Home >

A Manager Who Wants To Be A Scholar Is Not A Good Manager.

2010/8/4 18:07:00 74

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

As we all know, from the perspective of the part of speech of a word, in ancient China, scholar is a commendatory word, a symbol of a cultural man, and a symbol of a person's status.

However, in real life, the term "Scholar" is rather satirical and derogatory. The POS is similar to a derogatory term, and the reason is that these "Scholar" do not understand the worldly wisdom and scholar spirit, and result in the fact that they lead to high and low quality.

In particular, the story of the scholar who called "the paymaster came over" became almost a laughing stock.

So in real life,

Administration

What is the similarity between the leader of the class and the word "Scholar"?

Actually, in reality, there are a lot of professionals.

enterprise

Managers, especially those who have been

major

Managers of training,

MBA

Students like to play the role of "Scholar". They display their professionalism and knowledge in the process of management practice. They like to use their own professional language as management terminology to guide management practice, and the result is often counterproductive and everywhere.

In fact, the so-called management language is the language of the manager, choosing some easy to understand language instead of Wen Zou Zou's words, but it can achieve the desired results. For example, "all reactionaries are paper tigers", "black cats, white cats, can catch mice, are good cats" and so on. These management slogans are easy to read and easy to remember and understand. They do not need training to know what they mean and have high pmission efficiency.

Therefore, the language of management is not an effective management language. The language of management should refer to the language of those managers.

In addition, "corporate culture" is also a low level plation term. So far many managers may not even know themselves.

Therefore, many corporate culture has become slogans and can not be implemented at all.

How do we implement things that we do not understand? In fact, it also requires a lot of training for employees to let everyone know that "culture" is not "culture".

In fact, corporate culture is equivalent to the style of every family, which is as simple as our own character.

For example, the slogan of "good virtue and good health" is China Mobile's corporate culture, and China Mobile promotes it vigorously. However, it is estimated that tens of thousands of mobile employees may not know what it means, while another corporate culture "changes destiny with both hands". Almost all Chinese people understand it. This is the language that managers should use.

In short, the meaning of management is simplifying complex problems, popularizing professional problems and serialization of scattered problems.

Only in this way can management result.

And this requires managers to simplify themselves, use theory to guide management practices, and finally practice theory to innovate, instead of becoming an ancient scholar, hoping that managers will make more efforts.