Sports Shoes Event PK "Fan Pao Run"

In June 13th, ICBC posted a description of the Mianyang branch of ICBC regarding the purchase of sports shoes by the Fucheng branch for earthquake relief expenses.

According to the statement, the purchase of sports shoes by the Fucheng branch is due to the needs of earthquake relief, but there is a mistake of high price and false invoices.

The special expenses for earthquake relief work is the internal cost of ICBC, which is absolutely not related to the donation of earthquake relief funds.

ICBC's explanation is undoubtedly disappointing.

If the problem of "buy shoes" exposed in previous audit is a public injury, then this irresponsible explanation can be described as "the two injury".

Because this explanation is full of loopholes, which can not convince the public at all.

The relevant person in charge repeatedly stressed that "the special expenses for earthquake relief work" is the internal cost of ICBC, which is absolutely not related to the donations for earthquake relief. However, since it is a special fee for earthquake relief, it can only be used for earthquake relief work. This is actually not different from the donations donated by people for earthquake disaster relief.

And if it's simply for earthquake relief, do you need to buy 500 yuan a pair of shoes?

Since it is the need for earthquake relief, it is clear that the purchase of shoes can be clearly stated on the invoice. Why should it be bought as an umbrella or a raincoat?

Therefore, this is not a "high price, too much waste". Instead, it is seeking the benefits from the name of earthquake relief. It is not a wrong way to fill in the false name invoice, but rather a violation of discipline.

In the past, Fan Meizhong, a middle school teacher, abandoned students when he was at the time of the earthquake and ran away alone. He then published an article on the Internet to justify himself. He was called "fan Pao run" by people.

In the event of "sports shoes", the words and deeds of banks are much less reflective than "fan run".

Fan Meizhong is not virtuous, but ultimately it is individual behavior. As a public service institution, the private bank misappropriated the special fee for earthquake relief, then it can not talk freely and try to quibble, but must give the public a satisfactory explanation.

The "fan Pao" incident is only a matter of moral controversy, while the "sports shoes" incident must be interpreted in a legal way.

It is hoped that the relevant departments will, in accordance with the requirements of the central leading group for earthquake relief, identify the matter in accordance with the law, so as to safeguard the rights and interests of the public, especially the compatriots in the disaster areas.