LV Was Boycotted By Chinese Consumers To Protect The Olympic Flame.

One of the main reasons why a network power protested against French cargo LV, which had sponsored Darai to arouse the boycott, was that the Olympic torch was not passed smoothly in Paris, and the local media reported that Chinese netizens felt "unfriendly in France".

As Louis Vuitton Mott Hennessy group (hereinafter referred to as LVMH group) was suspected to have been "Tibetan independence" financial support, netizens launched a boycott.

The boycott list includes LVMH, LV, Dior, Fendi, Guerlain, Clinique, Kenzo, silk flower cosmetics store, Hennessy and other wines, champagne and Cognac brands.

Some netizens believe that on the one hand, the LVMH Group donated a lot of money to Darai. On the other hand, the French people in the streets saw the support of the "Tibetan independence" elements in the Paris torch relay process. "There is really no reason to send the money to the French again to buy their goods."

The patriotic boycott behind the trend of the wave of French goods quickly ignited another wave of enthusiasm among netizens.

"Let them look at the power of Chinese and Chinese Internet", a netizen excitedly replied.

Some netizens said, "as long as we unite, there is nothing we can't overcome".

Many netizens also boycotted "boycott legal products".

Yesterday, Mr. Tan, who worked in Guangzhou, also received a boycott message from his former classmates. But he refused to respond to the call of his classmates and explained to his classmates. "Maybe I can't convince them, but at least let them know that some people do not think the same as them."

Some netizens believe that this boycott is simply a farce and ridicule, "smashing French cars, German cars, British cars, and riding Southern China tigers after going out. After all, it's made in China." LV: posting is just an ordinary consumer public relations officer. LV is just a brand of LVMH group, and critics of netizens should contact France headquarters.

But the public relations staff said that the reaction of netizens will not affect the sales of LV products. After all, the product positioning is the high-end people, while posted on the network claiming that the boycott is just an ordinary consumer.

Law and capital enterprises: the boycott of legal products will be lost. Although netizens' posts and calls are limited to Internet and SMS, they have attracted a lot of attention from law firms.

Yesterday, a law and capital enterprise staff told our reporter that the company is paying close attention to the relevant trend, which is not good for the company's business prospects.

She told reporters that this national sentiment is easy for domestic people to vent their dissatisfaction on French businesses and products.

She believes that boycotting French companies and products is easier than American companies and products, after all, the number of French companies in China is still relatively small.

She believes that the French supermarket only Carrefour, and French products for the public is more "taste", the market is not big, very easy to be excluded.

But she said that we should reflect in a rational and rational way. In fact, simply taking the measures of boycott is actually two wars, and it is harmful to innocent enterprises and even to Sino French relations.

Chinese consumers have begun calling for a boycott of French goods on the Internet in response to fierce Anti China protests during the Olympic torch relay in Paris this week.

Boycotted the companies that were named in the call, including the luxury brands of LVMH group, such as Louis Weedon Vuitton and Givenchy, and L'OREAL, a cosmetics group with large business in China (L "Oreal"), Louis.