your success in your life.

Of course, it is very important to play a role well in addition to ability.

If a supervisor manages more than 10 employees, the supervisor will play 4 roles as manager, leader, manager and leader.

If the supervisor wants to do well, in other words, if he wants to succeed, he must play the 4 roles at the same time.

In fact, any middle management manager plays the 4 roles at the same time.

Even an ordinary employee, if the employee is a clerk in the management department, he also plays the 4 roles.

First of all, play a good role as a manager.

As a supervisor, he manages more than 10 people and manages a job. His first task is to manage his staff well and arrange his work in an orderly and orderly manner so as to maintain the normal operation of his daily work.

Otherwise, a supervisor who can not even maintain his normal work is certainly not a qualified supervisor, that is to say, he has not played the role of a manager.

Any manager is the same, who needs to play the role of a good manager.

A unit has occurred such a thing, when a staff in a more important management position is leaving, the employees who take over the work do not seriously carry out the handover formalities, and think that the partners are colleagues who have worked with them for many years. So they signed the handover procedures hastily, did not do a careful check and check, and allowed him to stay in his job for several days.

A few days later, as the employee of the takeover gradually became familiar with the newly accepted work, he found that his ex predecessor had buried a lot of "* *" in his follow-up work, and also involved serious loss of information.

The man who left the office went to work in another similar company.

As a result, it can be imagined that it not only caused passive confusion to the staff of the takeover, but also caused a great negative effect on the normal operation of the company.

This phenomenon is especially prevalent in today's highly skilled technology companies.

In practical work, people often do not grasp the role of managers. They do not want to control or dare to manage. Especially when it comes to emotional matters, it is even more so.

This is the result of not playing the role of a manager.

Second, play the role of a good leader.

What is "leadership" means "making decisions and finding ways".

This is very easy to understand.

In fact, leadership and management are relative. If management is to organize orderly and orderly, leadership is to activate the organization and pform it from norm to state of motivation and movement.

The combination of management and leadership is to require employees to play every employee's creativity and enthusiasm in a standardized and orderly manner. If management is to organize and maintain normal operation of daily work, leadership is to constantly innovate and surpass the organization.

To sum up, the combination of management and leadership is to ensure the normal operation of the organization. Under the precondition of ensuring the normal operation of the organization, it is necessary to change the unreasonable place in the original work procedure through the leadership of the leader, so that the working procedures, organizational structure and personnel mix will change qualitatively, thus multiplying effect will be generated, and the mental state of each employee can be adjusted through the leadership of the leader, so that he can work in a relaxed and pleasant atmosphere, so as to achieve the goal of enabling employees to actively develop their potentials, actively publicize their individuality and highlight their wisdom, not only improve their daily work efficiency, but also improve their daily work quality, and finish their daily work with high quality and efficiency.

If we simply manage and lead from the perspective of man, it can be said that management is to limit the negative factors in human nature, and leadership is to make the elements of human nature conducive to work through artistic means.

In real work, a head of a department often has such a situation, the character is stable, and the management department is the highest rule without making trouble. The result is that there is nothing wrong with the work, and the management department can stabilize the normal operation.

For a long time, employees are accustomed to it, and they are all satisfied with the status quo.

If an employee makes a few suggestions and suggestions, even if the leader does not say anything, the employees around him will also be kind enough to persuade him: "or do you want to make a mess of it?"

If an organization develops such an atmosphere, it will be phased out sooner or later, because such an organization has suppressed the creativity of human beings, and the organization has no vitality and stagnation.

The society is advancing and the market environment is changing. It is almost impossible for a constant organization to survive and develop in this changing environment.

The speed of change and progress of an organization is only higher than the average speed of social progress, otherwise it will only maintain the status quo, and will be eliminated in general.

Therefore, a leader who lacks the sense of leadership role is incompetent.

As a leader, we must have a sense of leadership role, keep pace with the times and go ahead.

If a leader does not have the sense and ability of leadership role, he or she will quit the leading position early and be a mere victim.

The role.

So even a small group leader, who leads only a few people, should also have a sense of leadership.

Unless I do not hold this position.

Third, play a good role as a manager.

A supervisor or department manager often has such a situation that he does a good job in his department. In other words, such an intermediary manager is not only a successful manager but also an excellent leader. However, he is in a tight relationship with other departments and is not in good relationship with the management department of the flat level. The reason is that he has not played the role of the manager well, or that he himself has never realized that he is a manager, that is, he is not conscious of the role of the manager.

In particular, it is the manager of the big profit making department or the head of the main management department.

The head of the main business department or the main management department thinks that he is the most important and most important person who fails to accept the management and even disagrees with the management of the senior level leaders.

This is very dangerous.

The reason why an organization operates normally is that different departments are maintaining.

Just like a closed bicycle chain, without any link, it is impossible for a bicycle to turn normally.

Different management departments represent a whole organization to perform different duties of the organization. If the head of a department refuses to obey the management, then can the whole organization fail to function properly? If the heads of departments are not satisfied, the whole organization will be paralyzed.

