Global Times: High-Speed Rail Is A Self Torture That China Must Experience.

The severity of the Wenzhou motor car accident is a senior one in the history of world railway, though it can not be said to be the most serious.

The psychological impact brought by it to China's high-speed railway is also high.

China's pportation industry has been in a backward state for a long time. High-speed rail and EMU make China's first traffic to the world's leading position. China lacks such leading experience and is in a social doubt.

There is no accurate explanation for the cause of the rear end collision, but the public's suspicion of "immature technology" and "management confusion" is logical.

The railway sector is facing severe questioning and torture. It must face it bravely and frankly.

This is a responsible attitude towards the public as well as to the railway sector.

The Ministry of Railways promptly lifted the duties of the Secretary of the Shanghai Railway Bureau and the Secretary of the Party committee, which can be seen as a step in the right direction of the Ministry of railways.

Objectively speaking, the whole of Chinese Society

To be precise, the high speed railway is a comprehensive sprint to the world's highest level in the relaxed society of the Chinese railway departments. It requires the railway departments to turn their small environment into a "super developed country level" organization, and also requires the whole Chinese society to treat the railway sector with bold and positive attitude.

The innovation of high-speed rail is a self torture of Chinese society.

All responsible persons of the Wenzhou accident should be severely investigated, but the accident should not be the reason for negating the speed raising movement of Chinese railways.

From the EMUs to the high-speed rail, the rapid progress of the railway has made great contributions to China's economic development and the overall progress of the society. In today's very difficult time for Chinese railways, the Chinese public should be able to make a rational distinction between strict accountability and encouraging progress.

China has come to challenge the world's most advanced level in individual fields.

And any top position is risky. We can see what happened in the early years of ships, trains, planes, and space shuttles.

But China's high-speed rail must never compare itself with the invention of old pportation tools. Today's Chinese society will not allow such a security uncertainty.

China's high-speed rail should not be merely a miracle of speed. It must also be a comprehensive miracle of technological safety and management safety.

The railway departments should treat the criticism of the public in good faith and have great responsibilities in doing big things.

This time in Wenzhou

Chinese society needs to survive the crisis in Wenzhou, and its outcome should be that we are safer.