Evaluation Report On Competitiveness Of China'S Textile And Garment Enterprises In 07-08

Under the direct guidance of the leadership of the China Textile Industry Association, the evaluation of the competitiveness of China's textile and garment enterprises has been carried out for six years from 2003 to now.

In the past six years, the evaluation and research work has been carried out continuously, and the data acquisition channels have been continuously developed, the evaluation indexes have been revised, and the evaluation system has been perfected. The aim is to provide a reliable basis for the vast number of textile and garment enterprises to objectively evaluate their competitiveness, confirm their positioning in the industry, and provide scientific and quantitative indicators for further promotion of the competitiveness of enterprises.

In the evaluation of the competitiveness of China's textile and garment enterprises this year, new evaluation indicators were introduced to further improve the evaluation system.

The current textile and clothing competitiveness evaluation work compared with the previous changes.

This is mainly reflected in the following aspects:

First, the scope of evaluation enterprises has been expanded.

In the past years of competitiveness evaluation, we only assessed the work of cotton spinning (yarn dyed), wool spinning, chemical fiber, linen spinning, silk, printing and dyeing, knitting, garments and so on, and finally determined the top ten competitive top twenty companies.

In the current competitiveness evaluation work, we first introduced the comprehensive evaluation of the top 500 industries to the enterprises declaring data. The home textile and textile machinery industry was also included in the evaluation scope, so that the number of enterprises participating in the evaluation was expanded, and the number of superior enterprises launched was more than before.

Second, we strengthened the Internet data delivery channel.

In order to facilitate the enterprises to take part in the data evaluation of the competitiveness evaluation, the China Textile Industry Association has opened an online reporting channel, which has become the main channel for enterprises to submit competitive annual reports and statistical quarterly reports, so as to facilitate the reporting of enterprise data, improve the efficiency of enterprise reporting, and mobilize the enthusiasm of enterprises to participate more widely.

Third, a new data audit process has been established.

This year's competitiveness evaluation and evaluation team adopted the automated model for the first time to complete the audit process, which greatly improved the efficiency and effectiveness of the audit.

Fourth, according to the requirements of the development of the industry, new evaluation indicators have been added.

On the basis of previous concerns about the growth and profitability of enterprises and the innovation and development, we have further focused on corporate social responsibility and intangible assets indicators. We have increased the indicators of social responsibility, including energy conservation, emission reduction, social security, tax contribution and so on. We have also added individual indicators such as Chinese famous brands and well-known trademarks in the comprehensive index of intangible assets, thus further enriching the evaluation level.

The improved competitiveness evaluation system is composed of two elements: the standard data of basic data and the standard value of the popularity index.

Among them, the standard value of basic data is composed of many sub-systems, such as human quality, asset quality, quick response ability, innovation ability, profitability, scale level, growth ability, social responsibility and so on.

Each subsystem has a set of specific assessment indicators, such as "profitability" to assess enterprise cost and profit margins, profit margins, turnover of current assets and total assets contribution rate; "innovation capability" mainly examines R & D investment ratio, product value-added rate, innovation performance, intangible assets index and so on.

In the whole evaluation system, the weights of all kinds of indicators are also invited by authoritative experts from Peking University, Yunnan University, Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Academy of Social Sciences, National Research Center and national information center.

The weight of the newly increased 500 industry wide evaluation system this year is obtained by weighting the average weight of each sub sector, so that the whole evaluation system can be more scientific and reasonable as far as possible, so as to describe the competitiveness of enterprises as objectively as possible.

The survey content of the standard value of popularity index includes three contents: popularity, comprehensive level, and development confidence.

According to this evaluation system, the competitiveness evaluation of China's textile and garment enterprises in 2007-2008 is based on the enterprise's status and business data in 2007. Through the evaluation of the model system and combined with the expert evaluation, the list of the top 10 competitive enterprises (20 strong) and the 500 competitive industries of the whole industry is finally determined.

For the top 150 excellent enterprises in the 500 competitive industries of the whole industry, we call them the top five star enterprises in China's textile and garment enterprises, and 200 excellent enterprises in the middle are called the 500 strong four star enterprises of China's textile and garment enterprises. The top 150 outstanding enterprises are called the Chinese textile and garment enterprises with the competitiveness of 500 strong Samsung enterprises.

