Yang Da Jun Discusses China'S Clothing Brand Construction And International Gap

There is a big gap between the brand building and the international market. Now China is the first generation to do the big clothing, so it is normal for a brand to go through several generations.

Yang pointed out that many enterprises in Fujian, for example, are selling clothes, not making brands, because selling clothes only needs advertising and spokesmen, the construction of channels, and selling products to consumers at the fastest speed, OK is OK.

The brand is a representative of life style, a symbol of ideology and a manifestation of values.

But in China, we have no way to use social class to measure which brand represents the lifestyle of any group of people. The brand of Fujian can not represent any way of life.

At the same time, Yang Dayun said that compared with the international market, China's clothing industry is still a preliminary stage of growth. It is not mature. From the reform and opening up to the present 20 years, China's clothing industry has begun to pay attention to brand building and pay attention to the real needs of consumers from the extensive development.

For many garment enterprises have chosen to list, in the clothing industry, listing is not the best choice of development path.

"In other industries, people may have told you that financing the market is more conducive to brand development, but not necessarily in the clothing industry, such as Armani. It is a very good company but it refuses to go public, and it also does very well.

We also see that LV is a good thing to help many brands grow quickly through listing and financing.

He believes that listing is not a final conclusion for an enterprise, but it needs to be listed on a large scale because of its high homogeneity and large scale operation, because it needs capital, such as sporting goods. It is a highly homogenous industry.

What is the development stage of China's clothing industry compared with that of the international market? How big is the difference? The problem is very large. Compared with the international market, China's clothing industry is still a preliminary stage of growth. It is not mature. From the reform and opening up to the present more than 20 years, China's clothing industry has been developing from extensive development to the construction of brand and paying attention to the real demand of consumers.

The brand of the United States just now said that Anna Sui was the last one, but the fact is not exactly the same. All the brands in the United States, such as POLO, CK, including Anna Sui, were born in 70s, and all the brands were born between 1965 and 1978. The birth of the US brand also has its historical reason, because the United States after the Second World War, the second population peak period, these people from the United States after World War II rebellion, sexual liberation and so on, until the second generation began to rational regression, after the US economy has 80 years of rapid growth, these people as the brand of soil, they carried the famous brand growth of the United States, this is a specific historical condition and specific economic environment born. The most difficult point to break through is that there is a very big gap between Chinese brands, brands and consumers, and consumers' acceptance of brands, which is very different from that of western countries.

Let's turn around and say that brands like Italy, like Versace, have a hundred years of brand names. Now the brand in Italy's real fashion is Armani and tinned Kaba. These famous designers are all alive now. The birth of these brands was also born in Italy from 60s to 70s after World War II.

Let's look at France, France and Europe. The brands will be even more distant. They also have the first generation and the second generation. Their first generation, like Chanel and DIOR, has been stable in the global brand position, but their status can not be compared with Chanel and DIOR.

我們再看日本，像高田賢三等，這些設計師是在60年代誕生的，中國的服裝企業要崛起，他們一定需要一個著落點，這個著落點是80年代和90年代，就跟QQ和騰訊的網民一樣，因為這代人他們對時尚和對流行和對新生活，新鮮刺激的追求會給我們的品牌提供一個成長的空間，因為每代人代表著一個文化的時代，而服裝是文化和時代的特別的表現，比如你看黃軍裝，一看就是那個時代的，你再倒退兩年穿雅閣里，我們會覺得你又是領域一個樣子，不管怎么樣，服裝是一個時代歷史的痕跡，而且它是消費者所追求的，我認為中國的服裝企業未來的誕生是80年代到90年代，但是80年代到90年代，這個時間中國是用多長時間才能產生像SARA，HM這樣的產品，這樣的機會會來臨，在未來的5-10年，中國的服裝品牌會因為消費者的支撐，經濟環境的改善市場需求的增加，我覺得這些品牌

The future will come.

Pay great attention to brand building. Do they really make sense for brand building? In fact, many enterprises in China are selling clothes, not making brands, because selling clothes only needs advertising and spokesperson, the construction of channels, and selling products to consumers at the fastest speed. But what is the brand? Brand is a symbol of life style, a symbol of ideology, and a manifestation of values. For example, we see that POLO in the US is sold to wealthy families. After 50 years of retirement, life becomes rich and leisurely, and we see that he is all sports and leisure, which satisfies the needs of this person. Many clothing enterprises in China are aware of brand problems.

But in China, we have no way to use social class to measure which brand represents the lifestyle of any group of people. The brand of Fujian can not represent any way of life.