Analysis Of Whether Network Language Can Enter Official Documents

< p > < strong > Party A < /strong > < /p >

< p > < strong > > a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > official document < /a > refusal to speak the net is beyond dispute. < /strong > /p >

< p > > a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > network language < /a > humorous and lively, some of them also lead the social trend and convey the public aspiration, which is loved by many people, especially young people.

In such a case, some people will feel uncomfortable when they see the words "refuse the Internet buzzwords".

As a matter of fact, there is no need for state organs and textbooks to reject netspeak.

< /p >

< p > under normal circumstances, Internet buzzwords are only a kind of language used by netizens in specific contexts such as BBS, chat rooms, micro-blog, WeChat and so on. It has privacy, limitations and group nature. People on the Internet can not fully understand the meaning of every network vocabulary, let alone those who do not go online.

The official documents and textbooks serve the members of the whole society. They are open, stable and popular. If they use the Internet language arbitrarily, they will bring obstacles to information acceptance to a large number of audiences, thus causing dissatisfaction or even misunderstanding.

< /p >

< p > network language can play in a small group of people. If allowed to "rampage" willfully, it will affect the students' learning and application of standard modern Chinese, and even affect the cultural heritage.

Think of it, the network language is full of abbreviations, symbols, wrongly written characters. If these "words" and "lack of arms and legs" of the so-called "words" into the textbook with a legitimate face, students will not be "polluted".

Can you still laugh when a student opens his mouth, "a pit father", and a composition is full of "god horse" and "floating clouds"? Textbooks, as a special publication, play an important role in demonstrating and standardizing the use of words and phrases. They also play the role of educating people. No impurity can be added to them. The influence of national documents on society is huge.

It seems necessary to restrict Internet buzzwords.

< /p >

< p > < strong > Wu Yinghai < /strong > < /p >.

< p > < strong > Party B < /strong > /p >

< p > < strong > to the net language "superior" can not be cut across the board < /strong > < /p >.

< p > whether the Internet words should be entered into dictionaries, into textbooks, into the classroom, into composition, into a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > government document < /a > debate.

From the point of view of the opponents, dictionaries, textbooks, and government documents are very serious. They should be standardized and rigorous, while Internet words are often irregular and not rigorous.

Proponents believe that language is constantly developing and changing, and it needs constant metabolism. This is where the vitality of language lies.

Now many of the seemingly unstandard network words, with more people, everyone has been established, and gradually become standardized.

< /p >

< p > network words can be used, but specific problems should be analyzed concretely, looking at the situation, looking at the context, and see whether the Internet word is more mature and widely recognized.

In fact, in recent years, dictionary compilation is also keeping pace with the times, bringing more mature, stable and highly acceptable network words into the dictionary.

Of course, this kind of collection is also more cautious.

< /p >

< p > to see the regulations of Henan province is too "one size fits all".

Government documents disable Internet words are understandable, but textbooks are for children. They are most interested and need to understand new things in the times. This is one of the responsibilities of school education. Proper use of Internet words in textbooks can increase students' interest in learning.

Moreover, prohibition is inevitable. There are no Internet words in the textbooks. Children will learn themselves on the Internet.

< /p >

< p > in fact, no matter what the textbooks and official documents do not use network words, the Internet words are all there. This is the fact that no one can change.

When people are using Internet buzzwords, textbooks and documents pretend to be ignorant or refuse to use.

The result may be: these internet terms are not "different" because they are all used, but they are "alternative" and stereotyped "textbooks" and "official documents" which are self complacent and no eating.

< /p >