The main characteristics of this textile and garment enterprise competitiveness evaluation result are reflected.

First, the backbone role of the top 500 enterprises in the whole industry is very prominent.

The industry's top 500 competitive enterprises, which were evaluated in this year, achieved 1 billion 568 million yuan per household gross industrial output value in 2007, and 101 million yuan per household profit. They were 22.84 times and 34.89 times the average industrial gross output and household profit respectively.

The average output value and profit of the five star enterprises are 48.28 times and 89.61 times the average level of the industry. The average output value and profit of the four star enterprises are 15.42 times and 16.34 times of the industry average, and the average output value and profit of the three star enterprises are 6.88 times and 4.88 times the industry average respectively.

The average profit rate of the top 500 industries is 5.87%, which is 1.5 percentage points higher than that of the whole industry. Among them, five-star enterprises are 2.42 percentage points higher than the average level of the industry.

The data show that the average size and efficiency level of the top 500 enterprises in the industry are far higher than the average level of the industry.

Second, the competitiveness of the 10 industries (20 strong) in various industries is steadily improving.

The 10 largest (20 strong) enterprises selected in the industry now have an average labor productivity of 88 thousand yuan / person, an increase of 1.99% over the previous year, a profit margin of 7.09%, an increase of 1 percentage points over the previous year, and a 7.52% profit margin profit ratio of 1.02 percentage points over the previous year.

Specifically, from the sub sectors, the average profit margin of the top 10 enterprises in garment industry reached 9.15%, an increase of 0.92 percentage points over the previous year, and the average profit margin of the 20 competitive enterprises in the cotton textile industry reached 7.34%, an increase of 0.97 percentage points over the previous year, and the average profit rate of the 10 enterprises in the wool textile industry reached 7.98%, an increase of 1.16 percentage points over the previous year.

Third, the competitiveness of the 10 industries (20 strong) in various industries has been continuously enhanced.

The top 10 enterprises (20 strong) in the industry, the average R & D investment accounted for 2.84% of the main business income, 1.62 percentage points higher than the previous year, and 31.6% of innovation performance, 13.14 percentage points higher than the previous year.

Judging from the sub sectors, the innovation ability of the apparel industry is the most prominent. The average R & D investment of the top 10 enterprises in the apparel industry accounted for 9.42% of the main business income, which is 8.6 percentage points higher than that of the previous year.

Fourth, the competitiveness of the top 10 enterprises (20 strong) is outstanding.

The energy consumption per unit of output value of the 10 strong (20 strong) enterprises in this industry has decreased by more than 22% over the previous year, and the water consumption per unit output value has decreased by more than 20% over the previous year.

Among them, cotton spinning, clothing, chemical fiber, silk four industries of the dominant enterprises in the work of energy saving and consumption performance is particularly prominent.

Fifth, the scale of enterprises is an important indicator of competitiveness, but it is not an indicator of positive proportions.

In the top 500 enterprises, the size of five-star, four-star and Samsung enterprises are distributed between 1~300 billion yuan, not the larger the larger the competitiveness of enterprises.

Of course, we should also see that many advantageous enterprises still have much room for improvement.

Many of our R & D investment and information input are very low, which is quite different from the advanced level of the world.

For example, the average information input of the top 500 enterprises accounted for only 0.8% of the main revenue, and the obvious investment was insufficient, showing that the rapid response capability of the enterprises was generally weak. The average R & D investment of the 500 strong Samsung enterprises was only 0.73%, the contribution of new products was not high, and the innovation capability and development potential would be discounted.

These are the aspects that need to be widely noticed and improved in the enterprise competitiveness system.

Through this evaluation work, we deeply realized that the core of "enhancing technological innovation" and "brand innovation" is to enhance the competitiveness of enterprises.

We hope that the enterprises will continue to work actively to improve the contribution rate of technology and the contribution rate of brand to achieve technological innovation, product innovation and management innovation, consolidate and enhance the results of operation. At the same time, we hope that the top 500 enterprises can not actively compare advanced, find gaps, and strive to improve their competitiveness.

I believe that with the joint efforts of the whole industry, we will realize the dream of "textile power" faster.