Yu Muzhan: The Market Standard Of Radiation Protection Clothing Is Slower.

Recently, CCTV exposing pregnant women to wear radiation protection clothing will increase their clothing. radiation Strength. In this regard, radiation protection clothing operators questioned the authority of CCTV commissioned laboratories. They believed that CCTV's experiment was not rigorous and had loopholes. electromagnetic wave The emission direction basically does not exist in daily life. Moreover, if radiation protection clothing does not work against radiation or even aggravate radiation, then how can some scientists and technicians wear radiation proof clothing for radiation protection?

According to a survey, more than half of the respondents after the CCTV report gave up the purchase of radiation protection clothing. According to the chief operating officer of the brand "excellent plus" of radiation protection clothing, CCTV reported that the "three months' freeze period of the industry could not be avoided".

No matter what the purpose or purpose of CCTV reports and radiation protection clothing companies is behind the scenes, it is hard to get rid of numerous "quasi mothers", and countless pregnant women are at a loss. So some people called for the introduction of an authoritative national standard for radiation protection clothing.

However, this standard is not good. First, what standard is it? Is it an industry standard for radiation protection clothing manufacturers, or a radiation protection standard for maternal and child health care, or is it a technical standard for electromagnetic radiation? Secondly, is the standard setting determined according to the static standard experiment done by the lab commissioned by CCTV, or is it determined according to the actual life of the manufacturer?

Although modern science can grasp the precise radiation detection technology, and understand the maximum radiation dose that the human body, especially pregnant women can accept, it is not a simple matter to formulate a standard of radiation protection clothing. It is not necessary to determine the time required to determine these criteria, that is, how to refer to the parameters listed above, and how much we need to confirm, but we still do not understand. parameter I am afraid it is difficult to ascertain.

If we rush to set the standard of authority, it is not only not necessarily scientific, but also more likely to be driven by interests.

The emergence of a new commodity is not authoritative at the very beginning, and the standard is gradually formed with the expansion of the market. It is normal and inevitable for manufacturers to participate more. The problem is that too many advertisements often cover up other voices, especially some scientific voices. This is not conducive to the formation and formulation of scientific standards for new commodities. In the final analysis, it is also not conducive to the perfection of new commodities. Expand It is not conducive to the operators of new commodities.

This time, the conclusion that CCTV reports on wearing radiation protection clothing for pregnant women will increase the radiation intensity of clothing is comprehensive. It is not known yet, but at least, there are a lot of different voices in the advertising of radiant clothing, so that consumers can distinguish them. Of course, for most consumers, they need a simple and clear answer. I believe that in time, the authority of radiation protection clothing will come from various scientific perspectives.