• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Who Is The Big Stick Of Adidas?

    2008/4/16 0:00:00 10474

    Three Bars

    The design of the two, three and four stripes is a violation of the "three bars" trademark. Adidas uses this sword to the global competitor, the International Herald reporter, the male Adidas from Berlin, Germany. Adidas's three white stripes are trademarks of its sporting goods and sportswear. However, many fashion designers also like to use stripes, so over the years, transnational legal disputes continue. In April 10th, the European Court of justice made a ruling in favor of Adidas, which marked the global dominance of Adidas's "three bars", extending to the "two bars", "four bars" and even all stripes. In a ten year case, the European Court ruled that although Adidas trademark is three stripes, it can legally eliminate any competitor's use of two stripes. The court explained that the number of stripes is not important, but it is important whether buyers will link it to Adidas trademark. In the wake of the ruling, Adidas overcame C&A, H&M, Marca Mode and Vendex's four major international apparel brands. For this paper ruling, Adidas has been fighting for ten years. At the end of the 90s of the last century, Adidas sued the local court in Holland, saying that the two stripes used by the four big brands infringed their trademark rights. The Holland court held a long pending decision on the "difficult case" until it was submitted to the European Court of justice last year. Now, after the ruling of the European Court of justice, the case will return to the Holland court again, and ultimately the latter will determine the amount of compensation and so on. In fact, this is not the most brilliant battle of Adidas's "three bars". In the past 60 years since the establishment of Adidas in 1949, this kind of legal battle has never stopped. As early as 1970s, the German court had decided that any two, three or four stripes were designed to infringe Adidas's "three bars" trademark, which has become a permanent decision in Germany. With this case, Adidas defeated its old rival, Nike. In 2005, a pair of parallel stripes was stitched on the shorts of Nike's listed shorts. In January of next year, the local court of Cologne, Germany, supported Adidas's complaint and ordered Nike to stop selling such infringing garments and fined 1 million euros. In the same period, Tom Tailor, a German garment manufacturer, was fined 500 thousand euros for the design of the "two bars" of a jacket cuff. Outside Germany, Adidas's "striped escort war" is constantly on the way. In 2003, Adidas filed a lawsuit against Fitness Universal Trading Corporation in Luxemburg. In 2005, Adidas continued to accuse designer Ralph Lauren and Abercrombie and Fitch company to the US court. He thought that two striped patterns of clothing and sneakers were also infringing on their "three bars" trademarks. In 2006, Adidas filed a lawsuit against the Fujian Philharmonic clothing and footwear company in China. But the design of the "five bars" is an exception now. Since 1966, the Swiss K-SWISS footwear company has been using this uncontroversial five stripes. The "tigers" dominate the world after the ruling of the EU court this month, which means that if the two or three or four stripes are designed for clothing and sports shoes within the EU, it is likely to infringe Adidas's trademark rights. Some independent designers have begun to express their dissatisfaction. Ursula Hudson, a famous designer in London, believes that the design elements of the stripes should not be the private property of a company. "The most dangerous result of this decision is that it will limit the designer's creative inspiration and attack the whole design industry." In Europe, the media dissatisfied more than Hudson alone. Adidas's "three bars" logo enjoys a worldwide brand reputation of at least 90%. With this brand, its annual sales volume has exceeded 10 billion US dollars, and its annual net profit has reached hundreds of millions of dollars. Adidas magazine commented that Adidas, like a tiger protecting its cubs, fiercely protects its classical stripes, which will expand to the European Union, the United States and the whole world.
    • Related reading

    The Torch Was Disrupting In Paris. Chinese Netizens Called For The Boycott Of French Goods.

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10450

    Gucci Suffered "Li Gui" Compensation

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10463

    LV Was Boycotted By Chinese Consumers To Protect The Olympic Flame.

    Global Perspective
    LV
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10428

    Adidas'S "Olympic Experience"

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/14 0:00:00
    10443

    Adidas'S "Three Bars" Hegemony

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/14 0:00:00
    10532
    Read the next article

    "GUCCI" Sued "San Da" To Win A Lawsuit

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 爱情岛论坛在线视频| 成人免费黄网站| 日韩加勒比在线| 大炕上农村岳的乱| 国产zzjjzzjj视频全免费| 亚洲jjzzjjzz在线观看| 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码aⅴ| 37大但人文艺术a级| 男操女视频免费| 成人精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 国产盗摄XXXX视频XXXX| 亚洲欧美综合区自拍另类| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合| 视频一区二区在线观看| 最近中文字幕免费mv视频| 国产精品视频公开费视频| 亚洲网站在线免费观看| 一个人看的视频在线| 美女露胸视频网站| 日本wwwxxxxx| 国产午夜电影在线观看不卡| 亚洲AV无码专区国产乱码DVD | 国产99视频精品免视看7| 久久香蕉国产线看观看99 | 老师我好爽再深一点视频| 日韩精品一区二区三区中文3d | 吃奶呻吟打开双腿做受视频| 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码二区| 舌头伸进去里面吃小豆豆| 日本三人交xxx69| 国产人澡人澡澡澡人碰视频| 久久精品国产欧美日韩亚洲| 日本在线视频网址| 欧洲成人在线视频| 国产精品久久国产精品99盘| 亚洲国产精品xo在线观看| 8天堂资源在线| 欧美日韩在大午夜爽爽影院| 国产精欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩久久精品第一区| 97在线观看视频|