• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Who Is The Big Stick Of Adidas?

    2008/4/16 0:00:00 10474

    Three Bars

    The design of the two, three and four stripes is a violation of the "three bars" trademark. Adidas uses this sword to the global competitor, the International Herald reporter, the male Adidas from Berlin, Germany. Adidas's three white stripes are trademarks of its sporting goods and sportswear. However, many fashion designers also like to use stripes, so over the years, transnational legal disputes continue. In April 10th, the European Court of justice made a ruling in favor of Adidas, which marked the global dominance of Adidas's "three bars", extending to the "two bars", "four bars" and even all stripes. In a ten year case, the European Court ruled that although Adidas trademark is three stripes, it can legally eliminate any competitor's use of two stripes. The court explained that the number of stripes is not important, but it is important whether buyers will link it to Adidas trademark. In the wake of the ruling, Adidas overcame C&A, H&M, Marca Mode and Vendex's four major international apparel brands. For this paper ruling, Adidas has been fighting for ten years. At the end of the 90s of the last century, Adidas sued the local court in Holland, saying that the two stripes used by the four big brands infringed their trademark rights. The Holland court held a long pending decision on the "difficult case" until it was submitted to the European Court of justice last year. Now, after the ruling of the European Court of justice, the case will return to the Holland court again, and ultimately the latter will determine the amount of compensation and so on. In fact, this is not the most brilliant battle of Adidas's "three bars". In the past 60 years since the establishment of Adidas in 1949, this kind of legal battle has never stopped. As early as 1970s, the German court had decided that any two, three or four stripes were designed to infringe Adidas's "three bars" trademark, which has become a permanent decision in Germany. With this case, Adidas defeated its old rival, Nike. In 2005, a pair of parallel stripes was stitched on the shorts of Nike's listed shorts. In January of next year, the local court of Cologne, Germany, supported Adidas's complaint and ordered Nike to stop selling such infringing garments and fined 1 million euros. In the same period, Tom Tailor, a German garment manufacturer, was fined 500 thousand euros for the design of the "two bars" of a jacket cuff. Outside Germany, Adidas's "striped escort war" is constantly on the way. In 2003, Adidas filed a lawsuit against Fitness Universal Trading Corporation in Luxemburg. In 2005, Adidas continued to accuse designer Ralph Lauren and Abercrombie and Fitch company to the US court. He thought that two striped patterns of clothing and sneakers were also infringing on their "three bars" trademarks. In 2006, Adidas filed a lawsuit against the Fujian Philharmonic clothing and footwear company in China. But the design of the "five bars" is an exception now. Since 1966, the Swiss K-SWISS footwear company has been using this uncontroversial five stripes. The "tigers" dominate the world after the ruling of the EU court this month, which means that if the two or three or four stripes are designed for clothing and sports shoes within the EU, it is likely to infringe Adidas's trademark rights. Some independent designers have begun to express their dissatisfaction. Ursula Hudson, a famous designer in London, believes that the design elements of the stripes should not be the private property of a company. "The most dangerous result of this decision is that it will limit the designer's creative inspiration and attack the whole design industry." In Europe, the media dissatisfied more than Hudson alone. Adidas's "three bars" logo enjoys a worldwide brand reputation of at least 90%. With this brand, its annual sales volume has exceeded 10 billion US dollars, and its annual net profit has reached hundreds of millions of dollars. Adidas magazine commented that Adidas, like a tiger protecting its cubs, fiercely protects its classical stripes, which will expand to the European Union, the United States and the whole world.
    • Related reading

    The Torch Was Disrupting In Paris. Chinese Netizens Called For The Boycott Of French Goods.

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10450

    Gucci Suffered "Li Gui" Compensation

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10463

    LV Was Boycotted By Chinese Consumers To Protect The Olympic Flame.

    Global Perspective
    LV
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10428

    Adidas'S "Olympic Experience"

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/14 0:00:00
    10443

    Adidas'S "Three Bars" Hegemony

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/14 0:00:00
    10532
    Read the next article

    "GUCCI" Sued "San Da" To Win A Lawsuit

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 91精品免费高清在线| 国产精品男男视频一区二区三区| 国产精品二区三区免费播放心| 午夜精品久久久久蜜桃| 久久99久久99精品免观看不卡 | 免费看又爽又黄禁片视频1000| 中文字幕影片免费在线观看| 亚洲激情综合网| 欧美一区二区影院| 国产精品lululu在线观看| 亚洲一区爱区精品无码| 99热这里只有精品国产动漫| 激情网站免费看| 国内外一级毛片| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合AV| 中文字幕一区二区精品区| 经典国产一级毛片| 小箩莉奶水四溅小说| 伊人五月天综合| 91免费播放人人爽人人快乐| 欧美换爱交换乱理伦片老| 在线看片无码永久免费aⅴ| 亚洲色大成网站www永久| 91亚洲精品自在在线观看| 欧美一级夜夜爽视频| 国产成人18黄网站麻豆| 中文无码日韩欧免费视频| 精品国产一区二区三区不卡在线| 女人隐私秘视频黄www免费| 亚洲第一极品精品无码久久| 99精品国产99久久久久久97| 欧美特黄一免在线观看| 在线电影中文字幕| 亚洲影视自拍揄拍愉拍| 99精品视频在线观看免费播放| 欧美综合自拍亚洲综合图片区| 国产精品一区二区四区| 久久久久亚洲AV无码专区网站| 美女图片在线视频精品播放| 成人免费在线视频| 亚洲精品视频观看|