How To Break The Stalemate Of Eliminating Backward Production Capacity In Textile Industry

　　 spandex As a policy support for heavy industrialization of special fiber materials, Xinxiang chemical fiber 12 thousand tons spandex project launched to enhance its profitability and risk resistance ability is self-evident. However, judging from the price of the four major domestic spandex listed companies, Taihe new material, Huafeng spandex, and Yu Li holdings are proud and powerful. Only Xinxiang chemical fiber is slightly inferior. The reason why spandex business share is limited. The company's annual output of 20 thousand tons of viscose filament production line in July 26th, the Ministry of industry and Commerce in 2013 to eliminate backward production capacity list is even worse.

Although the first time announcement of Xinxiang chemical fiber was clarified, the elimination accounted for only 10% of the total annual production capacity of the company, accounting for 15% of the annual production capacity of the viscose filament and 7% of the annual sales of the company. According to the current market situation of viscose staple, the performance of the company had little impact on the company's performance. However, because of the elimination of backward production capacity in 2012, the Xinxiang egret Chemical Fiber Group Co., Ltd., the same group holding the group's two list of bad luck, could not escape.

The Ministry of industry eliminated backward production capacity list involving 19 listed companies in 19 industries. Textile industry In addition to the Xinxiang chemical fiber list, there is also known as "lying in the gun" of the shares of the Sha Sha. The company said that the list of Zhejiang lat Sha Knitting Co., Ltd. as the controlling shareholder of the group of lssha group, mainly engaged in the manufacture and sale of socks, wrapped yarn and other products, and the listed company lssha shares is only the same substantive control enterprise related party, the elimination of printing and dyeing capacity of 17 million 500 thousand meters has no impact on the company.

However, the pleas of listed companies can not stop investors' doubts. The conflict of negative information can not be written off by listed companies which are related to the interests of investors. They claim that they are not affected but they are secretly hurt. For those entities that can't afford to get rid of it, they still do not know how many unseen places may breed "tricky". At the beginning, many enterprises across the country heard that closing or eliminating part of the backward production lines would receive a lot of subsidies, but finally they learned that due to the Limited financial resources, the rumored subsidies amounted to only one million yuan, with a minimum of only tens of thousands of yuan, and the cost of replacing equipment was much more than that. All of this, when we saw the Ministry of industry's elimination of backward production capacity list in fourth years, we could not help asking questions:

Where does the time lag come from? On the other hand, the Ministry of industry and information technology requires the relevant companies to strive to complete the task before the end of September. On the other hand, nearly 8 of the listed companies have indicated that the task has been completed several months ago or even last year. The earliest record of Xinxiang chemical fiber certification is the seventh seventh session of the board of directors to consider the motion held in April 16th. The existence of time difference either reflects the lag of environmental monitoring, or suspects that the local government is acting on behalf of others, and finally becomes a digital game.

Who will complete the investment guidelines? A post that involves a company's stock coming out of capacity will trigger a high reprint. It means: "if someone says that your home TV is a high-energy product that consumed 8 years ago, it should be eliminated and buy a new one. If it's a publicity campaign, you can laugh it off, but if it's a serious request from the Department concerned that you must buy a new one, how do you feel?" most of the commentary said that if we need to eliminate something, we must finally have the market has the final say, such as taking out an environmental indicator, the same standard for small and medium-sized enterprises. In order to get across the harsh threshold, we may have to invest heavily in the investment. After estimating the enterprises, they think that the business will not be cost-effective.

{page_break}

　　 Control capacity What is the reason for failure? The so-called "excess capacity" is a relative concept. Its liquidity is closely related to the industry. From the typical type, it is obvious that the "dumping flow" to the central and western part of the industry is obviously the most unreasonable. The disadvantages of the "shared flow" formed by the merger and reorganization of enterprises instead of shutting down and exiting are also very obvious. At present, the elimination of backward production capacity in China is mainly the service of the concentration of industries, and there is no provision for the digestion of the supporting industries of the discharged products, resulting in the more vicious circle of excess elimination.

At present, the most popular way of thinking is "blocking the side and scattering the side". Experts believe that it is necessary for China to change the traditional thinking of eliminating backward production capacity and only grasping the output of production terminals. Instead, we should consider recycling a supporting industry from the downstream of the production end, guiding the high efficiency growth with zero emission thinking, instead of driving out the matter rudely like now.