The US Falsely Accusing China Of "Counterfeit Goods First" Is Intended To Protect Trade.

< p > < strong > China's fake punishment is obvious to all. < /strong > /p >

< p > recently, the US trade representative office issued a report that Beijing's "a" href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > silk market < /a > and Guangzhou's textile wholesale center and other Chinese entity markets have become the largest source of global counterfeit goods, while more than 20 stores in China have been accused of selling pirated movies, games and software.

< /p >

< p > however, the so-called "fake first" statement in China is simply untenable. The strength and achievements of China's anti-counterfeiting and punishment in recent years are obvious to all.

Bai Ming, deputy director of the international market research department of the Ministry of Commerce, pointed out in an interview with reporters that China has always maintained that competitiveness is based on quality rather than on competitive bidding at low prices. China has not indulge in the subjective intent of counterfeit goods, which is not in line with the direction of foreign trade pformation and upgrading.

Since China's accession to the WTO, China has been stepping up its efforts to crack down on counterfeiting and counterfeiting, especially in China's "3. 15" international consumer rights day.

< /p >

< p > 2013, the Ministry of public security cracked 55180 cases of damage to people's livelihood, namely, "a href=" http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp "false selling, selling less than /a", and arrested 59222 suspects, involving a total value of 172 billion 900 million yuan, destroying 1260 sources of regional and territorial crime and supply and marketing network.

Chai Haitao, deputy director of the National Leading Group on the fight against infringement and counterfeiting, said that apart from the judiciary, there are 9 administrative law enforcement departments involved in the fight against infringement and counterfeiting.

< /p >

< p > < strong > < /strong > < a > href= > http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp > strong > American manufacturing trade < /strong > /a > strong > friction increase > /strong > < > > > > > > > > > > strong >

< p > "it is doubtful whether the US report has been investigated by authoritative bodies."

Bai Ming pointed out that the United States turned a blind eye to these efforts made by China, but only found individual cases to generalize.

America's excuse for counterfeiting does not exclude trade protectionism.

< /p >

Since the beginning of this year, the United States has launched a "double anti" investigation or ruling on 11 commodities in China, P.

In January 6th, the US International Trade Commission continued to impose a "double reverse" tariff on imports of non Road tire products from China. On the same day, it decided to maintain a "double reverse" tax order for Chinese rubber magnets. In January 8th, the US Department of Commerce launched a "double reverse" investigation on China's calcium hypochlorite. In January 17th, the United States International Trade Commission announced the launch of "a href=" http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp "337 survey" for ZTE and other Chinese mobile phones and tablet computers sold in the US. January 23rd, the United States decided to launch a "double reverse" investigation on China's photovoltaic products again.

< /p >

< p > "the United States has launched such a" a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" trade dispute > /a "in such a short time. It is relatively rare in international bilateral trade.

Wang Jian, director of the center for international business studies, School of international economics and trade, University of foreign trade and economics, believes that there are two reasons for this phenomenon: from the big background, after a financial crisis, the United States is in the critical period of recovery of manufacturing industry, and its domestic trade protectionism is gradually rising. China's manufacturing industry also has a "job hopping" with the related industries of the United States, so the US has more and more trade protection measures against China. From the direct cause, the strategic economic dialogue between China and the United States is expected to be held in the first half of this year.

< /p >

< p > < strong > splash water is to implement trade protection < /strong > /p >

< p > in fact, the United States, which has always held high the banner of free trade, has repeatedly applied double standards to China.

Starting from the first round of Sino US strategic and economic dialogue in 2009, and the end of the end of 2013, the twenty-fourth China US Joint Commission on commerce and trade, the United States made a promise to give fair treatment to China in the reform of export control system in many talks, but this is not the case.

< /p >

< p > the US Congress passed the < a href= "http://sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > fiscal year 2014 comprehensive Appropriation Bill < /a >. However, it continues to hold high trade protection sticks to China, including restricting the US government agencies to purchase Chinese information technology products, restricting the US China export commercial satellites and zero parts and other discriminatory content in China.

In this regard, the director of the Oceania division of the Ministry of Commerce believes that there are discriminatory treatment of Chinese enterprises in the provisions of the bill, which violates the principle of fair trade and sends wrong signals to the outside world, which will also harm the interests of American enterprises.

< /p >

Shen Danyang, spokesman of the Ministry of Commerce, said that there are some differences and frictions between China and the United States in the economic field, which is inevitable. P

China maintains that both sides should take an objective view and should not politicize economic and trade issues.

Because the essence of mutual benefit and win-win nature of Sino US economic and trade relations will not change. The common interests of the two countries will not change. The willingness of the two countries to expand pragmatic cooperation will not change.

< /p >

< p > in the face of the constantly provoked trade war such as the United States, Bai Ming suggested that on the one hand, we should speed up the pformation of the mode of trade growth, enhance the non price competitiveness of products, raise the brand, service and quality of products; on the other hand, we should also actively respond to complaints and initiate counter measures to safeguard industrial safety and legitimate rights and interests of enterprises.

In addition, we should improve the mode of foreign trade and pform the simple export into a pattern of combining exports with local employment.

< /p >