Bai Yansong Revealed The "Superior" Subconsciousness.

Bai Yansong is undoubtedly the "heavyweight" moderator of CCTV. There are a lot of commentary shots of Mr. Bai Yansong in every major event report and in-depth analysis.

Bai Yansong's eloquence is no doubt powerful. His thinking (if not read by the prompting board) is also flexible and broad. But after all these years, Mr. Bai Yansong's impression of the grass roots is that his face is getting more and more familiar; secondly, his language is becoming more and more unfamiliar.

The first point is not clear. The reason for the second point is that Mr. Bai Yansong's language style seems to be far from being popular and civilian.

Every weekend's "one week" program, looking at Mr. Bai Yansong's endless comment on news events, the grass people thought that it was not like a presiding over the news service for the overwhelming majority of the hundreds of millions of TV audience. It was like a scholar who stood on the podium of his alma mater's Peking University.

Recently, Tibetan independence separatists plotted and carried out the beating and burning riots in Lhasa, and were being overthrown by the Western politicians and the western media by the Olympic torch outside the country, distorting, stigma, and rumors to suppress the so-called "freedom, human rights and democracy". Connivance and Bao Bicang interfered alone, destroyed the torch pmission abroad, humiliated China and humiliated the Chinese nation.

The most abominable and despicable is the developed countries of the United States and Europe, which are regarded as "international mainstream society" by the domestic intellectual elite, among which France's behavior is the most despicable.

This act of resisting China and insulting China is appalling and shameless.

To this end, the patriotic passion of the Chinese people, especially the young people in the hearts of the Chinese and overseas, has erupted almost instantaneously. There is no official background, no official documents, no diplomatic language, no pretense, no hum and Whig, only pure love, only hot love, only anger, only grand, only resolute.

However, behind this magnificent and global Chinese patriotic feat, there are some honest gentlemen who regard themselves as "deep", "rational", "elegant" and "fair". What are the "truth", what "nationalistic sentiments", what "righteousness groups" are, what "Cultural Revolution restoration" and what are they talking about?

To a deeper level, these people behind these remarks always put themselves in a "rational" and "moral" highland. They carry coffee and look down on the high underground people, disdain and point out, because they have relied on the "true pmission" of universal values, so they have been "superior to one person", in other words, a sense of "higher Chinese" that has already entered the mainstream society of the world before all the people.

As French politicians and media are disrupting the Olympic torch relay's bad deeds, some Chinese people have launched a boycott of the French retail giant's Carrefour chain store in China due to the serious distortion and rumors of the French media in the relevant reports.

It is not clear how the "boycott" and "boycott" can be achieved.

Nor do the grass people think such a boycott can bring about any substantial changes in the prejudices and arrogance of French politicians and media.

But the grass farmers believe that this is nothing more than a signal released by Chinese consumers, that is, in the face of the fundamental interests and national feelings of the Chinese nation, ordinary people can use their legitimate means to send out their own aspirations and express their feelings.

It is not necessary to rise, nor to belittle.

However, some people came out to express "higher". During the great patriotic movement of the Chinese people all over the world, they had already expressed several "high", and the "southern people" who were the climax of "Tibet: truth and national sentiments" by the deputy editor in chief of Nandu weekly in the financial times, and with the help of "boycott Carrefour", issued several "higher" voices, but this "south" issued the voice of He Yanguang and Bai Yansong.

In April 16th, the Southern Metropolis Daily published a report that Bai Yansong objected to boycott Carrefour: "don't punish yourself with other people's mistakes". The subtitle is "the famous journalists objected to boycott Carrefour He Yanguang: I was also a cynic. I do not boycott Carrefour Bai Yansong: don't punish yourself with others' mistakes." the opening paragraph, "He Yanguang, the image director of China Youth Daily and one of China's most famous photographers."

Bai Yansong, the host of CCTV, one of the most famous TV personalities in China.

On the two day, they published their opinions against boycott Carrefour online.

The Southern Metropolis Daily takes Bai Yansong as the title, of course, with the help of Bai Yansong's "influence". The subtext is "you see, even Bai Yansong says" no! "

The grass people thought that Bai Yansong's words had nothing to do with the ordinary people who participated in or did not participate in the boycott of Carrefour. They all had their own reasons. Bai Yansong did not go, which did not mean that others had gone wrong, or Bai Yansong's fault. However, the title of "famous journalists opposed to boycott Carrefour" reflected the appeal. It seemed that "famous journalists" were more "weighed" because of their "famous".

But in fact, it is not necessarily that Bai Yansong has always shown his "maxim" demeanour. "Not going to Carrefour is a personal matter. Even if many people refuse to go to Carrefour because of boycott, I believe that there will be quite a lot of Carrefour on that day.

Because for an individual, life should not be disturbed by politics. Let alone punish yourself with other people's mistakes, which is too much for others. "

The grass people thought that Mr. Bai Yansong's so-called "because for individuals, life should not be subject to political interference; let alone take other people's mistakes to punish themselves, which is too much for other people's face."

The premise is that not going to Carrefour will cause "days" to be "disturbed" by politics. Instead of Carrefour, it is "punishing oneself" and leaving Carrefour, "days" become "difficult".

But this premise does not exist, because in addition to Carrefour, there are a large number of different supermarkets, such as Beijing, there are "wumi" supermarket chains and "Hualian" chain supermarkets, and their scale is not lost to Carrefour.

Consumers are not going to go to the supermarket stores where homogenization is so competitive. Is it "punishing themselves" at a glance, and Mr. Bai Yansong is so philosophical.

Especially Mr. Bai Yansong's sentence [May 1st, I certainly do not go to Carrefour, script src=>.