The "Sexy" Of Female Workplace Practice Is Not Equal To Exposure.

On the cover of a magazine, five pouted women are staring at the lens. The lips are slightly open with lipstick, the shoulders are raised, the jeans are tight, the hair is flirtatious and scattered on the eyes, and the full chest is even more visible.

However, this is not a male magazine.

These women are neither the wives of football players returned from Germany, nor the cast of Desperate Housewives.

On the contrary, this is a magazine of Management Today. They are all rising British business stars.

The five women who were interested in the fire were selected from 35 women who were the highest in 35 years of age.

There are more pictures in the magazine, showing more tights and more sexy eyes.

I can't help but wonder, where do all these sexy expressions come from?

Has sex exposed culture entered the British workplace?

For many years, women dressed like men are now showing off in the workplace.

Last week, I was thinking about these problems in a sandwich shop near my office.

I glanced aside, and saw a big three or four inch cleavage.

Judging from the woman's overall behavior, she is not an ordinary employee, but a manager, perhaps at a high level.

She was inspired by her appearance, and I launched a "on-site audit".

When I bought a cheeseburger sandwich and a cup of mango yogurt, I saw 8 cleavages, many of which were accompanied by bare shoulders and large, uncovered backs.

Based on these scientific achievements (and more studies done in the next 48 hours), I can confirm that the exposure of office women has reached unprecedented levels.

I estimate that this "meat fashion" has something to do with hot weather.

However, that is not an excuse: even the most stupid person should be able to understand that the beach is a beach and the office is totally different.

But is this difference so great that women who work in offices should never be provocative?

My answer is, it depends on how you do it.

In my opinion, vulgar is always wrong.

Pouted lips are vulgar, so is the suspenders and the large trunking cleavage.

A lot of these things are like: let's have a look.

This may be nothing, but at the same time, sexual harassment provisions mean that any male found to be seen may be severely punished.

This is not to say that the office should be a neutral zone.

That is neither possible nor appropriate.

In the office, men always look at women with lustful eyes. This is the reality of life.

To prevent such a situation, it may only be possible for all women to wear Muslim robes or to make men and women naked.

Neither of these two methods is acceptable.

When you enter a different office, you will find the energy of sex.

Some offices are many, and others are less.

High level of sexual energy can be a good thing: women wear high-heeled shoes, walking and swaying (men are also glamorous). Working in an office like this can be more exhilarating, not in offices where everyone wears high necked shirts and Hush Puppies.

However, it is very difficult to accurately grasp the bottom line.

There was a time when successful women were dressed like men in suits and shoes.

That era is over - this is a good thing, but the new rules of dress are not yet clear.

I want to say that sexy is not wrong, and it may become a good weapon for promotion, but it must be reserved.

I know two women who are not very young.

They are wearing sexy suits but are not exposed.

They all know how to use their femininity to control men in their hands.

This is not the only way to promote women, but it is really a way. I don't think there is any problem with this.

Yes, that's not fair, because men can't use the same skills.

Yes, that's not fair, because a stout, plain looking woman can't do that either.

But career promotion is not known for fairness. I sincerely hope that women who use sexy weapons will get good luck.

Before I put aside this topic, I want to provide another explanation for the photos in today's management magazine.

That's the problem with photographers, not women.

I have had such a miserable experience and I know how it happened.

Recently, a female magazine wanted to take photos of me. Three people took three suitcases full of cosmetics and blowers to take photos and spent 4.5 hours.

In the end, I was exhausted and wanted to end, so when they asked me - ridiculously and dangerously - lying on the back of the sofa, I had no objection.

They told me: cross your feet at your ankles, move your right buttocks forward, and look directly at the lens.

As long as I can let them leave my house, even if I am naked, I will not hesitate to do so.

When my youngest son saw the picture, he frowned and asked me, "Mom, why are you trying to make a sexy look?"

With this idea, I called five of the most beautiful and sexiest women in the cover girl and asked if she felt she was being cheated and looked like that.

No, she said.

These photos are meant to look like "avant-garde", that is to say, "we are like humans", that is, we need to "break through the old image".

At least for the last point, she is right.

This picture breaks through the old image of a successful woman in a suit suit.

But replacing female images with the vulgar footballers' wives is by no means an improvement.