Home >

2010 Fatal Terms Shocked The Eyeball.

2010/8/7 15:27:00 44

??? 日本語 Fran?ais English 中文

Incident review:

"In August 5th, a shoe store employee reported to the Southern Metropolis Daily.

Yi Er Kang

Guangzhou branch of shoe industry group requires all employees in Hainan to pay their own money, buy the new shoes produced by the company as employees' shoes, and buy one pair in the first half and the second half of the year.

The staff thought it was unreasonable and hoped that the media would be exposed.

The reporter saw the letter from the Guangzhou branch of the Yi Kang shoes group in August 2nd to fax to all the branches in Hainan. The above second stipulates: 1 pairs of shoes every year, 1 pairs in the first half of the year and 1 pairs in the second half of the year. They must wear seasonal shoes and wear shoes of other brands or old ones. Otherwise, the shop manager will pay 40 yuan / time, and the employees will be punished by 20 yuan / time.

The date indicated on the notice indicates that the letter has been drawn up for more than a month and has only recently been sent to Hainan.

The official said that letting employees wear their own brand shoes is to promote brand image, and that employees buy some cost price.

This may be a good idea from the perspective of corporate propaganda, but from the perspective of employees there is some suspicion of coercion.

Why companies do not regard this behavior as

Employee welfare

Why do employees not pay as much as they deserve for living advertisements? Instead, they have to pay their own money. Many employees will not understand it, so complaints are inevitable.

The company has not established effective communication, management methods are rude, statutory working hours are low wages, etc.

These problems directly led to the tragedy of employees, so enterprises should abandon the "overlord clause" and adopt more humane management.

I have interviewed the chairman of Wanfeng inks, a famous shoe making enterprise in China. He put forward the management policy of "letting employees love enterprises", rather than forcing them, but letting employees take charge of enterprises. Many behaviors are voluntary by employees, turning passive demands into active participation, thus forming a very good working atmosphere.

Actually, before that.

Foxconn

The "Lian jump" incident is a case worthy of reflection by entrepreneurs.

A "Foxconn netizens observation group" provides a "Foxconn case report" formed after personal experience and field visits. It points out the nine major problems existing in the treatment and management of Foxconn employees.

It involves illegal procedures such as illegal trade unions, illegal scolding and restriction of personal freedom in Foxconn, violation of labor laws, overtime work, signing of overlord clauses with new employees, and restrictions on employees in disguised form.

Editor's note: I hope something like this will never happen again.