Comment On The US Side'S Suppression Of The Jitter Is A Farce.

Shen Yi, director and researcher of cyberspace Governance Research Center, Fudan University

In October 2019, "jitter" became the victim of the little action in the name of the so-called "national security" of the United States. The Facebook company, which has a competitive interest, accused accusations with unwarranted accusations. The foreign investment review board had to trace the source of the normal business M & A activities in the US; Marco Rubio, a Republican known for its lack of political speculation at the bottom line, gave a small report to the Treasury Department of the United States, asking for a review of a takeover of the parent company bypassing two years ago by Rubio.

There is no doubt that this is a farce, the background of which is the systematic change caused by the increasingly marked changes in the overall strength of China and the United States. Fundamentally speaking, the change of the system is determined by the governance capability of the Chinese and American governments and the governance system of China and the United States. After all, the Chinese government has stood in the forefront of the current historical progress in accordance with the requirements of technological development, and some US forces have tried hard to maintain their so-called hegemonic position in a variety of ways by blocking the trend of technological development and distorting the way forward. The root cause is that the US side is unwilling to touch on the distribution structure of vested interests in China, and even hopes to achieve some speculative "problem solving" by means of "being ill and taking medicine in China". This is doomed to failure, but because of the relative strength of the United States itself, there will be repeated attempts in different places to try the same solution to try to get different results, from ZTE to HUAWEI, from big to tremble.

First of all, the US companies that once occupied the first half advantage and gained the monopoly position are more inclined to attack the challengers from China through non market means, rather than make efforts to make adjustments to adapt to the innovation of technological iteration and business application mode. The face is the key sponsor of this trembling sound. There is no doubt that before 2010, Facebook is the king of shaping the global social media platform. Now it is a typical super platform, one of the monopolistic oligopolies of social media. However, as pointed out by the Research Report of Morgan, 2009, the development of information technology has a typical "jumping" feature: it is not continuous but jumps, and the latecomer who can seize the opportunity can form a significant advantage in the market for the first mover. Apple is more typical than NOKIA. The advantage of using the mobile Internet in the field of voice and video is also a classic case. As a monopolistic enterprise, Facebook's choice is to use the US government to worry about China's national security, to launch a "national security" threat accusation against trill, and to suppress innovation in a non economic way. This is the inevitable choice for monopolist, and Facebook company has lost the courage to face innovation challenges.

Secondly, irrational national security anxiety dominates the decision-making circle in Washington, which leads to some distortions in the US side's decisions. Starting from the relationship between Protestant Ethics and capitalist development, Max Webb's view that the religious beliefs of the strategic elites of the developed countries in Europe and America tend to bring about a crucial consequence is that the conversion of state power is usually interpreted unconsciously as a loss of God's blessing. From a practical perspective, the elite of Europe and the United States know very well that the core and key of the US hegemony facing China's relative decline is always the internal expansion of financial capital, but this is the necessity of capitalism, that is to say, it is destined to find a way and strategy that can not be cured to respond to the so-called strategic threat. This universal anxiety is spreading throughout the decision-making circles of Washington, whether it is the trembling sound of this time or the HUAWEI before.

Third, it stems from the political culture of its show oriented political system. In the words of comparative theory, in order to ensure the continuous acquisition of surplus value and ensure that financial capital can maintain the overwhelming superiority position, the superstructure of the United States has formed a structural stability mechanism. The knowledge related to the political process and the objective political practice are systematically guided to the direction of fragmentation, entertainment, symbolization and formalization.

Rubio is a typical example: he is the kind of opportunistic politician who can fake his own date of birth and the key information of his parents in order to win the election, and it is also the kind of performing politician who is used to biting other countries to show his love for the United States. As far as he is concerned, the prestige and image that are indispensable in the long-term interests of the United States are more than Rubio's political future and election. This kind of politician who can ignore the flood in order to win the election will play an important role in the course of this attack and the encirclement and suppression of all kinds of high-tech enterprises.

To shake the voice, and to follow all kinds of Chinese enterprises that are destined to springing up like mushrooms, the challenges faced by such a former ZTE, HUAWEI, Dajiang and so on are, to a certain extent, a rare quality identification and quality certification, and also a typical example of China's sustainable development. Through this tortuous road, we will usher in a better tomorrow and an unstoppable pace of China's development.