Therefore, as a head of a department, any member of an organization should receive management and play a successful role as a manager.

In practical work, some people may act as managers and leaders when they have a sense of role, but they are often not conscious of managers, even if they accept other people's management.

Because in this part of people's consciousness, it is considered shameful to be managed, especially when they accept the management of others in front of their subordinates.

In fact, this kind of person is lack of role consciousness. He is a manager when facing managers.

Is it not unusual for a manager to not accept management? Is it not a dangerous situation for the individual being managed? Because you are breaking the rules of organization and breaking the rules of the organization, which means it is not dangerous. Such a department is responsible for it. At this time, we should put ourselves in a position to think about it. When you are managing others according to rules and regulations, what kind of mood will you be in? What will you think? You will first realize that the rules will be broken, others will follow suit, rules and regulations will become a mere scrap of paper, and the organization will be chaotic.

In the daily management work, the more important managers are, the poorer their sense of management role is; the more competent the department heads are, the easier they are to be proud of themselves and always want to surpass the role of the managers; the more powerful and the higher level leaders are, the more likely they are to ignore their own managerial roles intentionally or unintentionally.

In particular, the leaders with higher rights and higher levels should pay more attention to the sense of being managed, because the general managers are not willing to rush to manage the senior leaders. If the higher level is unconscious and has no role consciousness, the problem can be large.

Privileges at the higher level will soon spread to the relevant departments and responsible persons. They will voluntarily grant themselves the privilege, so that the rules and regulations of the organization will become rubber bands and will not work.

Everyone is not equal before the system. Everyone can not be equal before the system. Most people will have an opinion, and the spirit will not be right. It will affect the normal work and the enthusiasm of the staff.

It is the last thing that a leader of the highest power wants to do, but who created it? This is called "cocoon" and gives himself a difficult problem.

How do we do it? We need to tie the bell to solve the bell.

If you are a person who wants to make a career, if you want to make your organization a top-notch brand person, if you want to make your subordinates a good soldier and all excellent employees, please cultivate your sense of management and play the role of being a manager.

Only in this way can you be an excellent manager. Your life will go wider and wider and you will be a successful person and you will enter the peak of your career.

Fourth, play a good role as a leader.

This is often the case. Some people in charge of the Department have a good mass base. That is to say, not only the people in this Department say that he is good and supportive, even if the people around him say he is good, everyone mentioned him praising him well.

Why can't we rise to a higher level leadership position? Maybe the good guys have all the good points, the masses support, colleagues say he is good, the average people praise him enough, this person is good.

Is it in the eyes of leaders that he is not a good cadre? The reason is that such a department leader lacks the sense of leadership, he may be willing to accept the management of the same level department, but he does not want to accept the leadership of the leader of the higher level, not only does he not think this is a crime, but he also wants to accept it.

He showed off his courage and spirit to dare to commit crimes with the same level of people, so he was supported by the masses and praised by colleagues at the same level. At the same time, he was also angry with his leader.

Just imagine, such a person who dare to reuse, that leader is willing to reuse.

Perhaps you will say, "leaders are willing to use the donkey."

In fact, this mistake is not in the leadership, but in the subordinate.

As subordinates, because of the different angles and asymmetric information, he can not be completely consistent with his leadership.

Therefore, when leaders make decisions and give orders, it is better for subordinates to implement them and accept them cheerfully, so as to ensure the quality and quantity of tasks assigned by leaders.

As a leader, it is normal to take some measures and art to mobilize the enthusiasm of the staff. As a subordinate, this should be an initiative to cooperate with the leader, to give full play to his initiative and lead his subordinates to play a positive role, rather than "give me less play. I can not see this trick. This is to let me continue to pull loose, not to be his", or even openly stand up and expose the leader's "trick" and face the leadership.

The good intentions of the original leader made it hard for such a dared leader not to be led by the leadership.

Just imagine, such a subordinate, such a department manager, that leader dare to use, willing to use? I do not think there is a normal leader willing to use unless such a leader has mental disorders or mental disorders.

Leadership is to ensure the realization of organizational goals. We need unity and affinity.

Leaders make decisions, give orders, and take the initiative of leaders to arouse everyone's enthusiasm.

As subordinates, it is natural to execute decisions and orders and accept leadership's art of mobilizing.

Even if you have "broken through" the art of leadership, do not be wise and publicize.

In fact, as subordinates, they should also take the initiative to guess the real intention behind the leadership's art of leadership, and take the initiative to make efforts in the direction of leadership.

Only in this way can the leadership's artistic potential be brought into full play.

Only in this way, as a subordinate, your leading role will be in place.

Of course, you can not cooperate or cooperate with the leader's art of violating discipline.

Actors are supposed to play roles.

It is not an easy task for a middle (interlayer) manager to perform his 4 roles, but it is not a difficult task. The key is whether these 4 kinds of role consciousness exist. With this sense of role, there is a good premise, and the rest is ability.

If these 4 roles are played well, you can say that your career is successful; if your role in life can also be played well, your life will surely be bright, fresh, colorful and magnificent.