Experts Talk About Standard 1: Deficiency And Progress

　　 textile industry It is China's national industry and pillar industry. Textile standard Since the early days of the founding of the people's Republic of China, the reform and opening up and the frequent technical barriers and frictions in the import and export trade have also made considerable progress. At the same time, we follow the world. Trade The rules of organization (WTO) actively adopt international standards and speed up the pace of integration with international standards. This has also made the overall level of China's standards greatly improved. So far, great achievements have been made from textile materials, manufactured goods to clothing standards. At present, the textile industry standard has formed a textile standard system which is based on product standards and is matched by basic standards. It includes four categories: terminology symbol standard, test method standard, material standard and product standard. It involves fiber, yarn, filament, fabric, textile products and garments. It basically meets the needs of textile and clothing production and trade from quantity and coverage. At the same time, the number of standards is constantly increasing, and the content is also revised in 3-5 years. Textile standards and international standards have also been well done, and the rate of marking is at the forefront of the domestic market. According to the statistics of relevant state departments, the international standard is about 44% of the domestic standard, while the textile standard is 80%.

Although textile standards have made such progress, there are still the following deficiencies:

First, standards are not formulated in terms of product performance and practical needs. Many of our current standards are formulated in the era of planned economy, which are based on the product standards and test method standards formulated according to the raw materials, varieties and production processes of the products. They meet the requirements of the production enterprises and meet the needs of the planned economy at that time. Even if the standards are revised, they will not be able to go out of the old routine. With the development of China's economy and the increase of foreign trade, customers have put forward higher requirements for products, and also put forward new demands for our standards, requiring the final use of products to formulate assessment indicators. However, China's textile standards fail to meet this demand. In many textile and apparel standards promulgated by the state, consumers are closely related to "GB 5296.4-1998 consumer goods instructions, textiles and clothing", and "GB 18401-2003 national textile products basic safety technical specifications". In addition to these two standards, China's main textile product standards are production oriented, the standard setting is to guide production as the main starting point, the technical requirements are closely related to the production process, the indicators are too thin and dead, especially the standard revision speed is lagging behind the product speed. Some enterprises believe that the standard level is too low, while some enterprises think that the standards are too high, forming different requirements and evaluation of standards.

Second, as the finished products of textile products become the trend, consumers' demand for clothing and home decoration is raised, and the problem of matching quality of raw materials and finished products is becoming increasingly prominent. For example, the color fastness of fabric standards is poor, the size of washing materials is changed greatly, and the practical performance evaluation indicators are not available. To ensure the quality of clothing is related to the rise and fall of the whole industry, and to provide safe clothing for the society, not a single industry of garment production can be done. This requires the unified steps of the upstream and downstream industries and the joint efforts of rectification so as to solve the problem thoroughly. At the same time, the fabric production, clothing production and terminal sales must be strictly checked.

Third, the overall level of textile and clothing standards is not high enough to meet the requirements of the WTO/TBT agreement on safety and environmental protection. So far, according to incomplete statistics, there are only a few criteria, such as "GB 18401-2003 national basic safety technical specification for textile products", "GB/T 18885-2009 eco textile technical requirements" and "limit of toxic and harmful substances in GB/T 22282-2008 textile fiber", which are required for ecological and environmental standards. China's standards can not meet the requirements of people's comfort and aesthetics in the setting of assessment items. There are few considerations on fabric strength, breathability, moisture permeability and appearance after washing. Clothing standards still focus on clothing specification deviation, color difference, sewing quality, appearance defects and other indicators.

Fourth, China's standard consciousness is generally weak, which is the most prominent internal reason. First, the market mechanism of standardization work has not been formed, ignoring the market attribute of standard, mainly because the standard can not bring direct economic benefits, and the interests of standard related subjects have not been reflected. Secondly, lack of support for standards, lack of financial input, shortage of standard professionals, lack of attention to international standardization activities, and lack of understanding of international standard setting and technological development trend. It is difficult to put forward pertinent opinions or suggestions on international standards. Due to the shortage of funds, the cost of international certification is relatively high, which makes the chance of some high quality products obtaining advanced technology certification abroad. Thirdly, there are some misunderstandings about the role of standards. We should attach importance to national standards, despise industry standards, and make policy support and financial support unbalanced. Four, enterprises lack the sense of standardization, and fail to recognize the role of advanced technology standards in enhancing the competitiveness of enterprises. Five, domestic consumers lack the concept of green ecological consumption, and the quality and standard of products are not high enough.