• <abbr id="ck0wi"><source id="ck0wi"></source></abbr>
    <li id="ck0wi"></li>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li><button id="ck0wi"><input id="ck0wi"></input></button>
  • <abbr id="ck0wi"></abbr>
  • <li id="ck0wi"><dl id="ck0wi"></dl></li>
  • Home >

    Who Is The Big Stick Of Adidas?

    2008/4/16 0:00:00 10474

    Three Bars

    The design of the two, three and four stripes is a violation of the "three bars" trademark. Adidas uses this sword to the global competitor, the International Herald reporter, the male Adidas from Berlin, Germany. Adidas's three white stripes are trademarks of its sporting goods and sportswear. However, many fashion designers also like to use stripes, so over the years, transnational legal disputes continue. In April 10th, the European Court of justice made a ruling in favor of Adidas, which marked the global dominance of Adidas's "three bars", extending to the "two bars", "four bars" and even all stripes. In a ten year case, the European Court ruled that although Adidas trademark is three stripes, it can legally eliminate any competitor's use of two stripes. The court explained that the number of stripes is not important, but it is important whether buyers will link it to Adidas trademark. In the wake of the ruling, Adidas overcame C&A, H&M, Marca Mode and Vendex's four major international apparel brands. For this paper ruling, Adidas has been fighting for ten years. At the end of the 90s of the last century, Adidas sued the local court in Holland, saying that the two stripes used by the four big brands infringed their trademark rights. The Holland court held a long pending decision on the "difficult case" until it was submitted to the European Court of justice last year. Now, after the ruling of the European Court of justice, the case will return to the Holland court again, and ultimately the latter will determine the amount of compensation and so on. In fact, this is not the most brilliant battle of Adidas's "three bars". In the past 60 years since the establishment of Adidas in 1949, this kind of legal battle has never stopped. As early as 1970s, the German court had decided that any two, three or four stripes were designed to infringe Adidas's "three bars" trademark, which has become a permanent decision in Germany. With this case, Adidas defeated its old rival, Nike. In 2005, a pair of parallel stripes was stitched on the shorts of Nike's listed shorts. In January of next year, the local court of Cologne, Germany, supported Adidas's complaint and ordered Nike to stop selling such infringing garments and fined 1 million euros. In the same period, Tom Tailor, a German garment manufacturer, was fined 500 thousand euros for the design of the "two bars" of a jacket cuff. Outside Germany, Adidas's "striped escort war" is constantly on the way. In 2003, Adidas filed a lawsuit against Fitness Universal Trading Corporation in Luxemburg. In 2005, Adidas continued to accuse designer Ralph Lauren and Abercrombie and Fitch company to the US court. He thought that two striped patterns of clothing and sneakers were also infringing on their "three bars" trademarks. In 2006, Adidas filed a lawsuit against the Fujian Philharmonic clothing and footwear company in China. But the design of the "five bars" is an exception now. Since 1966, the Swiss K-SWISS footwear company has been using this uncontroversial five stripes. The "tigers" dominate the world after the ruling of the EU court this month, which means that if the two or three or four stripes are designed for clothing and sports shoes within the EU, it is likely to infringe Adidas's trademark rights. Some independent designers have begun to express their dissatisfaction. Ursula Hudson, a famous designer in London, believes that the design elements of the stripes should not be the private property of a company. "The most dangerous result of this decision is that it will limit the designer's creative inspiration and attack the whole design industry." In Europe, the media dissatisfied more than Hudson alone. Adidas's "three bars" logo enjoys a worldwide brand reputation of at least 90%. With this brand, its annual sales volume has exceeded 10 billion US dollars, and its annual net profit has reached hundreds of millions of dollars. Adidas magazine commented that Adidas, like a tiger protecting its cubs, fiercely protects its classical stripes, which will expand to the European Union, the United States and the whole world.
    • Related reading

    The Torch Was Disrupting In Paris. Chinese Netizens Called For The Boycott Of French Goods.

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10450

    Gucci Suffered "Li Gui" Compensation

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10463

    LV Was Boycotted By Chinese Consumers To Protect The Olympic Flame.

    Global Perspective
    LV
    |
    2008/4/16 0:00:00
    10428

    Adidas'S "Olympic Experience"

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/14 0:00:00
    10443

    Adidas'S "Three Bars" Hegemony

    Global Perspective
    |
    2008/4/14 0:00:00
    10532
    Read the next article

    "GUCCI" Sued "San Da" To Win A Lawsuit

    主站蜘蛛池模板: 最近中文字幕免费4| 国产精品视频久久久久| 成年人在线免费观看视频网站| 天天做天天爱天天综合网| 国产亚洲精品bt天堂精选 | 抬头见喜全集免费版| 国产精品成人网| 免费女人18毛片a级毛片视频 | asspics美女裸体chinese| h电车侵犯动漫在线播放| 蜜臀av性久久久久蜜臀aⅴ| 欧美大片一区二区| 天天做天天爱夜夜想毛片| 人人妻人人狠人人爽| 久久99精品久久久久久噜噜| 青青草原视频在线观看| 男男动漫全程肉无删减有什么 | 天堂а√在线中文在线新版| 国产99在线a视频| 五十路在线播放| 91免费国产在线观看| 禁忌2电影在线观看完整版免费观看| 日本三级片网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区加勒比| 亚洲精品456| yw在线观看成人免费| 老师的兔子好多软水在线看| 日韩精品免费在线视频| 国产真实乱子伦精品| 亚洲婷婷在线视频| av天堂午夜精品一区| 欧美激情一区二区三区在线| 夫妇交换性3中文字幕| 午夜福利一区二区三区在线观看| 久久久综合久久| 骚虎影院在线观看| 晚上睡不着来b站一次看过瘾 | 免费高清电影在线观看| 中文在线视频观看| 色一乱一伦一图一区二区精品| 日韩av片无码一区二区不卡电影|