During The Period Of 3 / 15, Many Brands Of Fur Leather Products Fell Into "Quality Gate".

315 approaching, consumer rights protection involves all walks of life, such as people's increasingly related food, furniture supplies, enterprise related equipment and new industries such as online shopping.

Especially in recent years, the phenomenon of brand fashion fraud has been reported frequently.

315 at present, we will take stock of the recent issue of brand fur manufacturing.

Women's wear in 23 districts

The 23 area is a Japanese brand, and the production company Nwad (ONWARD) was founded in 1927. The 23 District Women's clothing is only one of its famous fashion brands.

After nearly a century of development, the company has become the largest clothing company representing Japan. Its company has many well-known brands such as ICB, 23 districts, Rosebullet, 23 District Homme, suite, suite children's wear, and has opened stores in various large and medium-sized cities of China.

In September 2011, consumers said that the Japanese famous brand 23 zone women's clothing was purchased in Nanjing Dongfang shopping mall. The product specification was CMVAIA6281 fur clothing, and was tested unqualified by the national fur quality supervision and testing center.

It is labeled as sheep skin material, but the long fur of solid collar and sleeve is non woolen skin.

With September 25, another consumer called the Wangfujing department store in Beijing to spend 15200 yuan on the 23 District of the Japanese brand women's clothing, CMVAIA6280, as an unqualified product.

And provided

Manfield

In the early November 2012, consumers bought the Mass Phil brand women's clothing at a price of more than ten thousand yuan at the Zibo commercial building in Shandong. The fur of the product marked by the fur liner was made of rabbit fur, and the material quality was shoddy.

As a loyal consumer of Mass Phil, the buyer expressed disappointment.

But for the media tracking reports, many months have passed, rights protection has not yet been resolved, and seemingly Shenzhen Mass Phil company has no response.

For this situation, Ji Wanchang, a rights activist, said that the Mass Phil company had committed no change. It was a contempt for consumers and a more serious plot. In view of this attitude, it will help consumers to safeguard their rights.

Kang Jinyong (KANGJINYONG)

Kang Jinyong, who once participated in the international fashion show for 10 years (KANGJINYONG), was also unsatisfactory by many famous actress at home and abroad. In 2011, Miss Hua and Miss Liu bought the Korean women's brand Kang Jinyong (kangjinyong) vest and fur coat respectively in December 2011, 15 and December 11th in Chengdu in December 2011 and 3 times in Chongqing.

The vest is marked with 100% mink fur. After the inspection of the national leather products quality supervision and inspection center, the actual material is fox fur. The fur coat is marked with 100% fox fur and 100% mink fur. After the inspection by the national fur quality supervision and inspection center, the actual result is that there are a large number of leather clips in the fabric, not 100% fox fur, and the color matching material is not marten fur.

LAN Zi

In November 20, 2011, a consumer bought a $15120 yuan dress in Tianjin friendship shop. The cotton dress was labeled as squirrel fur, and was guaranteed by the salesperson. However, the quality inspection of the two national brand inspection center of the national fur quality supervision and inspection center and the national leather products quality supervision and inspection center were all non squirrel skins.

Therefore, consumers have entrusted the professional counterfeiting man to the right to deal with the quality dispute of this product. In the negotiations between Ji Wanchang and LAN Zi fashion company, they prevaricate and prevaricate and deny that their products are all right.

I would like to see that in Ji Wanchang's face, we should give the so-called problem free products a refund.

It is reported that after the strong request of Ji Wanchang, Langer dress dress Co., Ltd. agreed to recheck together, and the two sides have formulated relevant oral agreements. If the re inspection results are qualified, consumers will not return the goods. If the inspection results are the same as those of the previous two times, Ji wan chang has the right to supervise the brand of the brand and the shopping malls sold, and report to the relevant departments of the state to punish the action and prosecute the court to help consumers to make a statement.

In February 2012, Ji Wanchang and long Zi Fashion Co., Ltd. jointly entrusted the Beijing national leather products quality supervision and inspection center to carry out re inspection, and asked the inspection center to form an expert group to conduct destructive expert identification on the products of the group.

Beijing leather products quality supervision and inspection center should invite experts from Zhangjiakou national leather quality inspection center, experts from Hohhot national fur inspection center and experts from the national footwear and leather products quality inspection center.

Finally, the expert group's opinion is that the number of lady's dress is C114PR12649 (45).

Not long ago, another consumer broke the news. In November 18, 2011, two pieces of Beijing's Wangfujing department store bought ten thousand yuan worth of cotton dress, which was also found to be a substandard product.

LV, Armani

In 2009, Zhejiang industrial and commercial law enforcement officers extracted three back bags which were being sold by LV Hangzhou store. The inspection reports showed that the three pieces of leather bags in the back of the bags were not identified as "identities", so they were unqualified products.

Coincidentally, the Shanghai industry and Commerce Bureau in the LIU.JO brand clothing store, the inspectors found that most of the clothes are only English logo, sales staff argue that this is to highlight its international brand effect.

And the logo of Armani clothing is also unclear. For example, a Armani underwear label is only vaguely marked with two words of the fiber, and consumers do not know whether the "fiber" refers to cotton, wool, silk or chemical fiber.

In addition, the inconsistencies in the Chinese and English composition of clothing labels have also become an important reason for the quality of Armani's checks.

It is understood that international brands of clothing almost every year will be "unqualified" news.

In February 2005, Shanghai entry-exit inspection and Quarantine Bureau extracted 31 batches of imported international famous brand garments, of which 20 batches of products were not qualified.

By the end of 2006, the Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of industry and Commerce conducted a sampling survey, which showed that 46 batches of imported shoes had been rejected, and 35 batches of them were unqualified, including more than 10 top brands of Louis Weedon, Valentino and D&G.

Last year, the Guangzhou industry and Commerce Bureau randomly sampled 17 casual clothes, including Adidas, NIKE, ESPRIT, ONLY, SNOOPY and THEME, which were sold by 100 shopping malls and supermarkets in Guangzhou. There were 100 batches of Chinese and foreign brands. After testing, the qualified rate was only 46%, and 15 batches containing carcinogenic aromatic amines exceeded the standard.

I do not know who spoiled the foreign brands, and have no fear of counterfeiting.

Looking back at fur and leather products, quality gate events are everywhere, so we can not help but, after the problem arises, enterprises are arrogant and indifferent to deal with, regardless of consumers' rights protection.

Ding Ning, executive vice president of the Guangdong apparel and apparel industry association, said that the current domestic brand clothing supervision is generally defective, coupled with China's lower market threshold, so that a large number of so-called international brand enterprises have been driven directly into the country. Many imported garments have not been tested directly from abroad to the shopping malls, and the problem has been taken away from the cabinet.

In the future, we must intensify our efforts to crack down on such a phenomenon.