• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Guangdong Concluded BELLE Trademark Infringement Case

    2010/9/28 16:21:00 36

    BELLE SandalsSlippers

    Recently, the Nanshan District people's Court of Shenzhen city of Guangdong province concluded the "BELLE" trademark infringement case in accordance with the law, and ordered the defendant to immediately stop selling the goods that infringe the plaintiff's "BELLE" trademark exclusive rights, and compensate the plaintiff's economic loss for 15000 days within ten days from the date the judgment comes into force.


    The court found that in July 28, 2002, after the approval of the State Trademark Office, the plaintiff Lihua Shoes Trade Co., Ltd. approved the registration of the No. 1815147th letter trademark "BELLE", and approved the use of commodities in twenty-fifth categories, including shoes and sports shoes. The validity period of registration was from July 28, 2002 to July 27, 2012.

    In February 21, 2004, approved by the State Trademark Office, the plaintiff obtained the Trademark No. 3086374th, "BELLE", which was approved and registered, and approved the use of commodities in twenty-fifth categories, including shoes, boots and belts. The validity period of registration was from February 21, 2004 to February 20, 2014.

    In January 28, 2007, approved by the State Trademark Office, the plaintiff obtained the 3809517th letter trademark "BeLLE", and approved the use of commodities in twenty-fifth categories, including shoes, boots, sports shoes, and so on.

    Sandals

    ,

    Slipper

    Travel shoes; the valid period of registration is from January 28, 2007 to January 27, 2017.

    In September 22, 2009, the notary public notary of Shenzhen, Dong Mou, notary office staff, Mr. Mo and the applicant Lihua Shoes Trade Co., Ltd. entrusted the agent xiaomou and Liu to come near a subway station near the window of the world.

    Shoe store

    Xiaomou and Liu bought two pairs of shoes (a pair of BELLE shoes and a pair of Staccato shoes), and got a receipt on the spot. After shopping, they took two photos of the shop.

    After the purchase, the notaries sealed the goods.

    In accordance with the above process, the notary office has produced (2009) Notarial Certificate No. 150581st.

    In the trial, the box seal was attached to the notarial box, and a pair of women's leather shoes were found in the package. After viewing, the shoes were marked with "BELLE" trademark.


    The court held that, according to the relevant evidence of the trademark registration certificate submitted by the plaintiff, the plaintiff is the trademark owner of the trademark "BELLE" and "trademark BeLLE" of No. 1815147th, and the exclusive right to use the trademark shall be protected according to law in the validity period of the trademark mentioned above, and no organization or individual shall infringe upon it.

    According to article fifty-second (1) and (two) of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China, "the act of using the same or similar trademark on the same commodity or similar commodity without the permission of the trademark registrant" and "selling goods that infringe the exclusive right of the trademark" are infringed on the exclusive right to use registered trademarks.

    The women's shoes sold by the defendant belong to the registered trademark of the plaintiff and the scope of commodities approved for use. At the same time, the marks highlighted in the preceding commodities are the same as the plaintiff's registered trademarks and are not permitted by the plaintiff. Therefore, the commodities mentioned above are commodities that infringe the exclusive rights of registered trademarks.

    The evidence cited by the defendant does not have the power to prove the legal origin of the goods mentioned above, so the act has constituted a trademark infringement. The defendant should bear the corresponding liability in addition to stopping the infringement immediately.

    The court made the decision.


    At present, the verdict has been legally effective.

    • Related reading

    Famous Medicine Magnetic Shoes Deceived Patients Were Exposed

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/9/26 10:47:00
    39

    Us FDRA Helps Putian Shoe Enterprises Deal With EU REACH Regulations

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/9/18 14:11:00
    56

    Putian Shoe Companies Actively Respond To EU REACH Regulations

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/9/17 9:57:00
    41

    Tianjin Has Seized 20450 Pairs Of Fake Brand Leather Shoes And Sports Shoes.

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/9/4 10:48:00
    60

    廈門查獲售假匡威運動鞋窩點

    policies and regulations
    |
    2010/8/31 15:13:00
    32
    Read the next article

    Novice Costumes: Big Cities, Goods, Quality And Cheap Are Mistaken Ideas.

    Good goods are not necessarily concentrated in the popular wholesale market. This view is mainly for bulk stores and retail shopkeepers, that is, the quality of goods is better and the price is not high. Take Guangzhou for example, Guangzhou's white horse market is very popular, but the price is not acceptable to the general retail outlets.

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 内射极品少妇XXXXXHD| 欧美无人区码卡二卡3卡4免费| 激情欧美一区二区三区| 日本韩国一区二区| 国产精品无码一区二区在线| 免费看男女下面日出水来| 久久亚洲精品人成综合网| 黄床大片免费30分钟国产精品| 欧美综合社区国产| 天天操天天干视频| 吃奶呻吟打开双腿做受动态图 | 欧美综合人人做人人爱| 天堂√在线中文最新版8| 亚洲综合色丁香婷婷六月图片| 中文字幕日韩精品有码视频| 91网站免费观看| 欧美www网站| 国产限制级在线观看| 免费大学生国产在线观看p| a级黄色毛片视频| 精品乱子伦一区二区三区 | 国产精品亚洲精品爽爽| 亚洲视频在线观看免费| 一级特黄色毛片免费看| 野狼第一精品社区| 成年无码av片在线| 国产一级性生活片| 久久国产精久久精产国| 高潮videossex潮喷另类| 桃子视频在线观看高清免费视频| 国产成人精品一区二区三在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久| a级片在线免费看| 欧美综合区自拍亚洲综合绿色| 国产精品k频道在线看| 久久国产欧美另类久久久| 美女教师一级毛片| 成全高清视频免费观看| 啊轻点灬大ji巴太粗太长h| 中文www新版资源在线| 精品日韩在线视频|