The Restructuring Of Scientific Research Institutes Has Changed To &Nbsp; &Nbsp; It Is Difficult For Central Enterprises To Integrate Their Targets Within A Year.

Joining the industry group will no longer be

This newspaper was informed that Wang Yong, the newly appointed SASAC director, was in the central business.

This also means that the planned central enterprises will not be able to achieve the goal of integrating them into 100 years.

The fate of scientific research institutes

"The latest idea of the SASAC is that the future restructuring direction of the central enterprises such as the China Hydropower Engineering Consulting Group and the CELESTIAL-OLD Design Institute will be reorganized into the large industrial group, but the possibility of the central enterprises in the future will be greater."

A person close to the SASAC said.

Prior to the SASAC held in January, the central enterprise restructuring communication meeting has asked that the above technology central enterprises must submit their respective reorganization plans in the first half of the year.

It is reported that when choosing to enter a large industrial group almost become their "unified action".

However, all this is changing with the appointment of Wang Yong, the new director of the SASAC.

At present, among the 122 central enterprises supervised by the SASAC, the number of science and technology central enterprises is around 10. According to the people familiar with the matter, the restructuring direction of the three design central enterprises in the 10 central enterprises, the China water and electricity engineering consulting group, the China Architectural Design Institute and the China Electric Power Engineering Consulting Group Company, have been decided to enter the China Water Conservancy and hydropower construction group company, the China Construction Engineering Corporation and the three industrial group of the Gezhouba Dam group, and the related restructuring work is progressing.

For the central enterprises of the remaining research category, apart from the Beijing Nonferrous Metals Research Institute, which has now found the "family", most of the remaining research institutes are more likely to exist alone or to integrate horizontally.

Previously, the SASAC has two main reorganization paths for the scientific research institutes, one is the industry with a high degree of concentration. The SASAC's attitude is to encourage the pformation of research institutes into large enterprise groups, and the other one is the industry with a relatively concentrated concentration. The SASAC has previously considered their attitude to be temporarily reserved, or considering the horizontal reorganization of the technology enterprises in the same industry.

Although the latter mode is more popular with the enterprises themselves, it has not become the mainstream of the reorganization path of the scientific and technological central enterprises.

In the past few years, the restructuring of research institutes has been dominated by "big" eating "small". For example, China Building Materials Academy entered China Building Materials Group, Shenyang Chemical Research Institute and entered Sinochem Group.

"One of the difficulties in the integration of central enterprises is the arrangement of the leading bodies, the horizontal merger of the two scientific research institutes, and the arrangement of the leading bodies is even more difficult," said Zhu Po Shan, general manager of tianqiang management consultant.

At the same time, he said, at the present stage, studying the independent existence of central enterprises is a good thing for enterprises themselves.

On the one hand, because most of the remaining research institutes are less concentrated in industry concentration, they need to undertake the role of common industry research; secondly, there are some scientific research institutes, such as the Wuhan post and Telecommunications Scientific Research Institute, which themselves have developed relatively well, and their industrialization has done relatively well. If they are reorganized to a certain central enterprise, they will become the R & D center of the enterprise, but on the contrary, they will be disadvantageous to the long-term development of the enterprise.

{page_break}

100 families are hard to come by

The change of the way of reorganizing the scientific research institutes or the progress of the reorganization of the central enterprises will be delayed, and the target of 100 will not be completed within the year.

Prior to that, the SASAC took 2010 as a time point, and promised that by the end of 2010, the number of central enterprises will be reduced from 196 at the beginning of the year to 80-100.

According to the current situation of the 122 central enterprises supervised by the SASAC, it means that 22 central enterprises will be integrated in the future, and most of them are small technology oriented central enterprises.

From 2008, the SASAC announced the operation of the central enterprises in the separate operation of the central enterprises. It can be seen that the proportion of assets and total profits of the scientific research institutes is only about 1% of the total size of the central enterprises supervised by the SASAC.

"If it is simply for the reduction of quantity, the regrouping will surely fall on the smaller research institutes, which is why the scientific research institutes are anxious to find their own homes for themselves.

The above-mentioned SASAC insider said.

However, it is understood that the number of 100 will no longer be one of the key words of the restructuring of the central enterprises in the future. It is reported that when Wang Yong came to power, he pointed out that the direction and objectives of the restructuring of the central enterprises will remain unchanged, but the specific progress should be subordinated to the needs of the quality and effectiveness of the work.

The SASAC insiders interpreted this as "the goal of the 100 families at the end of the year will no longer be a rigid target, and the number is no longer a key indicator. Effective and sound recommendation is the key."