If The Industry Confronting, China And The US Are Losers.

The fourth round of Sino US strategic and economic dialogue

In May 3rd, Beijing, with its increasing intensity, welcomed the fourth round.

At the opening ceremony, Chinese President Hu Jintao attended the opening ceremony and delivered a speech.

The special representative of President Hu Jintao, Vice Premier Wang Qishan and State Councilor Dai Bingguo co chaired the round dialogue with the special representative of the US President Obama, Hilllary Clinton and Minister of finance Timothy Geithner, and the heads of the more than 20 departments of both sides participated.

The four special representatives of the two heads of state may be the last to join the dialogue in such a capacity, so the two sides have special expectations for this round of dialogue.

The strategic and economic dialogue between China and the United States has begun in Beijing. The mechanism of the Sino US strategic and economic dialogue has been seen as a very important platform for the emerging powers and the big powers to explore ways of cooperation and collusion and cooperation.

Among them, expanding trade and investment opportunities is a key topic for discussion between the two sides. How to create complementary cooperation between China and the United States? How can we resolve economic and trade differences and reach more common understanding at the two day meeting? How can we achieve more consensus? The opening of the fourth round of China US strategic and economic dialogue, where are our cooperation and differences? What are the new implications of the Sino US strategic and economic dialogue?

In the Sino US strategic and economic dialogue, the two sides discussed the theme of deepening strategic communication and pragmatic cooperation and promoting sustained and mutually beneficial Sino US economic relations to promote strong, sustainable and balanced growth, expand trade and investment opportunities, and stabilize and reform financial markets.

The United States has been adopting an unequal strategy in the dialogue, for example, China has been talking about the export of high-tech products for many years, every time it will mention, and pulled out the list, the United States has also said it can be considered, but the final consideration is that only a very small part of the very marginalized so-called high-tech products, promised to talk, but other aspects will be very strict, and do not give in.

The biggest confrontation is that one is a big country and the other is a big emerging country.

Under the current situation, the two big powers have shown a trend of even growth. That is, the growth of the US is now struggling to recover. Although the economy has some positive news, people feel that the uncertainty is very large.

Even though the Chinese economy may slow down this year, it is estimated that the GDP growth in China will still remain above 8% this year, which will bring about a problem.

For the United States, they are more concerned about the fact that the United States is leading globalisation. Its aim is to get the biggest dividend from globalization. But in fact, the result of the US assessment is that China has become the biggest beneficiary of globalization. This makes the United States not only uncomfortable, but also finds many reasons to bargain with China.

With regard to the problem of high technology, in the past 10 years, we have found that the export of high-tech parts, the more China demands, the less the US exports to China, and the middle of the US's export doubling plan, that is, in high-tech products, the civilian part is actually taking a relaxation policy, but it is an exception to China.

The double use of the United States is against the law.

In the past two years, the US trade friction has shifted to the establishment of new trade rules and order in the world. When China joined the WTO, there was a protocol with a clause called 15. It stipulates that no matter whether China's marketization is high or low, China can not enjoy full market economy status until 2016. Any WTO member can carry out anti-dumping against this clause.

In addition, China is not fully market economy status, you can not countervailing China, because the basis of countervailing is to determine that you are a complete market economy status, so that you can determine the extent of your subsidy.

However, since 2006, the United States means that he should not only impose anti-dumping duties against China on the basis of the 15 Clause, but also consider that you are a full market economy.

For example, the current double reverse survey of tire and wheel hub are closely related to the automobile industry.

such as

There will be no double opposition, only the idea of restricting you, because the United States has completely given up, so it is in some of the intersecting industries.

But look at the clothing industry, and know that even if the US has stopped doing this industry, there must be some way to restrict you.

As for the clothing industry, because the United States is pushing the TPP (p Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement) now, there is a rule in the middle of TPP. If the TPP part can form an agreement, in the future, like the clothing industry, from its spinning, weaving to clothing, it must be completed within TPP.

At the time of the Boao forum, the former US Commerce Minister, Mr. Gutierrez, did not agree with this policy. His view is, is it necessary for the us to re-establish and develop the textile industry in the future?

The industrial structure between China and the United States should be said to be a complementary structure, so there is no competition relationship between complementary structures, so there should be no conflict.

Trade frictions between China and the United States have not started yet, but as China's industrial structure continues to pform and upgrade, more and more industries will form competitive relations with American industries. By that time, trade frictions will really start.

In addition, if the industry is confronting, China and the US are losers. How can the two industries complement each other?

This confrontation and competition between China and the United States is inevitable, but we hope it is benign. We also hope that this confrontation will be in a reasonable scope for China, for the United States and for the whole world.