To Solve All The Problems Of China'S Economy, We Must Rely On A Large Increase In IPO?

Even if the market turns upside down, there are still some bad feelings in the market. Some people are still in a very excited mood.

Although everyone has some expectations in the improvement of the stock market system, but as investors, shouldn't these fluctuations and changes be in your consideration list? How can you expect all people to make money and no one loses money? Therefore, discussions and suggestions should be balanced and not too severe.

Last week, the chairman of the securities and Futures Commission Liu once again made a sound. This time it was for brokers. Many times, many remarks made the market very sensitive. The market was the virtue. Bulldozers had not entered into Xiong an, and the market had been optimistic about all the Xiong an concept. The flammable ice is still starting. Investors seem to have seen the beautiful scenery of fifty thousand miles in the future. These messages can not affect the fundamentals in the short term, but some people still want to chase them.

For chairman Liu's new voice, pessimists think that speech shows regulatory attitudes, regulatory signals interfere with the market, and brokerages are enterprises, regulators should not interfere in the direction of business.

Optimists believe that regulators want broker dealers to sell their underwriting sponsors from the primary market to the two tier market.

The shift to revitalize the stock is the focus of the new IPO issue, which has been rectified for some time. The regulator has listened to the changes made by the voice of the market.

Just for this speech, individuals support the view of optimists. It is normal for Chinese officials to attend a conference to give speeches. Even the most sensitive and most neutral market area of capital is inevitable, so every good change should be praised.

What we most fear to see is the confrontation between regulation and market. Strict supervision is aimed at any country. We are most afraid to see that there is a confrontation between regulation and market. Strict supervision in any country is aimed at boosting confidence and boosting credibility of market information disclosure. The Americans have the Sarbanes act to prevent Enron from repeating itself.

Capital market does not advocate any responsibility or obligation. The basic relationship of stock market is contractual relationship. Stock is part of the rights and interests of a company.

and

The purpose is to make information disclosure true and reliable.

Regulation is regulation, just like 1 is 1, what needs should not be entrapped.

Therefore, the direction of regulation must be to boost the confidence of all investors, not the confidence of prices, but the confidence of fairness and fairness. In this respect, many people in the market have problems in their arguments.

Some people try to tell the market that the market is wrong, and think that the stock market is used for issuing stocks. Therefore, the unlimited expansion of IPO is correct. It is the collective foolishness of investors that leads to wrong opinions. They even think that all the problems in solving China's economy must rely on a large increase in IPO.

Individuals disagree with this view.

We strongly oppose the cessation of IPO, but if more than 7 of the investors in the market think that IPO should be reduced, then IPO should be reduced to restore confidence and whether the quality of the IPO target can not boost market confidence and whether the pricing of IPO is unreasonable.

Because the number of publisher is fixed, the price earnings ratio is generally stable, which is not market oriented.

The best condition is that IPO should be changed from submitting an application to an active invitation.

Those companies that are not willing to go on the market should take the initiative to invite them. For those industries that seem to be a big decline in performance, although the books are full of faces, they must listen to the opinions of the market.

This is what the mature market calls IPO to boost market confidence.

Why do the Hong Kong stocks have the "Ding Crab Effect"? Because in the 90s of last century, those manipulations were still existing in Hong Kong stocks, and the short selling organizations had made a lot of investment in Hong Kong stocks. So if Hongkong has innovation, those innovations are also on the financial real estate and legal services, and the technology industry has run to Shenzhen.

In Hongkong, the best stocks are headquartered in Shenzhen, such as Hong Kong stock's top three cattle shares, Tencent, Tencent or Tencent.

And the Hong Kong stock exchange board is also the hardest hit by thousands of shares.

A few days ago, the Hong Kong stock regulatory authorities were adjusting some policies, such as the issue of different rights listing on the same stock market, for example, the problem of pforming the gem into a garbage board. The market saw these problems early. Supervision is only catering to the expectations of the whole market, rather than comparing with the market, because the market is always right.

For more information, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats and Internet cafes.