Clothing Industry Should Be Responsible For Unfair Conduct Of Foreign Brands.

< p > in the export of China's national treasure special products, adulteration and problem products in the global recall but ignore China alone, an accident will push the responsibility to "made in China"......

Recently, the unfairness of some "foreign brands" has attracted wide attention from the Chinese public.

These injustice actions bring multiple injuries to Chinese consumers and < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > "made in China", < /a >, and it is necessary to supervise and catch up with them in accordance with the law.

< /p >

< p style= "text-align: center" > < img border= "0" align= "center" width= "235" height= "334" alt= "" height= "/" > "

< p > < /p >.

< p > however, while people are blaming a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" and "foreign brands", they should not forget that these phenomena also expose many problems of China itself.

If we have made up our loopholes, we can make the "foreign brands" unsuitable to be implemented. The protection of Chinese consumers' rights and interests can really be integrated with the international market.

< /p >

"P", "foreign brands" can not be divided into several categories: first, the temptation of profiteering.

For example, the Brand New Zealand national treasure brand Manuka honey, once known as "Manuka", the price immediately soared 20 times, this brand "Li Gui" rampant.

In March, the AQSIQ released the list of the first batch of imported unqualified products.

< /p >

< p > two is a loophole in drilling China's consumer rights protection system to avoid the huge losses that should be borne by it.

In recent years, from Toshiba to SONY, from SHARP to Johnson, many multinational companies have neglected China many times during the recall of the problem products, and some even have a strong attitude and no sense of loss.

One of the root causes of this unreasonable phenomenon is that China's product quality evaluation system and related legal systems are not sound enough, and the national standards of many products lag behind international standards, which provides convenience for multinational enterprises to "exploit loopholes".

< /p >

< p > another is to use people's impression of some "made in China" "bad evaluation" to divert attention and shirk responsibility.

For example, the British luxury car manufacturer Aston Martin recalled responsibility for the counterfeiting of Chinese parts suppliers.

In fact, the relevant Chinese parts suppliers are just a small mold company. They simply don't know that they have taken orders from Aston and Martin, nor do they have the qualification to manufacture luxury car parts.

How did Aston and Martin check the supply chain and test the quality of products? Aston Martin did not talk about these responsibilities.

< /p >

< p > it is not difficult to see that the above three kinds of phenomena, except that the first category is mainly due to the lax self-discipline of the businessmen and the poor supervision of the country of origin, the other two kinds of unfairness are related to the lack of sound China's own mechanism.

If the product quality standard system and recall system are perfect, how can the discriminatory techniques of multinational enterprises succeed? If it is not the impression that "made in China" has left "bad quality" for people, how dare multinationals regard "made in China" as a "scapegoat" and "stop arrow" at random? < /p >

< p > iron must be hard itself.

In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese consumers, it is not enough to rely solely on the moral self-discipline of enterprises.

China must further improve the supervision and accountability mechanism, so that "foreign brands" and "a href=" http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp ">" soil brand "/a are no unlucky opportunities and courage. The Chinese public can truly enjoy the" consumer first "treatment.

"Made in China" is only able to speak with products and rebuild the collective image of quality at an early date, so as to effectively avoid embarrassment and injustice brought about by others.

< /p >

< p > hope that with the continuous improvement of China's consumer rights protection system, "foreign brands" and "local brands" can be "honest".

< /p >