Seven Bias In Policy Making Management

(1) overconfidence in self judgment.

You only trust your own judgment, but you don't trust others. enterprise A common problem with bosses. For any person, if the power is given to him and the responsibility is added to him, they will make the right judgement. As long as they are not dissidents and competitors are sent to the undercover, no subordinate employee will deliberately make any adverse decisions on the development of the enterprise.

Too much emphasis on the accuracy of one's own judgment negates the need for others to participate in decision-making. In China, a country with emphasis on interpersonal interaction culture, it will only lead to tension between people, reduce the competitiveness of decision-making, and also reduce the organization's execution.

Therefore, enterprises Boss It is also necessary to have a broad mind and respect the value of each subordinate employee.

If you think he is not worthy of respect and not trustworthy, you should drive him away from this enterprise organization. He does not respect or distrust him, but keeps him in the business organization. No one is a fool, you will perceive your true attitude towards him. When the other side perceives your disrespect and distrust, you create a dissident within the corporate organization and force the other person to do the right thing in public or secretly. This is the most tragic thing in the process of enterprise management.

(2) ignoring the collection of decision information.

Decision making is choice, which is an optimal choice. Not having enough information, scheming for simplicity, making decisions in the light of imagination, it saves the cost of decision making, but it often brings huge cost of decision making.

Compared with the cost of decision making, the cost of decision making is negligible, 1/10, one percent. Maybe 1/1000, 1/10000, or even more.

It is true that we must not lose our money.

(3) there is no concept of optimal decision time.

Decision making is to identify opportunities and strive for opportunities. Any opportunity is limited by time. It's time to go. For routine decision-making problems in the process of enterprise organization operation, we must avoid the important and urgent problems which are delayed and become important and urgent problems, and then deal with them. This will inevitably lead to confusion due to busy activities, and the quality of decision-making will be reduced because of chaos.

But many of our business owners do not have the best decision time concept. They are busy all the time, nervous, often busy but not the place, and the best time to make decisions is missed.

In this way, how can we not reduce the quality of decision-making?

(4) belittle the role of decision analysis.

To grasp the opportunities brought about by the actual changes of the external environment on the basis of grasping the internal and external reality of enterprises, the most fundamental point is to establish a stable and real link between the goal sought by the enterprise development and this reality. This is to choose appropriate decision analysis methods to identify opportunities and explore opportunities.

Tossing a coin to make a decision is also a decision-making method, but it can not establish any stable and real link between the objective sought by the enterprise development and the internal organization of the enterprise and the actual external environment.

If there is no scientific decision analysis method, the decision will be taken for granted. This decision will be strange if the quality is high! {page_break}

(5) lack of a complete decision-making system.

In front of the analysis, enterprise organization operation process is a circle of beads. Every decision is a Buddha bead. Only by linking different decisions can we accurately grasp the relationship between different decisions. This is not only the need to grasp the reality of enterprises, but also the need to improve the quality of decision-making.

If there is not a complete decision-making system, just like the beads scattered on the ground, they will lose contact with each other and make mistakes in decision-making. Without a complete decision-making system, it is difficult for decision makers to find out the relationship between different decisions and the nature of such a relationship. In accordance with different levels of organization, decentralization decisions are made, and mistakes are inevitable.

Under such circumstances, how can a company make high-quality decisions? How can it be competitive?

(6) disregard staff The role of participation in decision-making.

Any employee is a subjective existence, has his own consciousness and will, and also has the desire to satisfy the needs of good.

To exclude employees from participating in the decision-making process is to deprive subordinates of the right to satisfy their desires. In such a case, not only will the consequences of "decision makers lose their minds" will be made, but even the right decisions will be resisted by the subordinates in the process of implementation, so that a good decision can be turned into a low quality decision.

(7) mystifying the decision-making process.

Many companies make decisions, whether necessary or not, mysterious.

This makes the participants of decision get satisfaction of self value. However, those who did not participate in it left a sense of disrespect and distrust. What is more, some enterprises will also engage in some solemn rituals in order to increase the mystery of decision-making.

The quality of decision making is guaranteed by scientific decision analysis method and extensive participation of brainstorming. However, the mystifying of decision-making process only ignores the choice of scientific decision analysis method and excludes the participation of subordinates in decision-making process.