Coexist With "Royal Family": How Can Professional Managers Be Able To Dance Well?

please

On the other hand, with the development of Western cultural and educational undertakings, especially the rise of M BA education with professional managers as the main training direction, professional managers have been developing rapidly, and they have gradually taken over the management work from more and more business owners and "royal families", playing an increasingly important role in the economic arena.

However, there are many complicated stories between professional managers and owners of enterprises who are "Royal relatives".

How do professional managers and "Royal relatives" define their respective jurisdiction? How do professional managers adhere to their professional ethics? How do they reach "imperial relatives"?

Why are managers plunged into the jungle dilemma?

It can be said that professional managers are invited to enter the enterprise with "halo". They are all entrusted with the expectations and sustenance of dealing with complex problems. But with the "halo" of professional managers, the "Royal relatives" in enterprises will start breaking hands with professional managers.

If the manager wins the battle in the jungle rule, the prospect is bright, but if it fails, the result of waiting can only be "away from home".

Examining the root causes of history and reality, why are there contradictions between professional managers and "Royal relatives" in the organizational structure of private enterprises? What are the factors that restrict managers' ability to display their skills?

One is the influence of traditional culture.

Because of the long term impact of natural economy, people's recognition of family and family is far greater than that of other social organizations. Family ties are the underlying rules of social organization. Parents are the absolute authority that must be obeyed in families. With the influence of other complex factors, the whole Chinese society presents a cultural feature of low trust.

People are more likely to believe in people who are related to their own blood and believe in the family circle, while family members have a natural rejection of professional managers.

Obviously, if an outside professional manager can not integrate into this culture, the family members will regard him as an outsider.

Professional managers feel excluded and lack sense of belonging in the enterprise.

Based on the above understanding, for ordinary people, the professional ethics and professional ethics of professional managers are absolute loyalty of "letting the minister die, and the minister can not die", is the absolute obedience of the servant to his master's kindness.

Disobedience in any sense is regarded as disobedience and betrayal, and is regarded as a treason.

Secondly, a considerable number of private enterprises have different levels of "human system" problem: the relevant management mechanism within the enterprise is not perfect enough, so large as the enterprise's major policy and small to specific daily management, many aspects have not yet fully embarked on the "legal system" track.

Among many family run private enterprises, the "royal family" is superior to professional managers.

Every move of the manager is under their supervision, and a little carelessness leads to "cold arrow and hidden weapon" and "spurring bombardment". There is no stage for normal display ability.

In addition, shareholders often can not fully trust professional managers.

Affinity is the traditional culture of China and even Asia as a whole.

On the one hand, in order to become a big company, shareholders are forced to invite professional managers. On the other hand, shareholders are skeptical about professional managers, or just hand over part of their power, or install undercover supervision of their confidant, or promise not to be treated. In short, there are many man-made obstacles.

In some of the boss's subconscious, tired of playing, tired of it, just looking for a reason to fire it, but I can't help myself.

Under such a layout, how do professional managers perform their fist?

Third, on the macro level, the management mechanism of senior management personnel is not perfect, and the exchange of senior management personnel is more dependent on the spontaneous and limited "free love" of the supply and demand sides.

The necessary industry management mechanisms for the comprehensive assessment of senior management personnel, the definition of professional ethics and the entry and exit constraint mechanism have not yet been established and perfected. On the micro level, there is no effective incentive and restraint mechanism for managers in the enterprises, and the structure is unreasonable in incentives: the emphasis is on material incentives, ignoring the need for self realization of professional managers, and not creating a space for self increment and self realization.

In terms of constraints, the internal constraint mechanism is not perfect. It is often just a few simple contracts and articles of association. There is no effective internal control and financial audit system. Professional managers can easily avoid and have a weak binding force.

{page_break}

99 degree effect: oneself is the last piece of wood.

Without the industrial revolution, there would be no emergence of capital and shareholders. Without capital expansion and social production, there would be no birth of professional managers.

It is precisely because of the equality of legal status between large shareholders and small shareholders, between shareholders and professional managers, but because of the organic matching and integration of capital strength and management team strength, it has created a large company in the forefront of the world's top 500 companies such as general electric, Microsoft, WAL-MART and so on.

Professional managers must have what the original managers do not have in their business. They are generally valued by the top executives in the enterprises and are allowed to be brought in with high salaries.

From the point of view of business owners and those "imperial relatives", professional managers are their "big masters" and "fixed sea god needles". Problems that have plagued for many years can finally help them to solve them. But they may also be the swindlers who claim to be able people, and Jin Yuqi will be left behind.

The relationship between professional managers and bosses and "relatives of the royal family" is of great importance. Don't take too much importance on yourself and do not overlook yourself. If you take a good sense of propriety, you will be able to handle your job handy. The professional manager must regard himself as the last piece of wood. When facing the boss and the "imperial relatives", he must understand a reason: capital is always right.

Some professional managers will help enterprises to achieve great breakthroughs and improvements in the market, technology and management. They will think that they have saved the businesses that are on the verge of collapse.

If this happens, there will be danger: you know, before you came, the enterprise had already existed, and existed for many years. Although the stage was relatively crude, it would not be too simple for you to perform, and your role was actually "99 degree effect".

Under the action of the boss of the enterprise, the relatives of the emperor and the staff, the water has burned to 99 degrees. When you come, you just add a bunch of firewood, and the water will boil down.

Never regard yourself as a "savior": without me, how the business will be...

This is definitely a misunderstanding. The professional manager is the last piece of firewood. Without the water at the front 99 degrees, what role can the last piece of firewood play? The proper position is: the professional manager takes the money of the boss and the "imperial relatives", that is, we should let the money increase and become a "babysitter".

A nanny should have a sense of responsibility and fulfill his duty.

In addition, from the enterprise aspect, the establishment of CEO system can also give professional managers full power to operate.

Under the condition of CEO, the board of directors became a small board, and the right of awarding a major business decision to CEO was awarded to the board of directors. The functions of the board changed into selecting, examining and formulating the salary system of management, represented by CEO, so as to realize the functional division between the chairman and CEO.

Of course, the decision-making power of CEO can not be exercised arbitrarily. Under the CEO system, enterprises often set up strategic decision committees to support and reject CEO's decisions.

In the long run, professional managers will be able to get along with the "royal family" when they are in a state of mind. At the same time, they may also have their own day: you have also become a shareholder. They have the company's equity under the company's equity incentive, and even after the accumulation of resources and contacts to a certain degree, they jump out of the category of professional managers and become entrepreneurs. This may be the pursuit of professional managers after "Phoenix Nirvana".