3Q Dispute Is A Compulsory Course For Netizens.

In China War of business In the past, it may not have been like Tencent today. QQ Qihoo Three hundred and sixty So much attention. Up to 60 years old old lady, down to grade three in primary school, hundreds of millions of people across the country were directly affected by the commercial war. No matter who is right or who is wrong, since it is a commercial war, it is ultimately a dispute of interest. So I think every side of the war is worth understanding. For Tencent, is it wrong for shareholders to be responsible for the development of the company, responsible for their employees, and temporarily sacrifice a little market? For 360, it has provided such a long service for free, and wants to accumulate its own customer resources, so as to make some progress for the future development of the company. For regulators, such a large-scale event is unprecedented. The legislation on the Internet is a big problem in the world. There is no rules for competition. The regulatory authorities have responsibilities, but they are also helpless. It is worth understanding. Therefore, through the above three levels of explanation, back to our "very hurt" netizens, I do not think there is any reason to complain about QQ or 360, the products and services provided by others, you are willing to use them, and you do not want to use them, otherwise you can say that.

So, for the dispute between QQ and 360, I can not judge who is right or who is wrong. And the observation of everyone on the Internet is also different from each other. So, QQ still needs to be used, and 360 I will continue to use it. I believe they will not be the result of you and me, and will eventually lead to harmony. Their quarrels brought me unhappiness for a short time. However, I think this dispute is a lesson for our consumers. We can judge for ourselves before we meet the unqualified products, and then we will make 12315 complaints immediately. Generally speaking, the problem is solved. And when we consume Internet products, even if we fight 12315, I think the problem can not be solved so quickly, because the quality evaluation of the product itself is difficult. We are not experts in Internet. We can not be an expert in Internet products consumption. Therefore, it is better to share with you the "right and wrong" that I have discussed with you. 3Q dispute "Learned." Internet product consumption experience In the Internet era, we need more ideological changes in consumer products.

　 It looks like mine is actually not.

On weekdays, everyone says my QQ, my mailbox, my game account number and so on. Although they all carry one of mine, we can not enjoy absolute ownership of them as other products do. After all, they are just a product, or a service, and this product and service are constantly changing. As an ordinary consumer, we have no way to decide the change of this product. There is no way to decide whether it can provide the corresponding services in the future. Because the product is not well managed, as a service provider, they can also choose to give up, and at that time, we had to give up the product.

Therefore, we must have an objective and accurate understanding of the right of ownership of products when we consume Internet products, especially products with social attributes. We are just using or consuming a product of an enterprise, just borrowing a tool, or leasing a site. We do not own this tool and the site. It may or may have the right to disappear because of a certain situation, or is not completely changed according to our wishes. Therefore, we need to have a substitute for this tool to backup our friends who are close to us and not hang them on a tree. The Internet is just a choice for us, not the only choice. We have friends instead of QQ or MSN. As long as we make more preparations, we will not choose to compromise because we are afraid of losing friends. We will not be angry because they ignore the users for competition. {page_break}

　 Kidnapping and being tied up are all their own.

Many people say that in the competition between Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360, netizens acted as hostages and cannon fodder of Tencent, or a cover or weapon, to eliminate competitors by netizens. So, by contrast, many of us support Qihoo 360, which is relatively weak in strength, rather than Tencent QQ.

We are even more indignant about the kidnapping of netizens by Tencent. I remember that in November 4th, within two hours after being downloaded, 7 of the 10 people in our department had unloaded QQ and launched a long dusty MSN, using the frequently used Fetion. Not only that, they tried to persuade me not to use QQ to say that others would despise me. However, only two days less than the time, our department QQ group inside is shining. Many people, however, still have a hard choice to continue to use QQ after Tencent made "very difficult decisions". Although there are Fetion, MSN and other attempts to play the role of rescuers, but there is no way to change the fate of our Internet users hostage. Most netizens choose to compromise in front of the powerful QQ.

When we depend too much on someone or something, we are kidnapped. In fact, we can not say that TSE QQ kidnapped us. Because we can't afford to be reluctant to use this tool. Obviously, the tools are selected by ourselves, and these friends are also found by ourselves. We can say that kidnapping and kidnapping are actually our own. In the Internet age, can we still achieve the "transcendent realm" of "things instead of things"? Without Internet, without instant messaging, what is our affection, friendship and cooperation to maintain? Maybe we should start thinking more about ourselves.

　　 Safety has to rely on itself.

The dispute between Teng QQ and Qihoo 360 is whether the information security of customers is protected. There is no doubt that the issue of "information security" locked by disputes is a problem that many of our netizens are beginning to pay attention to. The Internet has developed for 10 years, and is no longer a pure land. Kaixin, Jiayuan, Renren, QQ alumni and other community websites that emphasize real names provide a more secure way of social interaction for their customers, and are also a great threat to personal information of netizens. Although the real name, but in order to enhance the sticky community, but is encouraging the understanding between strangers. Because through the six degree relationship theory, people in the world can know any stranger just by working 6 times. So when we log on to our own community page, we will be visited by countless strangers as well. You know, in the real Internet community, many of us upload the most authentic information, including personal data and photos. Advocating real names and encouraging strangers to become friends is a contradiction in itself. The result of this contradiction is the leakage of real information, which is the concern of information security.

Because of sharing the Internet, we have no way to question the sharing function of the Internet. We also have no way to stop people from searching for human flesh or social networking sites. We have no way to stop others from understanding ourselves, because we often understand other people through such a way. Therefore, it is not enough to rely on service providers to ensure their own information security. While we are spending our Internet products, we need to strengthen the awareness of information protection when we use the Internet platform.

The Internet is a world. Like our real world, the world is full of spies, hidden snipers, and many black eldest. Of course, in their opposites, there are many policemen, many chivalrous people who know how to use the Internet. The dispute between Tencent QQ and Qihoo 360 is only one of many discordant factors. In those days, there was still a different price between China Unicom and mobile Internet. If China Mobile limited the call to Unicom and telecom at that time, I believe that mobile Internet could be unified all over the world. Why not mobile? Because of the supervision of national policies. Therefore, I believe that when a market is bigger, when many people are inseparable from this product, just like Tencent QQ, he is not only a market behavior, but also has to shoulder greater social responsibilities. In the future, perhaps Tencent's service will also rise to a national livelihood project and become the object of policy focus regulation.

At this stage, when the regulatory team has not yet been able to keep pace with the changes in network technology, the number of Internet users is large, but the rules of online games have not yet been established and perfected. On many Internet problems, there is still no law to follow. As an ordinary network citizen, what we can do is to rely on ourselves to deal with it more carefully. Try not to rely too much on the Internet and let the virtual world affect our real life. Perhaps, when our lives, work, family ties are kept at a certain distance from the Internet, they will become safer and more enjoyable.