Armani'S Nominal Fabric Handbag Is Actually Indicted For Artificial Leather.

< p align= "center" > IMG src=/uploadimages/201403/03/20140303090738_sj.JPG align=center border=0 > /p >

< p align= "center" > plaintiff agent shows problematic bag < /p >.

< p > < strong > fabric changing artificial leather Armani is accused of fraud < /strong > < /p >

< p > defendant: the plaintiff is a professional counterfeit buyer. There is a problem with the intention of purchasing the package < /p >

< p > plaintiff: if the mark does not conform, the defendant should be compensated for fraud (< /p >).

< p > the Armani handbag marked as fabric has been authenticated and the material is made of artificial leather. Mr. Zhang will take a shopping mall to the court for compensation.

This morning, Chaoyang Court heard the case.

< /p >

< p > < strong > case < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > buy 14 Armani bags logo problem, < /strong > /p >

In September 2012, Mr. Zhang claimed that in September 2012, he bought 14 brands of handbags marked "fabric" in a shopping mall Giorgio Armani (P JEANS) brand, and consumed a total of 27800 yuan.

< /p >

< p > after purchase, he found that the material of the handbag product is artificial leather, and the content of the Chinese certificate is seriously inconsistent with the actual situation.

< /p >

< p > after the inspection of the international a href= "http://www.91se91.com/" target= "_blank" > leather < /a > product quality supervision and inspection center and reporting to the Chaoyang District Bureau of industry and commerce, it is confirmed that the material of the handbag fabric is genuine artificial leather, and the logo does not meet the standard requirements.

< /p >

< p > Mr. Zhang thinks that the sale of handbags made of fake leather made of artificial leather is fraudulent by the shopping malls, which violates the relevant laws of China's consumer rights protection law and other related laws. It seriously infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers and causes huge economic losses to themselves. Therefore, it appeals to the court for compensation for economic losses of 83400 yuan.

< /p >

< p > < strong > < < /strong > < /p >.

< p > < strong > plaintiff: the material and the marking of the package are not the same as < /strong > /p >

At 9:30 a.m., at P a.m., Mr. Zhang, who was 47 years old, did not come today. Instead, he commissioned an agent to appear in court. A defendant's department store was represented by two agents.

< /p >

"P" plaintiff claims that in September 2012, she bought four brands of Giorgio Armani (ARMANI JEANS) brand counters in the defendant's shopping mall, and bought 14 bags of fabrics labeled as fabrics, which consumed a total of 27800 yuan in September 2012.

< /p >

After the purchase of P, Mr. Zhang accidentally discovered that the fabric of the handbag was made of synthetic leather instead of fabric, and the contents of the Chinese certificate were in serious discrepancy with the actual situation.

< /p >

After P > the inspection by the international leather quality supervision and inspection center and the report to the Chaoyang District industrial and commercial bureau confirmed that the material of the handbag is really made of artificial leather, and the logo does not meet the requirements of the QB/T1333-2010 standard.

During the period, the plaintiff negotiated compensation with the defendant several times, but all of them were refused by the defendant.

< /p >

< p > Mr. Zhang believes that the defendant sold fraudulent means to sell handbags made of fake leather fabric, which violated the relevant laws of China's consumer rights protection law, seriously violated the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, and caused huge economic losses to the plaintiff.

< /p >

< p >, so we told the court to ask for three times compensation, the amount of compensation was 83400 yuan.

< /p >

< p > < strong > defendant: artificial leather is based on fabric < /strong > < /p >.

< p > the defendant disagrees with the plaintiff's claim. The defendant said the plaintiff changed the facts of the complaint in court and changed the label "genuine leather" to "fabric".

Fabric is the base layer of artificial leather, artificial leather is made of fabric and plastic (10670, -110.00, -1.02%) and so on. Therefore, the defendant thinks that the product label can not be misleading to the plaintiff's purchase.

The defendant had no intention of cheating.

< /p >

< p > in addition, there is a water mark in the bag. The label in the water washing label is PVC, and the Chinese name of PVC is artificial leather.

Therefore, the defendant said he had reason to believe that the plaintiff should have seen the material of the package when he bought the package, and the defendant had not concealed it, for example, the label of the product was in conformity with the physical object.

< /p >

< p > < strong > argue that the intention of the plaintiff to buy the bag is questioned. < /strong > < /p >

< p > the defendant thinks that the plaintiff is a professional fake, so they do not think they are buying goods as consumers.

< /p >

< p > denying the plaintiff's agent, "the plaintiff is definitely not a professional dummy.

Even if you know how to buy a fake, this is not against the law. "

Mr. Zhang's agent said that he would like to send his friends to buy so many packages except for his own use.

< /p >

< p > plaintiff said he bought 14 bags several times, and found that the label in the bag was different from the actual material after buying it home, so he made an appraisal to the professional institution.

In March 7th last year, the plaintiff reported to the trade and Industry Bureau, and the commerce and Industry Bureau also conducted administrative penalties against the defendant.

< /p >

< p > defendant said that the plaintiff had been negotiating with the defendant unit several times, but unlike other customers, the plaintiff went to the defendant's place many times, shouting that the defendant was selling fake goods and selling fake and inferior commodities, resulting in a large number of customers watching. "We agreed to return the goods, but the plaintiff did not agree, so they have not been negotiated".

< /p >

< p > because the defendant asked the plaintiff to produce all the 14 packages he purchased, the judge announced that he would adjourn the court, and the court will be held again in March 12th.

< /p >

< p > < strong > extended interview exposure quality gate related to OEM enterprises < /strong > /p >

Prior to "P", the media reported that Armani "a href=" http://www.91se91.com/ "target=" _blank "> clothing" /a "marked the wrong problem.

According to media reports, some consumers complained that they bought a Armani fur coat marked "100% sheepskin". After testing, they found that the material of the material was rabbit skin.

< /p >

< p >, as a partner of Armani, the dealer of the leather clothing tag, Dalian Lycra Garment Co., Ltd., admitted that there was such a problem.

< /p >

< p > the head of a high-end clothing sales company told reporters that all kinds of "quality gates" that Armani exposed in the Chinese market is related to the foundry enterprises.

For this morning's case, the person analyzed that the fraud should not belong to the brand or shopping malls, because the price difference between the fabric and the two kinds of artificial leather is not large.

It is very likely that the problem occurs in the negligence of the processing enterprise.

< /p >

< p > luxury brands will focus more on brand image shaping and marketing. They usually choose the alternative processing mode, which is authorized to produce factories in China and other countries.

< /p >

< p > in the process of production, the standards of exporting different regions or domestic markets are not the same. The same package of the same brand produced by the foundries will be "different from inside and outside".

Some OEM enterprises divide production teams into mainland China, China, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, Japan, Europe and America.

< /p >

< p > this person points out that nowadays e-commerce is booming, and consumers have gone through the era of blindly entering shopping malls to buy luxury goods.

Luxury brands should not continue to take the old road. Blind expansion of stores is outdated. It is more important to catch consumers' hearts from services. Brands need to strengthen internal control and control of supply chain chains.

< /p >

< p > < strong > shopping malls visit < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > the case did not find < /strong > < /p >.

< p > < strong > shop assistants claim that they have been off the shelf < /strong > /p >

< p > reporters visited the Armani store in Jun Tai Department Store in Xidan this morning. The shop mainly deals with Armani's leisure products, but the reporters did not find the packages involved in the design.

< /p >

< p >, the clerk said, maybe the product is out of date.

Subsequently, the reporter went to Armani Seth shop, also did not find the bag of the style of the case.

< /p >