Institutional Consequences

"The factory chopped the mouldy ham into the sausage; the workers walked around the meat and spit everywhere; the poisoned rats were mixed into the meat grinder; the washing water was made into seasoning."

About more than 100 years ago, when President Theodore Roosevelt enjoyed breakfast at the White House, he read such a disgusting description. As a result, Roosevelt jumped up, spit out the remaining food, and threw the half sausages out of the window.

After that, Americans began to realize that

Compared with the system construction and the effective implementation of the system, moral construction is always so weak, because morality is easily lost under the temptation of interest.

The economic development and social progress of a country cannot be based on "the beginning of human nature and the goodness of nature", because the competition between countries is becoming more and more intense, and the competition between enterprises is becoming increasingly fierce. This inevitably leads to the germination of "evil nature of human nature" and to do something contrary to morality for its own interests.

Therefore, general secretary Hu Jintao pointed out at the second plenary session of the Seventeenth Central Commission for Discipline Inspection: "corruption at this stage in China is caused by profound changes in the economic system, profound changes in the social structure, profound adjustment of the interest pattern, and profound changes in ideology. Imperfect system and loopholes in management are a major cause of corruption.

Therefore, we must deepen the reform, strengthen the system construction, and work hard to solve the deep-rooted problems that lead to corruption, so that we can manage the system, manage the affairs and manage the people with the system.

From this important instruction, we can see that we should work hard in the system of "management".

The phenomenon has once been known as the "Chinese debt" of wisdom. Many public universities have become a huge "treasure bowl" through national financial support, social donation, bank loan, project construction funding, tuition sponsorship and external investment. From 2000, banks queued to find universities to lend money, and now they go to universities to collect debts. What does this change mean? Do colleges really spend money on the development of schools, the upgrading of teachers and the upgrading of hardware? Are they really able to have long-term strategic plans for development? Can not they still be debt, can the state continue to give support? If the state and society give weaning to colleges and universities, where is the independent viability of public universities? China's public universities are heavily indebted.

To answer these questions, we must start with the review of our system.

China's higher education raises millions of university students every year, plus the graduates who have not graduated in the past, but there are about 10 million of the graduates who need jobs. However, the data given by the Ministry of education are very "ideal". In the first half of 2009, the employment rate of College students has reached 68%, which has been flat with last year.

As soon as this data came out, it was quickly questioned by numerous people. Especially, many college students broke the news to get the diploma smoothly, and looked for the letter of intent to join forces to forge a job together. Under such beautiful appearances, the employment problem of university students is bound to turn into a serious social problem.

Why is our university becoming "unable to support"? Why do we still have a large number of college students who are unable to meet the needs of society every year? The key lies in that we do not have a system of "accountability mechanism" for colleges and universities. The government, as a higher education institution, can not afford to throw stones at its feet to reflect on whether the employment rate is true or not, and is unlikely to trace the flow and use of all kinds of funds. To some extent, the beautiful data is "achievements". Under the background of "exam oriented education", under the pressure of achievements, many of our college students spend their parents' life savings, and the result of their return is a funeral system that is missing from the system.

Recently, Chinese President Hu Jintao hosted a banquet in the Great Hall of the people to entertain visiting US President Obama. In the menu of the "four dishes and one soup", basically, it was bought by our ordinary people in the vegetable market. It can be said that this is the continuation of the standard of state banquet that the prime minister Zhou Enlai decided on that year.

But as we all know, some of our grassroots township governments, some of the smaller units, even the heavily indebted state-owned enterprises, are still profligate in taxpayers' hard-earned money. A so-called "working dinner" is commonly used for thousands of yuan, and the state stipulates that "four dishes and one soup". We will make a few dishes into a dish, replace the small dish with a large dish, turn the seaweed egg soup into shark fin abalone soup, and replace the ordinary meal with the delicacies.

According to statistics from authoritative organizations, the expenditure of public funds, public expenses and public pportation in China has reached 900 billion a year. It has become a chronic social disease that we have never been able to cure. This is greatly related to the lack of standard of official reception and the imperfection of system design.

There are various red tape documents at various levels, but there is no standard system that can be constrain, enforce and supervise. Some officials even regard the prohibition as a pretext. It can be used to stimulate local consumption of food and drink. Some counties even need to use a truck of Moutai liquor to entertain one year. They think that both employment and tax increase are not acceptable.

But what have these public servants done for the people? Behind the constant occurrence of food safety accidents in recent years, we can imagine that a meal may increase the risk coefficient of some kind of food.

If we can set up a systematic working standard, clearly list the amount of restricted entertainment, the place of consumption, the number of participants and objects per time, the Limited mileage of public travel, the limited use of buses, and the third party certification and detailed accountability and traceability process, so many problems will be solved.

{page_break}

I heard many executives complain that the execution of employees is not good, and the result of employees is always far from the goal.

In fact, according to the survey statistics, more than 40% of the implementation deviation is due to the lack of management system and workflow. Because there is no system and process, the work of employees is "arbitrary".

For example, many enterprises are responsible for purchasing their bosses or their own shareholders, because this position is usually easy to breed corruption and corruption place, in the early stage of business may be able to restrict by emotion and morality, but when the enterprise becomes bigger, a lot of trivial things must be assigned to subordinates to do, this time the system becomes particularly important.

Designing quantifiable work objectives, project completion deadlines, detailed work procedures, evaluation criteria, 360 degrees of internal and external examination system and rewards and punishments mechanism, and so on, can supervise employees' work and performance in an all-round way. For example, purchasing A raw materials from ten thousand units, we must control the unit price below 1.5 yuan, complete the purchase order within two days, and the supplier can provide effective proof, and if the employee can purchase raw materials below the company's set purchase price for 6 consecutive months, what reward can he get?

Only by doing so can enterprise management be strateged.

However, many enterprises have set up a lot of rules and regulations, which seem logical and very standard. But in fact, many rules and regulations are useless. They do not play a practical role in restricting and supervising employees. In the end, they will only make management more and more complicated, and the working efficiency will be lower and lower.

Therefore, no matter what the size of the enterprise, when designing the system, we must follow the principle of "simple but not simple, systematic and not wordy". We should seize two key points: first, "quantify the process"; quantify and quantify every employee's work as far as possible, set the standard of work performance, and measure performance; secondly, "rewards and punishments", that is, what rewards each employee can achieve in his work goals, and he can't get any punishment.

To manage a big country, such as cooking small and fresh, to manage an enterprise or a country must have a clear idea of what the object of management is.

"Small fresh" to achieve color, aroma and taste, in addition to grasp the precise heat, we must also understand the "Xiao Xian" its own characteristics and ingredients mix, from the market to choose raw materials, to wash, cut, pickle, boil have great knowledge and skills.

Similarly, an enterprise and a country can only avoid the man-made disasters caused by moral degradation by analyzing the characteristics of employees and people and establishing a systematic process and system.