Solving Textile Pollution Calls For Policies And Regulations

According to the national pollution source survey, in the 39 industries, the textile industry ranked the highest in COD emissions, accounting for 18.53% of the country, of which 55% were caused by printing and dyeing desizing sewage, the chief culprit was PVA and other unclean slurry.

From the test results of the desizing waste liquid in the cotton textile industry and printing and dyeing industry without PVA sizing demonstration project, it is known that no

I sampled 46 textile factories above Designated Size and produced 3 billion 200 million M of fabric annually, accounting for 20.5% of the average PVA.

In 2010, the output of cotton cloth reached 81 billion meters. It is estimated that the PVA for textile sizing will reach 170 thousand tons. If the high performance modified starch is equivalent to 170 thousand tons PVA, the total carbon dioxide emission will be reduced by 4 million 30 thousand tons / year.

Over the past more than 10 years, the industry has been unremitting efforts to promote and promote environmental protection sizing technology.

From the gradual pition from PVA to PVA, some textile factories with strong sense of social responsibility have emerged and pioneered the comprehensive implementation of PVA free sizing.

From the "no PV sizing" excellent product declaration, the loom efficiency and the quality of the next machine can be maintained or higher than PVA sizing without PVA sizing, and the sizing cost is obviously reduced.

There are many in China.

However, a small number of pulp enterprises use fake slurry containing PVA and other unclean slurry to counterfeit without PVA slurry, so that the textile mill has gone back without knowing it.

In addition, some textile enterprises encountered the fluctuation of sizing quality. Instead of first analyzing the reasons objectively, they first resumed the use of PVA, while others did not see the direct benefits after the implementation of PVA sizing. Once the slurry price fluctuated, they no longer persisted, which was the result of lack of relevant policy support.

To sum up, it is ripe for the government to ban the use of PVA and other unclean slurry sizing. This will be the biggest support for the first comprehensive implementation of environmental protection sizing enterprises.

The government does not need it.

In view of the great contribution of environmental protection to the social benefits, it is reasonable and necessary for the state to reward the enterprises in advance.

Through the declaration, acceptance and selection, we can select the advanced national environmental protection sizing units and give appropriate incentives for tax relief.

The specific reduction and exemption method can be referred to the way of high and new technology enterprises.

Through the environmental protection tax, limiting the use of unclean slurry such as PVA, it will mobilize the enthusiasm of weaving mills to promote environmental protection and change pressure into power, and many problems will be solved.

It is suggested that the environmental protection tax should be levied on the use of unclean slurry.