China'S Modern Fashion Design System Lacks Solid Foundation For The World Market.

For a long time, yes.

For the problem reports in the field of fashion design, the professional reports that have been biased towards fashion reviews have been entangled for many years. What is the appropriate extent to the problem? Who will not cause unnecessary trouble in the selection of the main body of the comment? What is the core of the direction and the solution of the problem? Every time such a report will produce such a doubt, the reason for that is the popularity of the whole public opinion environment and the mentality of the information receivers.

We notice that after every large-scale fashion distribution campaign in the domestic fashion field, the related reports in various media, especially in the Internet media, are lacking in objective evaluation of fashion designers' works.

Often focus is gathered on the platform of activities, scale, venue, decoration, form of activity, lighting, sound effects, VIP, leaders, stars, models, as well as on the network to attract a large number of hits, such as wrestling, wrestling and other errors, and as the main body of fashion Publishing - clothing works, few people really pay attention to comment.

A large number of reports about fashion works can be seen directly from the designer's mouth or lightly, but no matter which kind is almost praised and criticized less.

Contrary, some individuals can see the truth in public opinion.

The reason for this group of reports is not the lack of criticism in the existing public opinion, but the lack of real praise.

Over the years, the cognitive habits of commentaries in China have become vulnerable and sensitive to both the designer and the media themselves and readers.

Moreover, the use of extreme attention to achieve certain effects has also become a means.

Based on this, in addition to our correspondent's comment, we have chosen representatives from industry associations, institutions, overseas professional institutions and fashion critics to discuss this.

In such a structure, there is no fashion designer's voice, to some extent, it may cause a certain lack of coverage, and may lack the voice of a group.

But there will also be another effect, because the lack of voice in this group makes the group concerned with a calm mind.

Perhaps, as a professional media, there is a deep feeling about the reports of fashion reviews. We have been seeking the development of fashion reviews for many years.

Now, looking back, Yuan Ze, Bao Mingxin, Li Chaode, Zhang Xin Ke, who had been active in fashion criticism ten years ago, have long been silent. The representative of the Mesozoic era Bian Xiangyang did not speak for a long time. Only a group of fashionable fashions dressed by PRADA interpreted the hearts of fashion designers according to their feelings and international information.

Of course, it can not be denied that the present public opinion environment is quite different from that of many years ago. Now designers' mentality is quite different from that of designers many years ago. Now the connotation of fashion reviews is quite different from the fashion reviews that have been circulating for a long time, but the core of fashion reviews has not changed. Through finding, asking questions or sincere praises, we can help designers to guide the trend of business and consumer behavior.

Unfortunately, domestic fashion reviews are missing at present. The criteria for evaluating designers' value are missing, and the judgment of the future direction of Chinese designers is missing.

Behind all the compliments, the hidden trend of the domestic fashion design industry in the direction of design and design is the weakness of concealment in terms of "culture", "environmental protection", "art" and "originality".

Bian Xiangyang, a fashion critic, is asking whether China needs to evaluate the system and standard of designer's value, or whether the current evaluation system and standards are correct and effective. Zhao Qian, who is well versed in the European fashion operation mode, says that public opinion should be more diversified, and it is normal for designers to have different opinions on their works and talents.

Talented designers are not likely to be liked by all people. The evaluation of voices from multiple levels and angles is normal.

We can not deny the designer's talent because of some negative voices. A heated debate will explain the existence of designer's talent.

China's modern fashion design system based on Western fashion industry system lacks the solid foundation for China's broad market and even the world market.

Similarly, in the modern Chinese fashion design system, the public opinion evaluation system for fashion design lacks the foundation of professionalism, market and consumption.

Chinese fashion designers need to make more efforts to find ways to highlight their own design styles and conform to their self-designed development.

Comments on fashion design also need to find a suitable way of survival and development.

As Zhao Qian said, the highest level of a designer is to be composed of high and high, rather than high class.

Fashion reviews are also true.