• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Who Is The Big Stick Of Adidas?

    2008/4/16 0:00:00 10474

    Three Bars

    The design of the two, three and four stripes is a violation of the "three bars" trademark. Adidas uses this sword to the global competitor, the International Herald reporter, the male Adidas from Berlin, Germany. Adidas's three white stripes are trademarks of its sporting goods and sportswear. However, many fashion designers also like to use stripes, so over the years, transnational legal disputes continue. In April 10th, the European Court of justice made a ruling in favor of Adidas, which marked the global dominance of Adidas's "three bars", extending to the "two bars", "four bars" and even all stripes. In a ten year case, the European Court ruled that although Adidas trademark is three stripes, it can legally eliminate any competitor's use of two stripes. The court explained that the number of stripes is not important, but it is important whether buyers will link it to Adidas trademark. In the wake of the ruling, Adidas overcame C&A, H&M, Marca Mode and Vendex's four major international apparel brands. For this paper ruling, Adidas has been fighting for ten years. At the end of the 90s of the last century, Adidas sued the local court in Holland, saying that the two stripes used by the four big brands infringed their trademark rights. The Holland court held a long pending decision on the "difficult case" until it was submitted to the European Court of justice last year. Now, after the ruling of the European Court of justice, the case will return to the Holland court again, and ultimately the latter will determine the amount of compensation and so on. In fact, this is not the most brilliant battle of Adidas's "three bars". In the past 60 years since the establishment of Adidas in 1949, this kind of legal battle has never stopped. As early as 1970s, the German court had decided that any two, three or four stripes were designed to infringe Adidas's "three bars" trademark, which has become a permanent decision in Germany. With this case, Adidas defeated its old rival, Nike. In 2005, a pair of parallel stripes was stitched on the shorts of Nike's listed shorts. In January of next year, the local court of Cologne, Germany, supported Adidas's complaint and ordered Nike to stop selling such infringing garments and fined 1 million euros. In the same period, Tom Tailor, a German garment manufacturer, was fined 500 thousand euros for the design of the "two bars" of a jacket cuff. Outside Germany, Adidas's "striped escort war" is constantly on the way. In 2003, Adidas filed a lawsuit against Fitness Universal Trading Corporation in Luxemburg. In 2005, Adidas continued to accuse designer Ralph Lauren and Abercrombie and Fitch company to the US court. He thought that two striped patterns of clothing and sneakers were also infringing on their "three bars" trademarks. In 2006, Adidas filed a lawsuit against the Fujian Philharmonic clothing and footwear company in China. But the design of the "five bars" is an exception now. Since 1966, the Swiss K-SWISS footwear company has been using this uncontroversial five stripes. The "tigers" dominate the world after the ruling of the EU court this month, which means that if the two or three or four stripes are designed for clothing and sports shoes within the EU, it is likely to infringe Adidas's trademark rights. Some independent designers have begun to express their dissatisfaction. Ursula Hudson, a famous designer in London, believes that the design elements of the stripes should not be the private property of a company. "The most dangerous result of this decision is that it will limit the designer's creative inspiration and attack the whole design industry." In Europe, the media dissatisfied more than Hudson alone. Adidas's "three bars" logo enjoys a worldwide brand reputation of at least 90%. With this brand, its annual sales volume has exceeded 10 billion US dollars, and its annual net profit has reached hundreds of millions of dollars. Adidas magazine commented that Adidas, like a tiger protecting its cubs, fiercely protects its classical stripes, which will expand to the European Union, the United States and the whole world.
    • Related reading

    The Torch Was Disrupting In Paris. Chinese Netizens Called For The Boycott Of French Goods.

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10450

    Gucci Suffered "Li Gui" Compensation

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10463

    LV Was Boycotted By Chinese Consumers To Protect The Olympic Flame.

    Global Perspective
    LV
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10428

    Adidas'S "Olympic Experience"

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/14 0:00:00
    10443

    Adidas'S "Three Bars" Hegemony

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/14 0:00:00
    10532
    Read the next article

    "GUCCI" Sued "San Da" To Win A Lawsuit

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产zzjjzzjj视频全免费| 久久久久久久99精品免费观看| 亚洲免费综合色在线视频| 久久夜色精品国产欧美乱| ririai66在线观看视频| 欧美日韩另类综合| 精品一区二区三区免费视频| 欧美性受xxxx狂喷水| 无码中文字幕日韩专区| 国产色爽女小说免费看| 国产一区二区三区日韩欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩在线综合福利| 久久久久久九九99精品| 69精品久久久久| 国产精品一区二区久久不卡| 国产真实伦视频在线视频| 午夜免费理论片a级| 亚洲av第一网站久章草| juy639黑人教练君岛美绪| 香港全黄一级毛片在线播放| 污污网站在线免费观看| 撞击着云韵的肉臀| 国产白嫩美女在线观看| 人人澡人人爽人人| 中文字幕不卡一区| 成人精品一区二区户外勾搭野战| 浮力影院欧美三级日本三级| 手机在线观看视频你懂的| 国产激情久久久久影| 亚洲精品国产首次亮相| 丫头稚嫩紧窄小缝| 青青青国产在线观看| 欧美帅老头oldmangay| 天天射天天操天天色| 国产a级黄色片| 久久精品视频6| 5060在线观看| 狠狠做深爱婷婷综合一区| 成人字幕网视频在线观看| 国产女人18毛片水真多1| 亚洲国产精品成人久久|