China'S "Camel" Shoes Are Plated With Beautiful Titles. Consumers Will Be Accused In Court.

Recently, Zhang bought a pair of "American Camel" casual shoes, and found that the "Camel" trademark of these shoes was originally China, not the United States. It believed that the seller and the manufacturer were fraudulent. Therefore, the Beijing Hualian comprehensive supermarket company Shijingshan branch and Shishi Hao shoe industry Co., Ltd., together with the Shijingshan people's court, asked the two defendants to stop immediately the fraudulent propaganda behavior of fraudulent consumers, and asked the Beijing Hualian comprehensive supermarket company Shijingshan branch to double return 740 yuan.

At 9 a.m. on May 7th, the people's Court of Shijingshan District, Beijing, publicly heard the case.

In the spring of 2008, Zhang lawyer, who was shopping in Shijingshan Hualian, was attracted by "American Camel" casual shoes. After observing the sales environment and the sale of "American Camel" casual shoes, he noticed that the addresses of "the American Camel" and "the American Camel International Invest Enterprise Ltd (authorized)" were the symbols of many places, such as counters and shoe boxes.

Zhang has bought a pair of camel shoes for his recognition and trust in the brand of American companies.

As Lawyer Zhang focuses on intellectual property lawyer business, in order to know more about his "American Camel" leather shoes, the registered trademark of "camel and picture" registered by the registration number is a Chinese citizen named "Wan Jin Kong" rather than a American Camel International Invest Enterprise Ltd.

Because of his professional sensitivity, Zhang felt that the trademark was in question, so he collected relevant information and found the problem: Wan Jingang was allowed to register the camel and the trademark, and renewed his registration. After that, he allowed the camel investment company of the us to use camel and the registered trademark. After that, American Camel International Invest Enterprise Ltd allowed Shishi Hao Shoe Co., Ltd. to use the camel brand and the registered trademark.

Zhang believes that the purpose of the two defendants' false propaganda and misleading consumers has been very clear. It is clearly a registered camel brand registered by a Chinese. After some painstaking design, it has been packaged into an American Camel. It has also achieved the expected commercial publicity effect objectively, making consumers mistaken that the camel brand is the brand of the American company. The shoes they buy are American Camel shoes. He asked the two defendants to label the original information of the trademarks on the same commodity packages they purchased.

In the course of the trial, Zhang said that the purpose of his prosecution was to prompt producers and sellers to sell products in this way. It is inappropriate for them to regulate relevant trademarks and information. In addition, he added Wang Jin Gang and American Camel International Invest Enterprise Ltd as co defendants.

Shijingshan Hualian argued that "Camel Leather shoes" are American brands or Chinese brands are not within the scope of its review, and questioned Zhang's consumer status.

Shishi Hao Mei Shoes Co., Ltd. raised jurisdiction objection.

The case was subsequently adjourned.