LV Company V. Trademark Infringement Case Series Settlement

< p style= "text-align: center" > < img border= "0" align= "center" width= "476" height= "561" alt= "" height= "/" > "
< p > the fifth intermediate people's Court of Chongqing recently opened a series of cases involving French company Louis Weedon Marley Siti (< a href= "http://sjfzxm.com//business/" > LV company < /a >), and complained about a series of cases of infringement of trademark rights in a star hotel in Chongqing, and contributed to the agreement between the two sides. < /p >
< p > the commodities purchased by notarization, such as suitcases, wallets, satchel and girdle are all counterfeited. < /p >
< p > plaintiffs believe that the defendant's normal Hotel selling behavior is serious and sustained for a long time, causing serious losses to the plaintiff. Because the defendant hotel is a branch of a state-owned enterprise in Chongqing, it is requested to decide that the defendant's hotel and its superior company stop the infringement, apologize for the loss, and compensate for the total economic losses amounting to 2 million 200 thousand yuan. The defendant Hotel and its superior company argued that in 2010, they had already rented the lobby of the hotel to the outsiders to run boutiques, and knew nothing about the sale of goods in the boutique. The defendant had just made an invoice. < /p >
< p > at present, the high-end star rated hotels have opened up shopping malls in the lobby to conduct retail sales, which have become one of the places where consumers buy high-end brand-name goods, but the phenomenon of selling fake goods is also common. In recent years, LV has launched anti counterfeiting activities in many cities across the country for the purpose of selling fake hotels. Only in 2012, Chongqing five middle court accepted nine such cases. < /p >
< p > < < a href= > http://sjfzxm.com//business/ > > case > /a > has a certain representativeness. The fifth middle court of Chongqing has constituted a collegial panel of five people, and has conducted a public hearing on this series of cases on the National Legal Publicity Day. < /p >
< p > > a href= "http://sjfzxm.com//business/" > court trial < /a >, both sides of the prosecution and defense presented evidence and made full comments on the debate. After finding out the facts and obtaining the consent of the parties, the collegiate bench did a patient explanation, which facilitated the two parties to reach a mediation agreement. < /p >