• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Guangdong Concluded BELLE Trademark Infringement Case

    2010/9/28 16:21:00 36

    BELLE SandalsSlippers

    Recently, the Nanshan District people's Court of Shenzhen city of Guangdong province concluded the "BELLE" trademark infringement case in accordance with the law, and ordered the defendant to immediately stop selling the goods that infringe the plaintiff's "BELLE" trademark exclusive rights, and compensate the plaintiff's economic loss for 15000 days within ten days from the date the judgment comes into force.


    The court found that in July 28, 2002, after the approval of the State Trademark Office, the plaintiff Lihua Shoes Trade Co., Ltd. approved the registration of the No. 1815147th letter trademark "BELLE", and approved the use of commodities in twenty-fifth categories, including shoes and sports shoes. The validity period of registration was from July 28, 2002 to July 27, 2012.

    In February 21, 2004, approved by the State Trademark Office, the plaintiff obtained the Trademark No. 3086374th, "BELLE", which was approved and registered, and approved the use of commodities in twenty-fifth categories, including shoes, boots and belts. The validity period of registration was from February 21, 2004 to February 20, 2014.

    In January 28, 2007, approved by the State Trademark Office, the plaintiff obtained the 3809517th letter trademark "BeLLE", and approved the use of commodities in twenty-fifth categories, including shoes, boots, sports shoes, and so on.

    Sandals

    ,

    Slipper

    Travel shoes; the valid period of registration is from January 28, 2007 to January 27, 2017.

    In September 22, 2009, the notary public notary of Shenzhen, Dong Mou, notary office staff, Mr. Mo and the applicant Lihua Shoes Trade Co., Ltd. entrusted the agent xiaomou and Liu to come near a subway station near the window of the world.

    Shoe store

    Xiaomou and Liu bought two pairs of shoes (a pair of BELLE shoes and a pair of Staccato shoes), and got a receipt on the spot. After shopping, they took two photos of the shop.

    After the purchase, the notaries sealed the goods.

    In accordance with the above process, the notary office has produced (2009) Notarial Certificate No. 150581st.

    In the trial, the box seal was attached to the notarial box, and a pair of women's leather shoes were found in the package. After viewing, the shoes were marked with "BELLE" trademark.


    The court held that, according to the relevant evidence of the trademark registration certificate submitted by the plaintiff, the plaintiff is the trademark owner of the trademark "BELLE" and "trademark BeLLE" of No. 1815147th, and the exclusive right to use the trademark shall be protected according to law in the validity period of the trademark mentioned above, and no organization or individual shall infringe upon it.

    According to article fifty-second (1) and (two) of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China, "the act of using the same or similar trademark on the same commodity or similar commodity without the permission of the trademark registrant" and "selling goods that infringe the exclusive right of the trademark" are infringed on the exclusive right to use registered trademarks.

    The women's shoes sold by the defendant belong to the registered trademark of the plaintiff and the scope of commodities approved for use. At the same time, the marks highlighted in the preceding commodities are the same as the plaintiff's registered trademarks and are not permitted by the plaintiff. Therefore, the commodities mentioned above are commodities that infringe the exclusive rights of registered trademarks.

    The evidence cited by the defendant does not have the power to prove the legal origin of the goods mentioned above, so the act has constituted a trademark infringement. The defendant should bear the corresponding liability in addition to stopping the infringement immediately.

    The court made the decision.


    At present, the verdict has been legally effective.

    • Related reading

    Famous Medicine Magnetic Shoes Deceived Patients Were Exposed

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/9/26 10:47:00
    39

    Us FDRA Helps Putian Shoe Enterprises Deal With EU REACH Regulations

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/9/18 14:11:00
    56

    Putian Shoe Companies Actively Respond To EU REACH Regulations

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/9/17 9:57:00
    41

    Tianjin Has Seized 20450 Pairs Of Fake Brand Leather Shoes And Sports Shoes.

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/9/4 10:48:00
    60

    廈門查獲售假匡威運動鞋窩點

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/8/31 15:13:00
    32
    Read the next article

    Novice Costumes: Big Cities, Goods, Quality And Cheap Are Mistaken Ideas.

    Good goods are not necessarily concentrated in the popular wholesale market. This view is mainly for bulk stores and retail shopkeepers, that is, the quality of goods is better and the price is not high. Take Guangzhou for example, Guangzhou's white horse market is very popular, but the price is not acceptable to the general retail outlets.

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五月天 | 亚洲毛片无码专区亚洲乱| 亚洲欧美一区二区久久| 三级在线看中文字幕完整版| 色天使色婷婷丁香久久综合| 欧美人成网站免费大全| 国产精品香蕉在线一区| 亚洲日韩中文字幕一区| 8x8x华人永久免费视频| 欧美日韩精彩视频| 尤物国产精品福利三区| 再深点灬舒服灬免费观看| 一品道一本香蕉视频| 福利小视频在线观看| 天天狠天天透天干天天怕∴| 亚洲黄色在线视频| 97se亚洲国产综合自在线| 欧美日韩国产精品| 国产精品vⅰdeoXXXX国产| 久操免费在线观看| 野花日本中文版免费观看| 无人在线观看视频高清视频8| 啊灬啊灬啊灬快灬深高潮了| 一区二区三区四区视频| 猴哥影院在线播放视频| 国产香蕉国产精品偷在线| 亚洲人成在线播放网站| 黄色在线视频网| 新婚熄与翁公试婚小说| 六月婷婷激情综合| 99re这里有免费视频精品| 瓮红电影三级在线播放| 小明发布永久在线成人免费| 人妻av一区二区三区精品| 3d动漫精品一区二区三区| 武则天一边上朝一边做h| 在线精品无码字幕无码av| 亚洲国产欧美日韩一区二区| 成人免费在线看片| 成年女人毛片免费播放人| 亚洲香蕉在线观看|