Interview With Ma Qingbin, Expert Of China International Economic Exchange Center

< p > Lou Jiwei, Minister of finance, said recently that China should promote the policy of minimum purchase price and temporary purchase and storage policy to the separation of price and premium, and organize the pilot of soybean and cotton target price subsidies. Then, what are the drawbacks of the current policy of "storage and support"? How to promote the separation of prices and subsidies? For this reason, Ma Qingbin, an expert in China International Economic Exchange Center, interviewed finance. < /p >
< p > > a href= "http://www.91se91.com/pioneer/" > Ma Qingbin < /a >, Ph. D., National Center for national studies of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, associate professor of China International Economic Exchange Center. He has worked in the town development research institute affiliated to the national development and Reform Commission. He has presided over and participated in the major research projects of the national planning for the early 12th Five-Year. Currently, he is mainly engaged in the research of urbanization and industrial development. < /p >
< p > < strong > reporter: the state will adopt the policy of < /strong > a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > strong > difference subsidy < /strong > /a > strong > to obtain the current policy of temporary storage and towing market. What is the reason? < / strong > < > >
< p > Ma Qingbin: I think there are two reasons for the specific reasons. One is that under such a big background, the Third Plenary Session of the third plenary session also put forward a policy to reform the subsidy agriculture. How to reform? The purpose of the reform is to let the limited financial subsidy fund be used on the knife edge. Where can it be? Is it really possible to protect the enthusiasm of these growers of cotton, grain, cotton and soybeans? Later, its negative impact on the market has also come into being. The typical performance is that when the storage price of soybeans is higher than the market price, a large quantity of soybeans will flow into the warehouse and be stored without getting into the production and processing links, not to mention the sales link. On the contrary, a large number of international soybeans will take advantage of the deficiency. In this case, the farmers who grow soybeans, including farmers who grow cotton, do not make money, and the processing plants at the other end can not even get the soybeans and stop production. At that time, the policy that once applied to the closed market in the international trade of agricultural products is becoming more and more globalized. Under the open market environment, the policy has not only played an ideal role, but on the contrary, it has played a counterproductive role. The second reason I think is in the past many years, in the actual operation process, for cotton and soybean special period put forward a rational policy, once normalization. < /p >
< p > < strong > reporter: some analysts also mentioned that the current < /strong > a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > strong > storage and purchase policy < /strong > /a > strong > will not be terminated immediately, and there is no specific timetable and details for the new mode of collection. Is there any technical obstacle if we want to implement the new difference subsidy? Are there any difficulties?
< p > Ma Qingbin: from the current discussion, the obstacles to technology are basically around the way of replenish, according to the area, how to subsidize and subsidize the production. I think the question still needs to be adjusted: why should we not reform? The issue of agricultural subsidies, in general, is to protect farmers' interests around the premise of increasing the output of agricultural products, and who can produce more food. So, I will subsidize them. Of course, there is a problem of market fluctuation. In this case, I think we should be more inclined to subsidize farmers while increasing the amount of capital to support large agricultural households, cooperatives and so on. < /p >